1393 4 501 -510 (Betula pendula Roth) Genetic diversity in white birch (Betula pendula Roth) stands using
microsatellite markers
1
1* 1 1
-1
Esmaeilpour M1, Taheri Abkenar K1, Aalami A*1, Eslam Bonyad A1
1. PhD Student, Assistant Professors, Associate Professor, University of Guilan
[email protected] : !" #$% &'!% ()! *
(92/9/24 :04" . -92/3/1 :, .)
"#$ %& ' ( )* + ,. /,2 6 ! )&C&< D< ;&< AB< ,& .7 ! , ( 68 : ;&< 6<=>?
K 7 G H .7 6:, JD ,CG 13 : , E 62F? CG H&I 68
!"#
,! 6:C,J ,Q NOP 72< NOP 72< )JL M: , ' )J
< ! 68 ;&<
L7.3,CG ), FST (FS< L D ,<* .7 R< J JD "#$ )J,CG 6
.,K &GI E )J(2! )7&
,E 6:& T$6JEP ,CG &= P <6 K
;&< 7&JG K 7 2< 7 34 ' )J(2! 68 ;&< 6O8O V DU< H !<
L ,QY NOP 72< NOP 72< N87&X )JNOP 7 W, ,B ,G .(:J(2! N )*
H M: , &\J .7 7JG 7C&: (2! Z 6:C,J 6[ )JNOP SSR
K 7& 7 68 )&C&< X G :, )J(2! 7:6 ,Z 68 )&C&< )JP
. 6:: !< (2! ")O (]^ )J&8<" ),! 6 <
... (Betula pendula Roth) ' )J
< 68 ;&<
F( i< qV (% D )) ((" .al. 2005)
&
H <`Le D f) i< M% `Le
-
"; <
(Betula pendula Roth) 7 8
.(Freeland 2005)
B CD $E F( (2n=2x=28) (=>? ,
aH K ! C(V g % <
J8 K .(Atkinson 1992) (H% 400 Mb
)H We ()L(N X mh% DX,
(?< F( % M% N O (P) FL%
K` M 8r ()E$O f) <
>E% Q8 RST (% (Zyryanova 2010) - % F .(Omidi and Farzin 2012) ()H% WB E
UO)% H >N (H S #VS KLW
>B()] `$O g <<%X c>d% % <
% < Y7>V . X se AFLP <YXBX $! F Y< ^ >H()]
Z)[ B \] ^ 0F ((W _`% K F t K .(Zane et al. 2002) (H% ()LHF K a `$O L bST c>d%
S `$O Z)% (>)e #EEh X )V
e 8 K D 8 f) F VO >)e
c>d% UO)% ! <u" m KL< .H%
UO)% K 0!
g KL% % K (
<%X < F S >)e 8 f) B (h% i)" (V!% < \B $``[
" `Le 12 D f) X% K` :( < UN gh% 8)H C(V >V O (H
e >V Q (Fraxinus excelsior) 8 F
B c>d% < BZLe e $ 7
F< (H(<% F< K )`% #S
Z% W>)e %F )F j(< F .(H% H
`Le 13 D 8 (Morand et al. 2002) l %
#VS g)e ` 0 KW " XdB
(% UO)% (Pinus sylvestris) >)ev 8 F
)E "!< Z% gk% &LH <g)e ^
-g! K D XL (Robledo Arnuncio et al. 2005)
F , 8)H CX>!% (% F <% K)] E,%
(Salehi X8 <g)e 0 8 c>d% <
l F > O . e% Y" CD D f) 8
K D f) Shanjani and Vendramin 2007)
, ()%F (" #[ >)e < bST (%
(Sorbus ; \L 8 F `Le iH `Le
K D f) X% )%F L!% #VO
(Rasmussen and Kollmann " <g)e torminalis)
`Le K` .(Thormann et al. 1994) <`Le
w> F `Le W] D f) 2008)
F l)%) source-sink &E )V g)e ` (Zolfaghari et al. \7 <g)e (Quercus branti)
()) (< )V (H% <`Le source
(Dalbergia YH m8 _`% 8 D f) 2009)
RST <% sink m8 _`% <`Le
% (H d <g)e monticola)
F D J>8 i, F fO (H% S
F `Le 16 D 8 (Andrianoelina et al. 2009)
F FF nN ()% kkd < WB (`
$] ] <g)e (Betula maximowicziana) 7 8
(% .(H% (>)e #EEh ((e #P .(Tsuda et al. 2010) K"D Jk8 Z%e #VO KH CX>!% D Z)% M%
7 ^ 0F L< e t K ah% ,oe i)" `Le 8 F(
K K D f) F VO y< $ `Le K)pL< .(H% WB g8 K D f)
< K D 8 l UEh
D )) (%B e &LT (H (% ;] (e
( z t N !E% % F B YW%
(Lowe et L< X=T WB )H %
1393 $% /4 # /!" / 502
... (Betula pendula Roth) ' )J
< 68 ;&<
C,> TE (H f$H &), % 150 ~ <
()LHF K RST $W << (%B
^ ^ (H DS kd% F }" (H ,P
.H =
Y( # B YT Y< ; .H% gE)% ((e ~ -20 H ; d U>m% & B YT ^%
(' % .H% DS }? H4
e
46 fL% 7 >[ z)" F W g d$ F }" !H ([ 70 & (H vd DNA
(H C L <{ F \d ,k O 8
#(% <DS %L) .H% gT TE DNA &
F ( %FB ( <{ .(1&(e)
.(H% C EN 13000 V EN 15
.((H (W ;8 . PCR <i)
DNA vd 0 F)W
a (H ,`% <%X <
F7B F UEh K % ([ 70 & (H BZLe <{ ( PCR i) .(2&(e) (H S Kulju et al. (2003)
.((H 8 % Z% D }? ,
N !H
200 DNA C
100g%H % 25 W YT
% 700 L< (H " { F C
>% 100 (E%
>% F7B < F ^%% 0/4 dNTPs ^%%
0/2 EDTA ^%>% 20 } ^%>% 100) vd ,
Taq YXB (T ; ( ;) PCR , YX)% (> ^%
Y( (> ^% 1/4 &"% LT -LT ([
25 mE \B F S W YT W d < g8 PVP - 40 C
>% 10 (CTAB ([ Touchdown #[ T % .(H ( %
gE)% >% 1/5 ~ }? .H% w>d% 8 95 % EN g%H & >T% O .(H TO
N e 65 % EN 60 #(% (H
>T% DNA (H H e
) &""X :C,> &>h% % 700 }? .
%
e 94 M 30g%H C( < 8] 10g%H C
(H w>d% 8 ,P ~ < (1 : 24 $!
<
F7B &k e 65 M 30 ((e ~ (e &>h% .H% DS }?
. <
F7B a! e 72 EN ; ,P B ^% z)" NaCl &>h% YT ck .H% gE)%
% M 30 g%H C( < 8] 26 g%H C >T%
& ~ YT }? .H% w>d% 8 (2&(e) F7B < )% &k % M 30 94
%B g[T &>h% ,P (
e -20) U>m%
X W a! 4 >T% . e 72 EN ;
H4
20 S)% % EN 10 #(% H% CL F }" . e 72 % EN 5 g%H
8 B Z% (H DS <~ }? .H%
&D F, F (H  #`mN ;S We PCR i)
% ^% Y( # ([ 70 & .H%
([ F
B &D ( ([ < (%Bg>"
e 37 % EN 30 #(% ,P Proteinase K
.(H C (% C( F S FHB S
&>h% (H DS <~ .H% H4
%B X
!H ^% Y( # ([ 70 & (e (Peakall and Smouse GenAlEx 6.4 X,C L)< t &>h% j4T F }" DS <~ .(H%
(... 3 2 1) (V #[ <( <L 2006)
,) TE % 100 .(H ;8 ,
N n %
< K (=>? e
e 4 % (H ,P (EDTA -}
-€8H F S D f) B .(H C <%X
DNA F€8 We .H% (W H ; #(%
(` :,
#[ GenAlEx 6.4 X,C ;L YW% <
}? .H% ( % 300 TE &>h% YT
503
1393 $%/4 # /!" / ... (Betula pendula Roth) ' )J
< 68 ;&<
UEh K (H L <`Le #kd% C -1&(e
,oe _V
,oe &O
(%) sm F fS
(H L 8 (`
`Le C
36ԝ°38
55ԝ°1
2344
10
!>
F%
35ԝ°59
53ԝ°13
2579
16
(F%
()
36ԝ°65
51ԝ°48
2
3
(F%
WH
35ԝ°44
51ԝ°23
2404
12
F$
;WH
37ԝ°34
44ԝ°35
1741
5
( F% ) 7 rB
%%
UEh K (H S <%X < #kd% C -2 &(e
(
e) &k %
(GA)4AA(GA)10
(TC)8(TTTC)2
(TC)8(TA)8(TG)11TT(TG)3
(CT)3CC(CT)2CC(CT)13AT(CT)5
(GTAT)3(GT)5
(AG)17
(TC)26
C12CTCC(CT)7TT(CT)5
(CT)12CCTT(CT)4
(GT)18(GA)14
(GA)7
(CT)11GC(AATG)2
(CT)18
(5-3) F7B C
ACGCTTTCTTGATGTCAGCC
TCACCAAGTTCCTGGTGGAT
AGACCATGCCTGGGCCTT
CGCAACAAAACACGATGAGA
CCGCCGGTAACACTAAACC
GAGGGAAGAAAATTCAACGG
CTCCTTAGCTGGCACGGAC
CCCTTCTTCATAAAACCCTCAA
AACCCTCGTTTGGCTACTGA
GAACAGTTACTAGTCAAACTGAAAACC
TTGAGATAGACGATAGAGGTAAAGCA
AGGCATTTCTCCAATTTTCTT
AAGGGCACCTGCAGATTAGA
AAAATTGCAACAAAACGTGC
GAGGAAGTCTCAGCTGACGTG
TCCTTTTCAGTTTTCTGATTTCTG
GTTTTGGGTTTCCACTTCCA
ACTGGTAATACCTTTACCAAGCC
GGGGATCCAGTAAGCGGTAT
CACACGAGAGATAGAGTAACGGAA
TGAAACGAACGGAAGAGTTG
ATACGCCAGACTTTCATCCG
GGCCAACAGATATAAAACGACG
TTTTAAATGCCCACCTTCCC
AACGGACAAATTCACGGGTA
GGAGTTCATGGATTGGAGGA
L1.10
L2.2
L2.7
L3.1
L3.4
L4.4
L5.4
L5.5
L7.1
L7.3
L7.4
L7.8
L022
&` F jh }? .(H $h% X H €8H M%
I = - H €8H Ne = 1/(1- He) M‚% gB (` gB
F ; < c>d% < {$)-<
#F< (` / N) (H (<% F< pi ln pi
X F .(Hartl and Clark 1997) (%B ( <`Le
- l % F< HO = (`Le e% <
-)`% D 8 K, (AMOVA) % }
[(/ FST) -] / D e (Hartl and Clark 1997) He =1pi
.(Peakall et al. 1995) (H S X <`Le K = (He- X%B €8H (Frankham et al. 2002) Nm =
X FST Nei (1978) &%, t D >[, }%
FST = VAP / (VAP+VWP) $ €8H FIS Ho) / He
.(H $h% X,C KL< ;L c>d% <`Le K
.(H S <
F7B F ; < (Peakall et al. 1995)
Nei (1972) >[, t <`Le K >[, C
(
()% <`Le F ; < D <%" K)pL<
(Cornuet Bottleneck X,C ;L D )) .(H Y
gB (` < gB (` gH()] <gB ([
1393 $% /4 # /!" / 504
... (Betula pendula Roth) ' )J
< 68 ;&<
1/25 `m% K <%X <e H €8H
>B &(% <%X iWe &(% and Luikart 1996)
L2.7 1/64 L5.5 0/92 F (H $h%
C
C
iWe &(% (Infinite Allele Model: IAM) (h%
7 8 (% l UEh K z t . o
>T% &(% (Stepwise Mutation Model: SMM)
`m% < $! ^ iWe L3.4 (Piry et al. 1999) (Two-phased model of mutation: TPM)
<%X ; gB (` ] < F (H
!> ( j8 %V %B <%FB
(Bowcock (H% e B iWe ( iX,
D i -iWe &` F jh X,C K .(H $h%
8 <`Le <%X < .et al. 1991)
] <`Le (Drift-mutation equilibrium)
-% ^ l % F< gB (` ^L`%
$L F t (,% nS (H D ))
l % F< gB (` &% .()H
PCR #%FB O KLP .(%FB% F<
(Streiff et al. 1998) 0/84 17 $)" \] w> (<% C(V <ƒD   C(V g L3.1
.(Bruschi et al. 2003) (H $h% 0/73 8/2 g! w> .( S <XB (
7 8 l % F< gB (` a%
(Kulju (H $h% 0/603 6/4 (), <g)e )*+ ,
F (T PT z E% K et al. 2003)
>[ Z% F 8 F ^ S DNA vd
g$N F S>d% g%V r CF^ $ .( )<L<
(Gupta et al. (H% <
K % ;D #EEh
- `Le F( (Hamrick et al. 1992) „E Y! f
8) g 7 8 .2011)
B F .()!< g8 D f) X% (Wright 1931)
L< <
K8 <{ ;D aH ,
-% l ,
„E Y! 7 8
F F YT K V .(H% , (B
UO)% …` $ .(H ^ K D f) DNA vd 4 . F(! g),>" >), #$
D i $ <g)e `Le ;]
-€8 (`% gT% ()%F H K ^ S
(E% K D 8 . (H f) i<
d <
)V g KL< . F
P .(H $h% L7.3 % (FIS) X%B P
(Howland H% \!h% DNA vd (Recalcitrant)
L022 L7.8 L7.4 L2.2 < S)% (FIS) X%B
-)W (`% <gL` t K .et al. 1991)
< <`Le <#FL< $L F % 0 W (H S DNA vd F
K^ 7 L7.3 ) e . 4%
Porebski et al. (1997) 0 gL F UEh K S
bST e ( (FIS) X%B P
DNA &kT gL` )V (%B (
B ` ` )` H K t f)
. [ gN % <
7 8 S
F< L7.3 <ƒD F
`m% % <`Le gB 54 g g[T z t
K l F K F <`Le ^
e gB (` K% .(1gH 3 &(e) (H (<%
B F .(H RST ()!< f) % K (H $h% 4/5 `m% K <%X <
4 < $! ^ FST X% L7.3
K L3.4 L2.7 L2.2 < KL L5.4 K)pL< (< <`Le K <#S (% W
e M% gB (` a% .( gB (` X%
#`m% id<
B )V % B F
% K (H $h% 3/16 `m% K <%X <
. W)" K ()
)H
K% .( M% gB (` X% K L3.4 505
1393 $%/4 # /!" / ... (Betula pendula Roth) ' )J
< 68 ;&<
(H `m% <ƒD <%X < F S D f) YW% <%" $h% -3&(e
F<
F<
(H (<%
l %
H
(effective)
0/7
0/54
0/72
1/31
- 0/5
0/78
0/89
0/75
0/4
0/22
0/25
0/39
0/4
0/43
0/26
$ €8H
X%B P
FST
FIS
0/25
0/08
0/2
D e
€8H
M‚% gB
gB (`
C
3/5
4
L1.10
1/58
4/01
6
L2.2
0/78
1/64
4/5
6
L2.7
0/28
0/8
1/68
4/9
6
L3.4
0/2
0/9
0/96
0/07
0/68
1/37
3/1
5
L4.4
0/19
0/18
1/06
0/37
0/57
0/96
2/53
3
L5.4
0/27
0/66
0/67
0/1
0/47
0/92
1/89
4
L5.5
0/19
0/6
1/05
0/24
0/65
1/19
2/86
4
L7.1
0/4
0/95
0/35
0/02
0/6
1/13
2/72
4
L7.3
0/27
- 0/2
0/6
0/52
0/66
1/2
2/91
4
L7.4
0/07
- 0/3
2/99
0/63
0/58
0/96
2/37
4
L7.8
0/34
- 0/2
0/48
0/54
0/62
1/09
2/61
4
L022
0/28
0/23
0/85
0/39
0/66
1/25
3/16
4/5
K%
300 bp
200 bp
100 bp
-F% `Le (14 5 †() `Le 4 1 †F( (M .L5.4 <%X F7B Se F S 7 <ƒD DNA  -1gH
.WH `Le 22 20 %% `Le (19 15 †
`Le l % F< [k8 <gB
^ FST (E% KH >V K (% l <gB ([ w% E% K .(H (<% WH
>h% <0F `$O \d <, (%
K% H €8H M‚% gB (` gB (` gH()]
>h% 0F FST €8H K ) KLP (< l % F< [k8 <gB (`
.(Merila and Crokrak
`Le B F .(4&(e) (H (<% () `Le
<`Le ;D <()B, KLW% F D e 2001)
-% X 7 KZ KLP ()
UEh K D e K% . M% WB g% E% K D f) c>d% <%" (H
. S>d% g%V M h (%B ( 0/85
f) F `Le K WR % Jk8 8
,oe Z% g$N F >%V D e K gE% <M
(% `Le KW )V 8 ^ D
W)" ()B #EEh !F (H i)"
r H $ .H ,
source-sink &E 7 `$O < D e id" Z% H%
, .H \)e (Founder) 4) , M F (
.H €d%
`Le (H gE)% ((e <ƒD L< 4)
c>d% <`Le K f) <€8H !E% `Le D f) F ( id ( ()H%
M% gB (` gB (` gH()] <gB ([ KL
(H 0X
$% !$L<
1393 $% /4 # /!" / 506
... (Betula pendula Roth) ' )J
< 68 ;&<
`m% % <`Le D f) a$% <%" -4&(e
%%
;WH
WH
()
F%
D f) <%"
100
100
83
100
100
gH()] <gB ([
2/0
1/9
1/6
2/82
2/06
< M‚% gB (` K%
2/41
3/16
1/83
3/75
2/91
< gB (` K%
0/76
0/74
0/52
1/1
0/78
H €8H
0
0/08
0
0/25
0/08
[k8 <gB (` K%
0/49
0/41
0/37
0/62
0/46
l % F<
8 K)] (H (<% `m% % `Le
z < g)e ` H K ()!< >[
g Y< jh >V (% l &L`%7 !
(" , m8 !F f) i< B .(Morand et al. 2002) (H (<% F< $L
H €8H K egN . <g)e #(%()>
D #S (AMOVA) % } X t ;WH %% F% () <`Le #S ([ 34 (T `m% K 7 <`Le K
(H ;] fP% K , i< WH
^ (H (<% ([ 66 (T <`Le D
% w$ KL< . m <`Le B T!%
F S .(H% < g8 K ^ f) % <`Le [k8 <gB (` w% z
`Le K f) ? 7 <`Le RAPD (h% M h X WB (4&(e) H f) PT UEh $! (H (<% ([ 64 (T
[k8 <gB .(,
N f) i< %
.(Martin et al. 2008) ()<% ^
e [k8 O `Le ; ()!< <gB
7 c>d% <`Le D 8 #S `m% -% <gB K , .(HL , `Le (
FST $ €8H (E% % < F S
< iWe F ^ $! X% g (
<g)e (Martin et al. 2008) 0/6 ? <g)e
.(Matus and Hayes 2002)(H (%B e <%X
( 0/28 UEh K (Tsuda et al. 2004) 0/16 K"D
{$) - < &` F jh 9 UEh K
Freeland ) F XL D #S ()< (%B
&` K F jh ( L022 L2.7 L1.10 <`Le K 0/106 F (FST) $ €8H (E% .(2005
&` C(V < () `Le .(
WH <`Le K 0/307 () F%
-< &` C(V e ; W) WH `Le
Em)% F ,oe >[, e . o% ;WH
&` F jh X PT `m% .(5 &(e) {$)
`Le K F D >[, < %%
KL% (H (<% <%X <  %% `Le H% W)" (2gH) <`Le
D <CX% F H FL< iX, >V
.(H ,
l (e RST (T )V L 8 (` (h% ^LT `$O \d M
() F% `Le ) e gN K)pL<
<%X f) e ]
(H (H Xe ;WH %% &LH <g)e id WH
.(Freeland 2005) () o L F( (% `m% %
-% \!h% LH (h% F v8 < g)e id
8 F " `Le F `m% L ; iL #S K 8 (2gH) ()
z H
<%X z)" F S (Fraxinus excelsior) . F F `Le {$) -< &` F jh
507
1393 $%/4 # /!" / ... (Betula pendula Roth) ' )J
< 68 ;&<
`m% % <`Le <%X <% {$) -< &` F jh -5 &(e
%%
;WH
WH
()
F%
<
L1/10
D
D
D
L 2 /2
D
L2/7
D
D
D
D
L3/4
D
D
D
D
L4/4
D
D
D
L 5 /4
D
D
D
L 5 /5
D
D
L 7 /1
D
D
D
L 7 /3
D
D
D
L 7 /4
D
D
L 7 /8
L 022
{$) -< &` F jh (D
UPGMA 0 F (%B ( `m% % c>d% `Le z)" % D >[, C
( - 2gH
<%X <% t `m% % <`Le K (}% mN K" ) Nei D >[, (}% mN ^) (FST) $ €8H E% – 6 &(e
(H S
%%
;WH
WH
()
0/202
0/21
0/305
0/106
0/16
0/13
0/2
0/15
0/307
0/207
0/816
F%
`Le
F%
0/303
()
0/59
0/903
WH
0/81
0/305
0/496
;WH
0/205
0/608
0/57
%%
`Le .( C D )) %FB gH()] (
F% `Le D )) %FB z
-F ( j8 %V %B <%FB ;WH
F< F %B <%FB F C(y< $E
%% `Le .( )`% F< <%FB Y< () `Le .(( )`%
%B %FB ( F%) 7 rB ZN
&(%) SMM !> ( j8 %V %B
8 F )`% F< F %V
8 F )`% F< F (C
C
iWe
.(7&(e)
L (` L g WH `Le .(( 1393 $% /4 # /!" / 508
... (Betula pendula Roth) ' )J
< 68 ;&<
E (>T% &(%) TPM (C
C
iWe &(%) SMM ((h% >B &(%) IAM :<%X <% t <`Le D )) -7 &(e
.((H (<% l % F< F (` O
%%
;WH
()
F%
&(%
4/7
6/3
7/1
7/1
IAM
5/8
6/8
7/2
6/1
SMM
5/4
6/6
6/8
6/4
TPM
9
3
10
6
IAM
9
3
7
6
SMM
9
3
9
6
TPM
0/01
0/04
0/07
0/ 35
IAM
0/05
0/02
0/5
0/57
SMM
0/03
0/03
0/17
0/49
TPM
0/01
0/01
0/01
0/38
IAM
0/47
0
0/03
0/03
SMM
0/36
0/07
0/07
0/14
TPM
0/1
0/59
0/04
0/ 57
IAM
0/16
0/99
0/23
0/83
SMM
0/13
0/98
0/04
0/66
TPM
-+.
Andrianoelina O, Favreau B, Ramamonjisoa L, Bouvet
JM (2009) Small effect of fragmentation on the genetic
diversity of Dalbergia monticola, an endangered tree
species of the eastern forest of Madagascar, detected by
chloroplast and nuclear microsatellites. Annals of Botany
104: 1231-1242.
Atkinson MD (1992) Betula pendula and B. pubescens.
Journal of Ecology 80: 837-870.
Bowcock AM, Kidd JR, Mountain JL, Hebert JM,
Carotenuto L, Kidd KK, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1991) Drift,
admixture and selection in human evolution: a study with
DNA polymorphisms. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences USA 88: 839-843.
Bruschi P, Vendramin G, Bussotti F, Grossoni P (2003)
morphological and molecular diversity among Italian
Populations of Quercus petraea. Annals of Botany 91:
707-716
Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power
analysis of two tests for detecting recent population
bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:
2001-2014.
Dirienzo A, Peterson AC, Garca JC, Valdes AM, Slatkin
M (1994) Mutational processes of simple sequence repeats
in human populations. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences USA 91: 3166-3170.
509
1393 $%/4 # /!" / <%FB
E
O
%V
P-value
P-value
( j8
P-value
!>
-F( z <%X < r CF^ $
&(%) TPM iWe &(% F S D )) .(Dirienzo et al. 1994) ZN (>T%
(<% F< F %% ;WH `Le
-% [ (H D )) ()< (% (H
`Le K "D RST <;)" e H
(H f) i< qV $7 ((" K .H e
.(Freeland 2005) B M #(H !
$
%
H !>
`$O Z)% g F ()! >)(
L< W % (F% Y, \] %W
7 $``[ < F { <L 48 .(L% X? (H
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction
to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK.-Freeland JR (2005) Molecular Ecology.
John Wiley and Sons Press, England, 63-106.
Gupta AK, Rai MK, Phulwaria M, Shekhawat NS (2011)
Isolation of genomic DNA suitable for community
analysis from mature trees adapted to arid environment.
Gene 487: 56-159.
Hamrick JL, Godt M, Sherman-Broyles SL (1992) Factors
influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant
species. New Forests 6: 95-124.
Hartl DL, Clark AG (1997) Principles of Population
Genetics. Sunderland, Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates,
USA.
Howland D, Oliver RP, Davy AJ (1991) A method of
extraction of DNA from Birch. Plant Molecular Biology
Reporter 9: 340-344.
Kulju KM, Pekkinen M, Varvio S (2003) Twenty-three
microsatellite primer pairs for Betula pendula. Molecular
Ecology Notes 4: 471-473.
Lowe AJ, Bosier D, Ward M, Bacles C, Navarro C (2005)
Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation;
reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for
neotropical trees. Heredity 95:255-273.
Martin C, Parra T, Clemente-Munoz M, HernandezBermejo JE (2008) Genetic diversity and structure of the
endangered Betula pendula subsp. fontqueri populations in
the south of Spain. Silva Fennica 42: 487-498.
Matus IA, Hayes PM (2002) Genetic diversity in three
groups of barley germplasm assessed by simple sequence
repeat. Genome 45: 1095-1106.
Merila J, Crokrak P (2001) Comparison of genetic
differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits.
Journal of Evolutionary. Biology 14: 892-903.
Morand ME, Brachet S, Rossignol P, Dufour J, Frascaria
Lacoste N (2002) a generalized heterozygote deficiency
assessed with microsatellites in French common ash
populations. Molecular Ecology 11: 377- 385.
Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations.
American Naturalist 106: 283-292.
Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia
University Press, New York, USA.
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) Genalex 6, genetic analysis
in excels population genetic software for teaching and
research. Molecular Ecology 6: 288-295.
Peakall R, Smouse PE, Huff DR (1995) Evolutionary
implications of allozyme and RAPD Variation in diploid
populations of dioecious buffalograss Buchloe dactyloides.
Molecular Ecology 4: 135-147.
Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) Bottleneck: a
computer program for detecting recent reductions in the
... (Betula pendula Roth) ' )J
< 68 ;&<
effective population size using allele frequency data.
Journal of Heredity 90: 502-503.
Porebski S, Bailey L, Baum R (1997) Modification of a
CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high
polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant
Molecular Biology Reporter 15: 8-15
Omidi M, Farzin N (2012) Biotechnology approaches for
improvement of medicinal plants. Modern Genetics
Journal 4: 209-220. (In Farsi).
Rasmussen KK, Kollmann J (2008) Low genetic diversity
in small peripheral populations of a rare European tree
(Sorbus torminalis) dominated by clonal reproduction.
Conservation Genetics 9:1533-1539
Robledo Arnuncio JJ, Collada C, Alia R, Gil1 L (2005)
Genetic structure of montane isolates of Pinus sylvestris L.
in a Mediterranean refugial area. Journal of Biogeography
32: 595-605.
Salehi Shanjani P, Vendramin GG (2007) Genetic
differentiation between generations of beech (Fagus
orientalis) populations in Caspian forests. Iranian Journal
of Biology 20: 1-14. (In Farsi).
Streiff R, Labbe T, Bacilieri R, Steinkellner H, Glossl J,
Kremer A (1998) Within population genetic structure in
Quercus robur and Quercus petraea assessed with
microsatellites. Molecular Ecology 7: 317-328.
Thormann CE, Ferreira ME, Camargo LEA, Tivanga JG
(1994) Comparison of RFLP and RAPD to estimating
genetic relationships within and among cruciferous
species. Theoretical Appliaed Genetic 88: 973-980.
Tsuda Y, Goto S, Ide Y (2004) RAPD analysis of genetic
variation within and among four natural populations of
Betula maximowicziana. Silvae Genetica 53: 234-239.
Tsuda Y, Sawada H, Takafumi O, Katsuhiro N, Hiroki N,
Yuji I (2010) Landscape genetic structure of Betula
maximowicziana in the Chichibu mountain range, central
Japan. Tree Genetics and Genomes 6:377-387.
Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations.
Genetics 16: 97-159.
Zane L, Bargelloni L (2002) Strategies for microsatellite
isolation: a review. Molecular Ecology 11: 1-16.
Zyryanova O (2010) White birch trees as resource species
of Russia. Their distribution, ecophysiological, features,
multiple utilizations. Eurasian Journal of Forest Research
13: 25-40.
Zolfaghari R, Akbarinia M, Mardi M, Ghanati F (2009)
Genetic diversity in Persian oak (Quercus branti) from
Kohkiluye and Boyerahmad using SSR. Iranian Journal of
Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic
Research 16: 172-182 (In Farsi).
1393 $% /4 # /!" / 510

SALIENT FEATURE

d〝ﾆｧ 3 4-29 30-54 55 -82 83-109 110 -136 137 -159 160

傈劤抟僤 չ.BST պفٖأٔٔ٦أխխխխխխ խ1VCMJTIFE PO "QS