2 pages of DeeMe μ- + N → e- + N Forbidden in the Standard Model Discovery will be a significant result: Evidence of the new physics beyond the SM Answer to the light neutrino mass Complementary to the LHC MEG Goal Current Upper Limits (SINDRUM-II@PSI) BR[μ- Ti→ e- Ti] < 4.3 × 10-12, BR[μ- Au→ e- Au] < 7 × 10-13 Little Higgs Branching ratios could be different between light/heavy nucleus. Theory Predictions: BR = 10-12~10-17 SUSY B(μ→e conv) > 10-14 photonic: ~ BR(μ→eγ) ×O(α) ~ 10-14 non-photonic: cannot study with μ→eγ MEG(PSI): BR[μ→eγ] < 2.4 × 10-12 –on going Extra Dim. COMET/Mu2E: BR[μ-e conv.] < 10-16 – planned(2019~) DeeMe(J-PARC MLF): BR[μ-e conv.] ~ 5×10-15 Aiming to start from 2015. photonic non-photonic DeeMe Search for μ-e conversion electron directly emerging out of the primary target. H-line @MLF DeeMe Nμ- stopped @ the primary target (graphite@2009): ~1010 /sec/MW Spectrometer Hodoscope Plan of the experiment Replace the existing Graphite target with SiC. Extract delayed electrons with 105 MeV/c of the beam momentum by H line Precisely measure the electron momentum with a spectrometer. g-2/EDM Tracker Sensitivity:S.E.S. = 5 × 10-15 (8×107 sec)、MLF runs 2×107 sec per year. Can run completely independent of T2K, hadron-hall experiments, neutron experiments, muon experiments with D-, U-, S-lines. surface-μ H-line with large acceptance: H-line can be used for g-2/EDM experiments. Good for the effective use of J-PARC facility: maximize the outputs from J-PARC. Focus Solenoid Prompt Kicker Focus Solenoid Bend Mag. Capture Solenoid Pulsed Proton Beam SiC Rotation Target 3 Cost and Schedule Item Cost (kJPY) sub total Note Detector 103,000 Spectrometer Magnet 30,000 Hodoscope 10,000 WC R&D (73,000) gating-grid type 3,000 WC Construction 50,000 Readout Electronics 10,000 Target 30,000 SiC Target 30,000 H-Line Construction Facility Prompt Kicker 220,000 Magnet 60,000 Power Supply 160,000 PostDoc (3) 15,000/y 75,000 Total 428,000 2011 Design Grant-in-Aid submit H-Line const. Upstream Downstream Kicker Detector Run Analysis Multi-purpose beamline: Can be used for other experiments 2012 2013 2014 2015 4 Many pages of DeeMe Experimental Search for μ-e Conversion in Nuclear Field at Sensitivity of 10-14 with Pulsed Proton Beam from RCS --- DeeMe --M. Aoki, Osaka University on behalf of DeeMe Collaboration MuSAC 2012/2/18 DeeMe Collaboration • • • • • M. Aoki(1), Y. Miyake(2), K. Shimomura(2), N. Kawamura(2), P. Strasser(2), S. Makimura(2), M. Kinsho(3), K. Yamamoto(3), P.K. Saha(3), H. Kobayashi(3), H. Matsumoto(3), C. Ohomori(3), M. Ikegami(3), M. Yoshii(3), S. Mihara(4), H. Nishiguchi(4), K. Yoshimura(4), N. Saito(4), T. Mibe(4), D. Bryman(5), T. Numao(6) • • • • • • (1) Osaka University (2) KEK MUSE (3) KEK Accelerator (4) KEK IPNS (5) UBC (6) TRIUMF 7 Muon in the Standard Model of Particle Physics • There are three generations (flavors) of Quarks and Leptons. • Muon was found at 1936. – I.I. Rabi said “Who ordered that?” • Is the muon excited state of electron? – – The world-first search for muon rare process: > e @1947 Null Result → a hint of generation • BRtheory( ->e)~10-4 @ 1958 – – But exp. already gave BRexp. < 2 x 10-5 → Two neutrinos model • e ≠ @1962 BNL – Toward the establishment of the concept of “generation/flavor”. • (g-2)μ@BNL hints physics beyond the Standard Model Muon played very important role in the development of particle physics. 8 flavor of elementally particles Leptons Quarks • Quark Mixing u c t d s b e ? ? e – Cabbibo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) Matrix – Established --- Novel Prize@2008 • Neutrino Mixing – Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) Matrix – Homestake, Kamiokande, SNO etc. – Observed and Established. • Charged Lepton Flavor Violation (CLFV) – No observation yet at all. – Implemented to the Standard Model of Particle Physics as “forbidden”. 9 -eConversioninNuclearField • Muonic Atom (1S state) Muon Capture(MC) nuclei Muon Decay in Orbit (MDO) – MC:MDO = 1:1000(H), 2:1(Si), 13:1(Cu) – τ(free μ-) = 2.2 μs – τ(μ-;Si) = 0.76 μs • charged Lepton Flavor Violation (CLFV) μ-e Conversion in Nuclear Field Clear evidence of the new physics 11 Physics of μ-e Conversion • SUSY-GUT, SUSY-seesaw (Gauge Mediated process) BR = 10-15 = BR(μ→eγ) × O(α) τ→lγ • • • • SUSY-seesaw (Higgs Mediated process) BR = 10-12~10-15 τ→lη • • Doubly Charged Higgs Boson (LRS etc.) Logarithmic enhancement in a loop diagram for μ-N → e-N, not for μ→e γ • • • • • • • M. Raidal and A. Santamaria, PLB 421 (1998) 250 Little Higgs Models Randall-Sundrum Models SUSY with R-parity Violation Leptquarks Heavy Z’ N N Relations with other observables G. Ishidori et al., PRD 75 (2007) 115019 Recent Upper Limits SINDRUM-II: BR[μ- + Au → e- + Au] < 7 × 10-13 SINDRUM-II: BR[μ- + Ti → e- + Ti] < 4.3 × 10-12 TRIUMF: BR[μ- + Ti → e- + Ti] < 4.6 × 10-12 μ→eγ vs. μ-e conversion MEG Goal Little Higgs SUSY B(μ→e conv) > 10-14 Extra Dim. photonic-like nonphotonic-like Principle of Measurement SINDRUM II • Signal : μ- +(A,Z) → e- +(A,Z) – A single mono-energetic electron • 105 MeV • Delayed:~1μS • No accidental backgrounds • Physics backgrounds – Muon Decay in Orbit (MDO) • Ee > 102.5 MeV (BR:10-14) • Ee > 103.5 MeV (BR:10-16) – Beam Pion Capture • π-+(A,Z) → (A,Z-1)* → γ+(A,Z-1) γ → e+ e• Prompt timing SINDRUM II Results BR[μ- + Au → e- + Au] < 7 × 10-13 BR[μ- + Ti → e- + Ti] < 4.3 × 10-12 20 μ-e electrons may directly coming from a production target. an electron analogue of the surface muon. Experiment could be very simple, quick and low-cost. 22 DeeMe • Process : μ- +(A,Z) → e- +(A,Z) – A single mono-energetic electron • 105 MeV • Delayed:~1μS • No accidental backgrounds • Physics backgrounds – Muon Decay in Orbit (DIO) • Ee > 102.5 MeV (BR:10-14) • Ee > 103.5 MeV (BR:10-16) •Low Energy main part: suppressed by the – Beam Pion Capture • π-+(A,Z) → (A,Z-1)* → γ+(A,Z-1) γ → e+ e• Prompt timing •Main pulse: Kicker to reduce the detector rate. •after-protons: Suppressed owing to the beamline. •High Energy tail: Magnet Spectrometer (Δp < 0.3%) extremely small after-protons from RCS -RAP<10-17. 23 After-Proton (beam related) BG mu-e conversion J-PARC MLF Muon Facility H-line •1 MW : 3 GeV, 333 μA •High statistics •Pulse Beam: 25 Hz 50 pulses •Low backgrounds Proton Beam Proton Target • the 1st concept by Jaap Doornbos (TRIUMF) – multi purpose beamline • DeeMe + g-2 + muonium-HFS – large acceptance • > 110 msr – straight section for kickers and a separator. – moderate Δp so that the BG’s can be monitored simultaneously. • DIO backgrounds (p < 102.5 MeV/c) • Prompt backgrounds (p > 105.0 MeV/c) Detailed design is ongoing by MUSE/IMSS/J-PARC. Not fully optimized yet DIO BG Signal • Beamline: H-line Prompt BG 26 Target Material • • fMC: muonic nuclear-capture rate – (1-fMC)=ffree-decay --- useless muons: large fMC is better: larger Z. On the other hand, τμ- > 300 nsec (light Z) to avoid the prompt background • fC: Fraction of the atomic capture of muon to the atom of interest – single-element material: fc = 1 – composite material: proportional to Z (FermiTeller Z law) • Silicon-Carbide --- Si:C = 7:3 • Silicon-Carbide: – good thermal shock resistance: ΔT=450°C – high melting point: >1450°C – good radiation resistance • 10 dpa @ 1000°C or more Silicon Carbide • CERASIC target material fC × fMC Graphite 0.08 Silica-carbide (SiC) 0.46 SiC Muon Target: 6 times higher physics sensitivity!!! 27 Sensitivity and Backgrounds DIO BG • Signal Sensitivity μ-e signal – S.E.S.: 2×10-14 (for 2×107sec of run) • Backgrounds Beam BG – Assuming RAP=10-19 (based on the recent R&D) – Detector live-time Duty = 1/20000 Signal Region: 102.0 -- 105.6 MeV/c or much less • If we could extend the running-time up to 8×107 sec – Standard Cut: S.E.S.= 0.5 × 10-14 (NBG=0.48) – Tighter Cut: S.E.S.= 0.6 × 10-14 (NBG<0.02) 28 In-situ Monitoring of Backgrounds Moderate Δp of H-line makes it possible to monitor backgrounds in situ. – DIO backgrounds (p < 102.0 MeV/c) – Prompt backgrounds (p > 105.6 MeV/c) Background Monitoring – DIO electrons • shape • yield – Prompt Backgrounds • p>105.0 MeV/c (direct upper limit) • Beam-loss counters in RCS – Cosmic-induced Backgrounds • Beam-on: 50μsec/sec • Beam-off: >500msec/sec DIO BG Signal Signal Sensitivity Calibration – Calibrated by using number of DIO electrons. – NDIO=300 (2e7 sec) Prompt BG (Prompt BG) Signal Cosmic BG 29 R & D Items • H-line – Large Acceptance (> 110 msr) • Kicker – Large Aperture (320-mm × 320-mm) – High Field > 385 G – Fast fall < 300 nsec • After-protons from RCS • SiC Target – Impact on the downstream of the primary. • Detector – Drift Wire Chamber: that can be operated after 33k of the prompt burst. 30 Detector • prompt burst = 33k per pulse even after suppressed by the kicker. • BH1,2: hodoscope – gating PMT – Designed by T. Taniguchi, but he passed away. – Development is suspended. • WC1-4: wire chamber – micro-cell or asymmetric-cell – Doable, but may need further R&D • Amp. and readout FADC system. • σ < 0.3 MeV/c gating PMT 36 After-Protons from RCS STR+BPM STR+BPM RCS Pulse KM 1~3 • QFL Pulse KM 4~8 QDL Excellent design of RCS transverse acceptance – RCS ring aperture = 486π mm.mrad ring collimator aperture = 350π mm.mrad – Extraction Beamline aperture = 324π mm.mrad – Total kick angle = 17 mrad --- > 2000π mm.mrad • Fast Extraction Scheme (not a slow extraction) • Preliminary measurement of a beam-loss monitor showed promising result: RAP could be < 10-19. • Improved measurement will be performed in next February, 2012. 38 Preliminary Measurement • after-protons are scattered protons. • beam-loss counters can observe it. • 258 hours of measurement. by Kazami Yamamoto • No evidence of the after-protons so far. Measurement is limited by the electrical noise from the RCS kickers. • The above snapshot gives • RAP could be ~ 10-19 • • It is required to be < 10-17 The detectors will be improved for much better measurement in future. 39 Cost and Schedule Item Cost (kJPY) Detector sub total Note 103,000 Spectrometer Magnet 30,000 Hodoscope 10,000 WC R&D (73,000) gating-grid type 3,000 WC Construction 50,000 Readout Electronics 10,000 Target 30,000 SiC Target Multi-purpose beamline: Can be used for other experiments 30,000 H-Line Construction Facility Prompt Kicker 220,000 Magnet 60,000 Power Supply 160,000 PostDoc (3) Total 15,000/y 2011 2012 2013 75,000 428,000 2014 2015 Design Grant-in-Aid submit H-Line const. Upstream Downstream Kicker Detector Run Analysis 46 Status • KEK/IMSS Muon PAC: Stage-1 approved. • J-PARC PAC: pre Stage-1, aiming to get Stage-1. • The lab already started the procurement of magnets in the tunnel of H-Line. • Kicker design: talking with Nippon-Koshuha for the detailed cost estimate. We also are communicating with BNL C-AD department. • Gas wire chamber development is on-going. • The 2nd stage of the after-proton measurement is ongoing. • KAKENHI (Kiban S) application was submitted. 50 Summary • There is a competitive merit of physics in searching for μ-e conversion at sensitivity of 10-14 in timely manner. • Needless to say that the result should be obtained before the result from COMET and/or Mu2e. • It will maximize the potential of major discovery at J-PARC. • The experimental idea with which the physics result can be obtained within 5 years was proposed. It fits the research period of Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of Japan. • It is necessary to build a large-acceptance beamline (H-line) for the best result. The H-line can be time-shared with other experiments, such as g-2. • After protons are much smaller than that required from the experiment. • The size of cost (except for the multi-purpose H-line) is within the range of the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of Japan. • R&D activities are on-going. 51 End of Slides Ring aperture ( w/ magnets only) Begin Ext. Ins 315 320 Varying x or x’ at the starting x: ±32mm (~315) ~ ±92mm(~2600) x’:±6.5mrad (~320) ~ ±16mrad(~2000) 1st Foil Secondary (~350 Collimators キッカーの役割 • RCSからの陽子パルスに同期したprompt burst – 50M particles/pulse (2009年テスト実験実測) • 検出器が飽和してしまう。 – キッカーでpromptタイミングのみ<1/1000に減らす。 • 検出器レート 33k particles/pulse 注: 遅延粒子の量は大げさに図示してある。 磁場 > 385 Gauss Gap 320 mm Width 320 mm Length 400 mm 台数 4台 Fall Time < 300 nsec 繰り返し 25Hz 54 Transmission Efficiency Internal Inductance = 100 nH Magenta: kicker current Green: mu-e signal strength @ birth Blue: mu-e signal @ detector Internal Inductance = 500 nH -10% --- acceptable 56 キッカーコンセプトUpdate Internal inductance By H. Matsumoto (KEK) Magnet Impedance matching elements INTERNAL INDUCTANCE FALL TIME @ 500 A 100 nH 307 nsec 300 nH 361 nsec 500 nH 430 nsec MAGNET COIL CURRENT [A] 10 kA 500 A FALL TIME 1) MAGNET INDUCTANCE: 600 nH 2) IMOEDABCE MATICHING ELEMENT: 8000 pH, 100 Ohm 3) MAGNET COIL CURRENT: 10 kA 4) PFL IMPEDANCE: 5 Ohm MAY. 06, 2011 [email protected] 日本高周波とコンタクト Test Measurement How many μ- are actually stopping in the production target? J-PARC MLF Muon Facility Counters at the exit of D-Line Pb (4mmt) D2 Exit μ- e- Plastic Scintillator • • • B1: gating-PMT readout B2: gating-PMT readout B3: ND filter (1/1000), normal PMT readout B1 B2 B3 •Count only after the prompt beam-burst (>104/pulse). •Can’t close a beam slit to reduce the beam rate. Otherwise, it takes forever to accumulate the enough number of events. use gating-PMTs that can be turned-off during the prompt beam-burst. •Beam μ- will produce delayed hits if they stop in the plastic scintillator. Pb plate to absorb μElectron detection efficiency ~ 50% @ 40 MeV/c Analysis • Record PMT signals by using500MHz FADC like E787/949. • Subtract a baseline template from the recorded waveform. • Maximum hight of the pulse tagged by the other counter shows clear valley between pedestal and signal. – The detection efficiency is sufficient. • Real hits by the beam particles = B1*B2 – τ = 2.10±0.02 μs B1 pulse height (B2 tagged) B2 pulse height (B1 tagged) – Combination of τμ+(2.2μs) and τμ--C(2.0μs). There is a contamination coming from e- produced by e+ scattering where the e+ is from Michel decay of μ+ in the target. The number of stopped μ+ is 450 times more than that of μ-. e- from e+ scattering e- ~ e+/450 P Spectrum • 検出器のdetection efficiencyは鉛板の影響により、低エネルギ ーで落ち込むはず。 • pe > 40 MeV/cでは μ-崩壊からのe-が支配的 • pe ~ 50 MeV/cのMichel Edgeは確かに Michel Edge • pe < 30 MeV/cではμ+崩壊からのe+の散乱e-が支配的 • この効果を補正すると → μ- stopping rate = 5 × 109 /sec/MW in the current Target. • G4では 7 × 109 /sec/MW e- from e+散乱 e- gating PMT • No. of particles in a prompt pulse ~1e4 • Standard PMT is saturated. • Used a gating PMT system – off/on gain ratio = 1e6 Designed by Taniguchi Snapshot of PMT signal •B1 •Plas. Scinti. •gating •B2 •Plas. Scinti. •gating •B3 •Plas. Scinti. •normal PMT •ND filtered Baseline distortion due to delayed fluorescence from plastic scintillator. Individual hits by real particles can be seen on the baseline. G4Beamline Estimation G4Beamline model of D2 beam line 28 MeV/c μ• Geometrical Acceptance:40 msr(point source) Yield: 4.4 counts/pulse/100-kW @ detector → 5 × 109 /sec/MW in the Muon Production Target. Geant4 MC: 7 × 109 /sec/MW for SiC Rotation target: 1010/sec/MW 66 Jaap’s H-line Design muonium branch g-2 branch 67 Some Experimental Observations delayed fluorescence from the plastic scintillator kicker extinction < 6 x 10-7 limited by BG from muon decay outside no hits / 109 total protons -> extinction < 10-9 Statistics Limited 69 DeeMe @ J-PARC MLF mu-e conversion DeeMe COMET Sensitivity Schedule ~10-14 <10-16 ~2015 2017~ DeeMe does not replace COMET. DeeMe will gain momentum of muon-CLFV research field. Sound scenario to secure the world-first discovery.
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc