537 Vol. 36, pp. 537ῒ544, 2008 1 1 1 # !"#$1 2 1 $ %3 ! 1 1 &3 ! %& ' 1 " 1 3 '# 1 ῎( : ) 20 11 * 29 ῏ +, 45 -.( 2007 10 * 12 /0 10 123456789:4;<=4>) ?@=AB( C?(DA) E 12 !"F#GHF$I ῌAF῍ ?JKBBK%?LM (DAB( 10 * 15 N&O.F$I6'PQ(RF#GST)UV*WXYZ[ΐ ῌ#\]^_) ῍ `+?abAB( `+ab4cd06?@=ABBKWXY Z[HefF#G?S,A)UAB( - 30 .44>) +g,hiABBK) j4kk /0AB( )UF#GS,lm) 4n4F#G,Fo1& ῌVT῍ pqr2s QRS 3 414&OHtuB( vw&O4xy,zluB9 ῐ789:4;<=ῑ 4'{? VT | }) ~56HF#+6 ῌEPS῍ ? /AB( 10 * 25 EPS H,7 e4.Fo14986!&rB( 10 * 30 dual chamber RJRI ῌICD῍ ?( 419H AF VT 4:,,uAzluB( ;>) VT & O6'P7ef4 ICD O?<K) F=F#GS,N VT 4o$)"1>9*6 P9<rB( ?16S,rBWXYZ[6N) @.Fo144> 6 AF 4&9<HB( VT 4o$)"91>6zuB) j4F$1>6N AF 9!&r9ArB( Fo14) Q( )UF#¡) F$I 4«9&O.4C¬DDE?F6A©}( ®f ¯*,) j4NzGH?°±P²IA©JK DB4H) ¢£9¤ml4+g?<¥B zQ(RF#GST)UV*WXYZ[ΐ ῌ 6F#G4S,9H¦§,¨K©ªz;) j #\]^_) ῍ 4S,) JRI ῌimplantable cardioveter defibrillator; ICD῍ S,N ) F$I ῌ³´ AF LP῍ 4'{9Fo14 1 N = ῌ¸¹=῍ 2 O+ 3 "º»P¼QN = ῌ¸¹=῍ ῌ³´ VT LP῍ 41>o$)"6N9 ArB+?µ¶AB4HM·P( 25 ·¸¹º 538 : 45 ῍ ῌ : ῌ »#±¼ T. P 6.8gdl῍ T. bil 0.4 mgdl῍ GOT 75IUl῍ GPT 119IUl῍ LDH 215IUl῍ ALP 303IUl῍ gGTP 274IUl῍ BUN 16.2mgdl῍ Cr 0.79 mgdl῍ U. A 5.7 mgdl῍ Na 141 mEql῍ K 3.7 mEql῍ Cl : amlodipine 5 mg῍ losartan 50 108 mEql῍ Mg 2.0 mgdl῍ Glu 105 mgdl mgday ῌ CRP 0.03 mg dl TSH 1.39 mU ml atrovastatin 5 mgday ῌ 0.4363.78῍ T3 3.9 pgml 2.14.1῍ T4 1.3 ngdl : ῌ ῌ : 2007 10 10 #$%&' o ()* 1.01.7῍ BNP 58.3 pgmlῌ !" )*+,'( Fig. 3: s +῍ ,-*.ῌ /0, 5440 mm῍ 5 +12 12῍ 3 12 45678 AF ,9:;..; 14 mm῍ EF51῍ EA0.82῍ DcT <=,>?12.ῌ 2 +#@AB5C8 196 msec῍ s E[ 8ῌ < = , 1 2 . & D E F @ G H I 2 5t῍ s, ;.ῌ op aprindine 100 mg῍ J2 pilsicainide 100 mg KL ¡pw.ῌ + 24 MN#OPQD.ῌ R -./01'(: 3 12 4567: PQ M STUV WXYZ[,\].ῌ 80 msec῍ I῍ II῍ III῍a VF ῍ V46 4 8 ST ¢ jῌ : ^_ 172 cm῍ `a 92 kg῍ BMI A-H M: 50 msec῍ H-V M: 43 msec῍ Wencke- 31.1῍ 149103 mmHg῍ b 135 H῍ c bach rate: 180 ppm῍ jump-up £¤ῌ Fast path- 5de῍ feghiEῌ jklῌ way ¥4¡¦§¥4,¨.ῌ X Fig. 1: 5cmn 53῍ op5qr 3 5©ª J£,«wQ¬ VT stῌ uvw῍ cxy,z{i|}~ ®S¯5C Nj Vf : &A°F.ῌ ± ῌ jtTῌ 6²³C 200J 8OPῌ 12 Fig. 1: HR95-150῍ 5Cῌ Adenosine 10 mg iv 8 ATP )1 !"#$ Fig. 2: ῍ PQ pathway M PQ 80msecῌ | fast ¥4¡´F῍ A-H M: 125 msec῍ H-V M: 29 msec : A-H M¡ .ῌ µ %&'(: WBC 8.310 ml῍ RBC 5.310 3 PQ M 127 msec 8w.ῌ 6 ml῍ Hgb 15.7gdl῍ Hct 46.9῍ Plt20.2104ml UVWXYZ8 °F.!¶ QRS "b wide Figure 1. Chest X-ray films and electrocardiograms at the first medical examination. 26 AF 1 Figure 2. Portable transtelephonic electrogram. Portable transtelephonic electrogram can store 30 seconds of data per event. This shows a portable transtelephonic electrogram during sinus rhythm. Figure 3. Echocardiograms. A: Parasternal long-axis view: IVSTd῎PWTdῌ12 mm῎14 mm, LVDd῎Dsῌ54 mm῎40 mm, and EFῌ51῍ B: Apical 3-chamber view: E῎Aῌ0.82, DcT ῌ 196 msec, and E῎E[ῌ9.5 27 539 540 ¡¢ : QRS tachycardia῍ ῌ ῏῎῍ῌ: ῌFig. 4῍ '( ! "#$%& ῌFig. 5῍ῌ ) 30 *+,-./0῎ 12 !῍ 34456 ῌ '(7 89%&:῍ ;7897<=>?@A .BC QRS D=>EF"Gῌ H:I JKLMIJNOKLP?QR -. wide QRS tachycardia %& S?: VT P Vf MET-.UVWMGῌ S!X Figure 4. Portable transtelephonic electrograph ῌCardiophone῍. Portable transtelephonic electrograph ῌCardiophone῍ is a compact device ῌmass: 63ῒ24ῒ 106.5 mm; weight: 120 g῍. In use, hold cardiophone in the right hand, place the probe’s electrodes to a point close to the heart, push button, record an electrocardiogram, and make a phone call to the host computer at the hospital with the acoustic coupler held to transmission part of the phone, which stores the electrocardiogram and print it as soon as the computer receives the electrocardiogram over the phone. YZ["7\8]T^[_YῌEPS῍`a_Y5 b? ῌ cd: 2 efg EPS "῎ ῏ 3 h 7<ijklmnopqMrst#uv7 <=>MwE῍ 7<x/yzwEῌ 4῍ ῎ ῐ o{|+"}.+,W7<=> ῌsustained VT῍ P~+,W7<=> ῌnonsutaiend VT; NSVT῍ wEῌ ῎ ῑ7kl ῌburst k l῍ mn AF῍ 7῍ 3<W=> wEῌ -A῍ "%& =EF ῍ 3d? AF ET t"}ῌ ῍ op qrst#uv VT M[yzW /wES??῍ M?/ 1 $῍ MNO .S??῍ wide Figure 5. Portable transtelephonic electrogram during palpitation. Portable transtelephonic electrogram on the 1st day showed a wide QRS tachycardia with a heart rate of 300 beatsΐmin during palpitation. Palpitation was severe; however, the level of consciousness was clear. It lasted approximately 30 minutes. 28 AF 'QuJK¼;6 1 QRS tachycardia 541 ;!>6ῌ \]^_`~ ῍ ῍ QuJKL6 ῌFig. 5῍ῌ VT ! Vf "#$%&'( ;!Y῍ i 30 k )῍ 5 * dual chamber + ICD Ovatia DR "&Jl; 6550ῒ ῌela medical ,- USA῍ ./012ῌ ;!>6<Y ;XY6 ῌ ῍ ῎Qu ῍ carvedilol 10 mg candesartan JKL@' wide QRS 12 mg 3456ῌ 789:;< AF VT tachycardia ῌ 200 msec῍ ;!@/6ῌ =>?@ >6ῌ 89ABC* wide QRS tachycardia P' VT "D$῍ ICD EF"GHI ῌ'6Y῍ JG 300ῑ VT 6ῌ ICD "J3JKL@ VT JM 6M&PQRV[>6 QRS N'JOP$N ῌMQR῍ S'T῎ '/Y6ῌ VT 2$῍ 300 J UV$'WXY6 ῌFig. 6῍ῌ ZY ῑ῍ 30 k<7& & P[Y6\]^_` ῌFig. 7῍ab ¡¢&JM ῌmonomorphic ventricular tachy- $ VT MQR'(S cardia῍ ;!@ '῍ P£¤6 Y6 ῌ <῍ M&;!>6¥ >6cd῍ J (Sef'P[Y AF 'XY'g XY6ῌ 3 carvedilol candesartan V ¦῍ RR k§'A;!>6῎ ῏J¨ /῍ sotalol 120 mg V/6*῍ 9 BChijk 1 D 1 MQR6῎ ῐMc©3Hª&' ; VT D$EF" 2 H!<῍ "& «¬'>6'῍ 300ῑJ Jlmnopq? G ῌ ῌ M;!>6<῍ J¨2< 1:1 ῍ MQR'®[Y῍ ¯Y< EPS °±;²³´ ῍ rs+JKLtQuvw\]^_` ; AF #x\yz{' $῎ ῏J¨'@/Y6ῌ J I )61῍ῌ µ!¶·¸¹"º EPS c >6|} d῍ µ!EF;῍ EPS ;J»# 3 J Figure 6. Portable transtelephonic electrogram while ICD activated. Accelerated atrial conduction due to VT was observed. 29 ¸A¹º 542 »).¼ 3 VT VT .C AF f /C| QRS /}0~ ῌ ῍ '(* AF <& ICD H88;9 !"# wide QRS tachycardia $ ;/?῍ maximum tracking rate `F %&῍ VT '()* ,(/0<(H 89;'(0123 Vf +,(-.)/0123ῌ / ῌ e&῍ 1 FHP*` 34356789:;<(=*>0 wide QRS tachycardia '/0^N AF ?῍ ICD @AB0ῌ ;῍ VT 0)- ICD @ABC VT ,(DEFG ICD HHI$0JKHI$2 ICD HHI$ ῌFig. 6῍ 0JKHL$ <& ?!&'ῌ ῌFig. 7῍ <&῍ VT M?῍ ICD NDE GJKHI$2 ῌt;῍ OPQ&(/0<& 3:1ῐ Fig. 4 '(ῌ )!&3?JKHI 1:1 R0ST῍ .HUV(/ $2*4 120 g῍ 5I?6&῍ 0< AF W,(XY ῌ / $ ῌ63῎24῎106.5 mm῍ '(ῌ 73 5 !Z*[\]^"#<&$_`ab 8-'&῍ ; \] t c(῍ %d&' ;)9¡:;¢$£¤;¥? Me* 40ῑ90῏0)( ῌ ῍ . 3#ῌ ¦§¨<N©<&)9ª«z f!',(0 FHPgh AF !( t¬w3)HI8¤®,(/0<& )0!Z'( 2῍ ῌ )!&.f!', ;¤8$3(ῌ /HL*\] (/043῍ Hi,(f*jk^k+ ¯34!"°?±0_HI l,3?)(0123῍ FH $_(0)#$_=>'(ῌ ±!" P !?^,)mno)0123 ?4²?)³´*?'3'(ῌ “ (ῌ p῎* VT M,(/0<&῍ \]!" ; HI$2” 0?µ>4 ῌq-῍ 43rs?tuvwx;yzUV῍ 3῍ JKHI$2*¤8KHI ST῍ .H(/0 0@'(ῌ 24 0)#7? <&HP(012ῌ {B῍ Fig. 7 %V(῍ %<¶4Y·*¤8K 3῍ῑ5῍ Figure 7. Portable transtelephonic electrogram while ICD activated. 30 AF [\!"V() 1 543 ῌ @S6 ῍ ῍ P!Q@AJ/ AF (£'()¤¥ ST-T ῍ 6 ῏ E N¡@&/"῍ OF¢ J)>()ῌ 2,$?!"#$῍ cd῏ !"῍ #$% &'()*+῍ ,-./0 M& 1 2".23 B῍ T¦§UL!#$ 2V ῌ 45῍ 6'789()*+῍ 6 ()ῌ ῍ 2Rm¡SI :,;<'=()>῍ , "A ῐΐῒῑ $?!"#$@AB#:'C% &῍ 'E 2.3 F 1῎ ¨©ª¡z ῏ME NGH@v GHC%DIJ)" 36ῑ J)6῍ῌ K «P¬tPRῐ 2004ΐ2005 W+X®Y D) 56 )῍ (> ,$?!"#$'# >῎ Circ J 2006; 70 ῌSuppl. VI῍; 1391ΐ1462. )LM)NO 147 F)*PQR9@(/῍ 45 2῎ Josephson ME. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysi- 7῍ @L!) 62 F'E ology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia ῒ London, Lea & G+ 42.2ῑ J)ῌ S!@(/῍ DiMarco Febiger, 1993. JP and Philbrick JT8῍ @A!T)*῍ .KUVW 3῎ Kannel WB, Abbott RD, Savarge DD and "X.)YZ6@[ McNamara PM. Epidemiologic features of \G+'E 22ῑ>(/Uῌ chronic atrial fibrillation: The Framingham ]^_U "῍ ,$? Study. N Engl J Med 1982; 306: 1018ΐ1022. !"#$PQR9G+`U 4῎ Wolf PA, Benjmin EJ, Belanger AJ, Kannel 2,Iῌ WB, Levy D and D[Agostino RB. Secular K)῍ ab-cd῍ .@#$ trends in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation, e/C%f0g-h6",$ the Framingham Study. Am Heart J 1996; 131: ?!"#$1 i 223L!)ῌ 1j4*I 790ΐ795. klT῍ mn5o(Up 5῎ ¨©ª¡z ῏P¯)6 ῌZ[῍ «P¬t qrstu῍ m6;v@wUwx7῍ 89yz {:|*}~j8Ul ;῍ <=>U? !"$%ῌC%I PRῐ 2005 W+X®Y>῎ Circ J 2006. !)ῌ 6῎ Shimada M, Akaishi M, Asakura K, Baba A, !U2῍ Iwanaga S, Asakura Y, Miyazaki T, Mitamura 6@K@ H and Ogawa S. Usefulness of the newly J/UU2῍ p98A{'B developed transtelephonic electrocardiogram (CD῍ %OD8L!/U and computer-supported response system. ῌ (I(῍ S!@EFGHL!/U Cardiol 1996; 27: 211ΐ217. I@U/bPQR9JK @A iL 26 7῎ °±A\῍ ²]^{῍ ²]_`῍ &abc῍ "L! ]d³῍ e]´µ῍ ¶·f῍ ·¸g¹: )* )ῌ 'ºh6 1949. F῏῍ ,$?!"#$ VT῍ 8῎ DiMarco JP and Philbrick JT. Use of ambulatory electrocardiographic ῌHolter῍ monitoring. 6;/@A 2'()M@ 6 @»#Y¼ =῎ M®῍ 2003; 80: 1945ΐ ῌ῏῎῍ AF C%& J '(῍ Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 53ΐ68. 31 544 ῍ΐ῏῎ ῑῒῐ ῌ Abstract Portable Transtelephonic Electrograph Identified the Underlying Cause of Atrial Fibrillation Hiromitsu Sekizuka1, Naoki Matsumoto2, Yukako Ishikawa1, Kihei Yoneyama1, Satoshi Nishio1, Yoshiyuki Watanabe1, Shounosuke Ryu1, Keizou Osada1, Ryouji Kishi1, Emi Nakano3, Hisao Matsuda3, Tomoo Harada3, and Fumihiko Miyake1 A 45-year-old male felt faint while driving around 10:00 o[clock on October 12; after that, he su#ered from palpitation. He was diagnosed as having atrial fibrillation ῌAF῍ from the results of 12-lead electrocardiography performed at the clinic near his house. He was referred to our hospital. From October 15, the patient started to use portable transtelephonic electrograph ῌPTE῍. On the same day, PTE recorded and transmitted the electrocardiograms several times due to palpitation occurring before sleep. After he was relieved from approximately 30-minute palpitation, he went to sleep. PTE showed prolonged QRS duration during palpitation. He had no history of syncope. However, he felt faint while driving. Accordingly, he was suspected as having ventricular tachycardia ῌVT῍ and was admitted to our hospital for electrophysiological study ῌEPS῍. On October 25, EPS induced sustained VT. On October 30, the dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator ῌICD῍ was implanted. At this point, the relationship between AF and VT was not fully clarified. After admission, ICD was frequently used due to VT. The intracardiac electrocardiograms showed greater intraventricular conduction shortening with increased pacing output. PTE, which was recorded at the same time, demonstrated the onset of AF after nonsustained VT. We concluded that a shorter intraventricular conduction time with increased pacing output triggered AF. 1 Division of Cardiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine 2 Division of Pharmacology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine 3 Division of Cardiology, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital 32
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc