published online Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 53 (2), 2014, i-xiv. Modena Aciculid land snails (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda, Cyclophoroidea) from the Zanclean (early Pliocene) of Balze di Caspreno (central Italy) Giuseppe Manganelli, Simone Cianfanelli, Debora Barbato & Andrea Benocci G. Manganelli, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell’Ambiente, Università di Siena, Via Mattioli 4, I-53100 Siena, Italy; [email protected] S. Cianfanelli, Museo di Storia Naturale (Zoologia), Università di Firenze, Via Romana 17, I-50125 Firenze, Italy D. Barbato, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell’Ambiente, Università di Siena, Via Mattioli 4, I-53100, Siena, Italy A. Benocci, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell’Ambiente, Università di Siena, Via Mattioli 4, I-53100, Siena, Italy KEY WORDS - Gastropods, Tuscany, Pliocene, Zanclean, Acicula kadolskyi n. sp. ABSTRACT - Five species of aciculids are reported herein from the Zanclean (early Pliocene) of Balze di Caspreno (Tuscany, central Italy): one belongs to the genus Acicula Hartmann, 1821, three to Platyla Moquin-Tandon, 1856 and one to Renea Nevill, 1880. Statistical analysis (PCA and RDA) was performed on ten shell variables to test the taxonomic assignment of four of the taxa, in order to compare them with relevant recent species. Caspreno Acicula differs from similar taxa by virtue of its more evident external peristomal varix, smaller size and lower H/D ratio; RDA confirmed its distinction from other congeners: it is therefore assigned to a new species: Acicula kadolskyi n. sp. The largest taxon, Caspreno Platyla, represented by only a few very fragmentary shells, is tentatively assigned to P. dupuyi (Paladilhe, 1868) by virtue of shell size and shape and structure of the external peristomal varix. The other two taxa of Caspreno Platyla are assigned to P. gracilis (Clessin, 1877) and P. similis (Reinhardt, 1880); RDA confirmed that no significant statistical difference exists between recent and fossil populations of the two species. Caspreno Renea, represented by only very fragmentary shells, is tentatively identified as R. veneta (Pirona, 1865) due to its conical shape and dense ribbing. This conclusion is not supported by RDA, possibly due to the fragmentary state of the material which made it impossible to measure some important shell variables. Apart from A. kadolskyi n. sp., the other species are still extant. Two of these (P. gracilis and R. cf. veneta) are reported for the first time as fossils and the other two (P. cf. dupuyi and P. similis) for the first time from the Pliocene of central Italy, although one of them (P. cf. dupuyi) had previously been recorded from the Fossil Forest of Dunarobba, based on misidentified material of P. similis. RIASSUNTO - [Gli aciculidi (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda, Cyclophoroidea) del Pliocene inferiore delle Balze di Caspreno (Italia centrale)] - Il sito pliocenico delle Balze di Caspreno (Siena, Italia centrale) presenta una ricca malacofauna non-marina, comprendente tra l’altro cinque aciculidi: una specie di Acicula Hartmann, 1821, tre di Platyla Moquin-Tandon, 1856 e una di Renea Nevill, 1880. Al fine di definire meglio il loro inquadramento tassonomico sono state effettuate, quando possibile, analisi statistiche (PCA e RDA) su dieci variabili conchiliari, confrontando specie fossili e attuali. L’Acicula di Caspreno differisce da specie simili per un cercine peristomale ben marcato, minori dimensioni e minor rapporto H/D; poiché anche l’RDA conferma la sua distinzione, è stata assegnata a una nuova specie: Acicula kadolskyi n. sp. La più grande delle Platyla, rappresentata soltanto da pochi esemplari molto frammentari, è stata identificata come P. cf. dupuyi (Paladilhe, 1868) sulla base delle dimensioni e della struttura del cercine peristomale. Le altre due Platyla sono state assegnate a P. gracilis (Clessin, 1877) e P. similis (Reinhardt, 1880); per entrambe, l’RDA non ha infatti evidenziato differenze statisticamente significative tra popolazioni recenti e fossili. L’ultima specie, rappresentata soltanto da materiali frammentari, è stata identificata come R. cf. veneta per la forma conica e la fitta costolatura. Questa conclusione non è supportata dall’RDA; tuttavia ciò potrebbe essere dovuto al fatto che lo stato del materiale non ha consentito di includere nelle analisi alcune importanti misure conchiliari. Tranne A. kadolskyi n. sp., tutte le altre specie sono ancora esistenti. Per due di queste specie (P. gracilis e R. cf. veneta) si tratta della prima segnalazione allo stato fossile, mentre per le altre due (P. cf. dupuyi e P. similis) del primo ritrovamento per il Pliocene dell’Italia centrale, sebbene P. cf. dupuyi fosse già stata segnalata per la Foresta Fossile di Dunarobba, sulla base di un’erronea determinazione di conchiglie appartenenti a P. similis. INTRODUCTION The non marine malacofauna of Balze di Caspreno is one of the most important from the Neogene of Apennine Italy (De Stefani, 1876-80; Manganelli & Giusti, 1997, 2000; Manganelli et al., 2008, 2011). It is very diversified, especially rich in land snails, and older than all the other Neogene land and freshwater molluscan assemblages of central-southern Italy, such as those from Umbria and Latium (Manganelli et al., 2008). It includes nine species of land operculate prosobranch gastropods: one species of cochlostomids (Cochlostoma esuanum Manganelli & Giusti, 1997), five species of aciculids, which are the subject of this article, and three other species (a hydrocoenid, a craspedopomatid and a pomatiid) which will be the subject of a future paper. ISSN 0375-7633 The aciculids are a small group of minute, cryptic, cylindrical-shelled, litter- and soil-dwelling operculate snails, endemic to the western Palaearctic. Their taxonomy is based exclusively on shell characters, though their phylogenetic significance has never been proved. The ca. 70 recent species recognized are assigned to four genera (Acicula Hartmann, 1821, Menkia Boeters, Gittenberger & Subai, 1985, Platyla Moquin-Tandon, 1856 and Renea Nevill, 1880) mainly distinguished on the basis of shell sculpture. Anatomical studies have only been performed in a few species and have not provided any character useful for genus and species taxonomy, because of the simplification and homogeneity of the genitalia and other internal organs (Creek, 1954; Jackiewicz, 1967; Bodon & Boato, 1987; Boeters et al., 1989; Bodon, 1994; Bodon & Cianfanelli, 2008). The shell characters of taxonomic doi:10.4435/BSPI.2014.07 ii Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 53 (2), 2014 interest for species distinction are shape and size, presence vs. absence of sculpture (collabral grooves and ribs; spiral grooves), presence vs. absence and structure of the external peristomal varix and sinulus. The split at species level is high and most species are distinguished by very weak characters, scored by qualitative analysis (no quantitative studies on intraspecific/interspecific variability are reported). Acicula includes 26 extant (seven with fossil record) and nine fossil species ranging from Oligocene to Pliocene (Boeters et al., 1989; Bodon, 1994; Stworzewicz & Soltys, 1996; Bertrand, 2004; Kadolsky, 2008; Subai, 2009); Menkia includes three extant species and one from the Pliocene of Celleneuve (Boeters et al., 1989); Platyla includes 30 extant (four with fossil record) and six fossil species ranging from Eocene to Pliocene (Boeters et al., 1989; Ambrosetti et al., 1995; Cianfanelli et al., 2000; Ciangherotti et al., 2007; Bodon & Cianfanelli, 2008; Subai, 2009; Torres Alba, 2012); Renea includes eleven extant (one with fossil record) and four fossil species ranging from Oligocene to Pliocene (Boeters et al., 1989; Stworzewicz & Soltys, 1996; Ciangherotti & Esu, 2005; Niero et al., 2012). GEOLOGICAL SETTING Fossils were collected in the 1980-1990s along the Arbia River (Montaperti-Pianella area, northern sector of the Neogene Siena Basin), where continental deposits were exposed discontinuously in small scattered outcrops (Fig. 1). Now most of them are covered by recent alluvial deposits, vegetation or rubble from quarries. The best sections of continental deposits crop out in natural cliffs Fig. 1 - Location map of the studied area. a) Structural setting of southern Tuscany. b) Geological sketch of the Montaperti-Pianella area. Numbers (1-6) indicate sites sampled during the 1990s. Most of these outcrops are now covered by recent alluvial deposits, vegetation or dumped rubble. G. Manganelli et alii - Aciculids from Tuscan Zanclean iii on the left bank of the Arbia river (Balze di Caspreno, fossiliferous sites 5 and 6 in Fig. 1b). These sediments are indicative of a generic fluvial setting, with dominantly clayey floodplain silts (locally containing peat horizons) and fine sands, with subordinate lens-shaped bodies of gravelly fluvial sand (Martini et al., 2011). The age of these deposits has long been debated (see Manganelli et al., 2011 for details and references). According to Martini et al. (2011), integrated palaeontological and stratigraphic analysis of the continental and marine succession exposed in the surrounding area enables assignment of these deposits to the MPl3 Zone of planktonic foraminifera zonation (zonal scheme of Foresi et al., 2001). Most specimens studied were collected in site 2 (UTM ref. ED50: X = 1696279 Y = 4802046), about 200 m from the right bank of the Arbia River, exposed during quarrying in the 1980-1990s but now covered by vegetation. A few additional specimens came from site 4 (UTM ref. ED50: X = 1696551Y = 4801725) exposed on the right bank and on the bed of the Arbia River in the early 1990s and now covered by recent alluvial deposits and vegetation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Taxonomy The monograph by Boeters et al. (1989) is the standard basis for the taxonomy and systematics of the family Aciculidae. Subsequent major contributions have been published by Bodon (1994), Stworzewicz & Soltys (1996), Cianfanelli et al. (2000), Bertrand (2004), Ciangherotti & Esu (2005), Bodon & Cianfanelli (2008), Kadolsky (2008), Subai (2009) and Niero et al. (2012). Dimensions Dimensions were measured to the nearest 0.01 mm, using Wild M5A and Leica M205 C microscopes. Ten variables were considered: shell height (SH), last antepenultimate whorl height (L-AWH), last - penultimate whorl height (L-PWH), last whorl height (LWH), aperture height (AH), shell diameter (SD), aperture width (AD), last whorl diameter (LWD), penultimate whorl diameter (PWD), antepenultimate whorl diameter (AWD) (Fig. 2). Statistical analysis Redundancy analysis (RDA; ter Braak, 1986) was used to detect possible multivariate relationships between shell variables and the taxonomic assignment of four out of five Caspreno aciculids, comparing them with relevant recent species. For each fossil species the most complete specimens available were considered (see Tab. 1); for living species, five populations (each represented by five specimens) for each taxon were evaluated except in the case of two Renea species for which only one population was available (for the list of living populations examined, see Appendix). The factor “species” was used as constraint factor. A preliminary Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed in order to detect the degree of correlation between shell variables and their role in explaining variability. Data was log-transformed before performing statistical analysis. An ANOVA-like permutation test for constrained ordination was used to assess the significance (p-value) of the “species” constraint Fig. 2 - Dimensional variables considered for statistical analysis: shell height (SH), last - antepenultimate whorl height (L-AWH), last - penultimate whorl height (L-PWH), last whorl height (LWH), aperture height (AH), shell diameter (SD), aperture diameter (AD), last whorl diameter (LWD), penultimate whorl diameter (PWD), antepenultimate whorl diameter (AWH). Shell figure reproduced from Boeters et al. (1989) with permission. for the first two RDA axes. RDA was performed using the software R 3.0.2 (R Development Core Team, 2013), and the package vegan (Oksanen et al., 2006). Acronyms FGC: F. Giusti Collection, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell’Ambiente, Università di Siena (Siena, Italy); GMC: G. Manganelli Collection, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell’Ambiente, Università di Siena (Siena, Italy); MBC: M. Bodon Collection (Genova, Italy); MZUF GC: Museo di Storia Naturale, Collezione Gasteropodi Continentali, Università di Firenze (Firenze, Italy); RMNH.MOL.: Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum (Leiden, The Netherlands); SCC: S. Cianfanelli Collection (Firenze, Italy). iv Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 53 (2), 2014 Acicula fossils fusca (5 pop.) lineata (5 pop.) sublineata (5 pop.) szigethyannae (5 pop.) SH 2.41 ± 0.11 2.39 ± 0.17 3.13 ± 0.15 3.06 ± 0.18 3.27 ± 0.25 L-AWH 1.94 ± 0.12 1.96 ± 0.14 2.52 ± 0.09 2.40 ± 0.10 2.35 ± 0.13 L-PWH 1.57 ± 0.11 1.65 ± 0.10 2.08 ± 0.07 1.97 ± 0.08 1.89 ± 0.11 LWH 1.17 ± 0.04 1.20 ± 0.07 1.52 ± 0.05 1.43 ± 0.05 1.36 ± 0.09 AH 0.75 ± 0.03 0.73 ± 0.04 0.94 ± 0.04 0.88 ± 0.04 0.85 ± 0.05 SD 0.92 ± 0.02 0.90 ± 0.06 1.13 ± 0.05 0.99 ± 0.22 1.05 ± 0.06 AWD 0.77 ± 0.02 0.71 ± 0.05 0.89 ± 0.04 0.85 ± 0.04 0.91 ± 0.04 PWD 0.83 ± 0.03 0.78 ± 0.04 0.99 ± 0.04 0.92 ± 0.04 0.94 ± 0.04 LWD 0.83 ± 0.02 0.82 ± 0.04 1.00 ± 0.03 0.94 ± 0.04 0.93 ± 0.05 AD 0.55 ± 0.02 0.50 ± 0.04 0.65 ± 0.02 0.57 ± 0.12 0.61 ± 0.06 Platyla recent-dupuyi (1 pop.) fossil gracilis recent gracilis (5 pop.) fossil similis recent similis (5 pop.) SH 2.89 ± 0.05 2.10 ± 0.05 2.56 ± 0.15 1.83 ± 0.07 2.15 ± 0.19 L-AWH 2.39 ± 0.03 1.80 ± 0.07 2.13 ± 0.10 1.55 ± 0.05 1.71 ± 0.13 L-PWH 1.99 ± 0.02 1.52 ± 0.04 1.76 ± 0.08 1.30 ± 0.05 1.43 ± 0.08 LWH 1.46 ± 0.02 1.12 ± 0.05 1.29 ± 0.06 0.95 ± 0.03 1.06 ± 0.06 0.89 ± 0.02 0.66 ± 0.03 0.74 ± 0.03 0.58 ± 0.02 0.65 ± 0.04 SD 1.09 ± 0.03 0.86 ± 0.07 0.97 ± 0.05 0.68 ± 0.02 0.78 ± 0.05 AWD 0.91 ± 0.01 0.74 ± 0.01 0.77 ± 0.04 0.54 ± 0.02 0.59 ± 0.03 PWD 0.88 ± 0.01 0.74 ± 0.04 0.83 ± 0.04 0.61 ± 0.01 0.66 ± 0.03 LWD 0.76 ± 0.02 0.70 ± 0.10 0.84 ± 0.07 0.63 ± 0.01 0.68 ± 0.03 0.61 ± 0.03 0.52 ± 0.07 0.53 ± 0.03 0.38 ± 0.01 0.44 ± 0.02 AH AD Renea fossil-dupuyi 0.91 ± 0.04 0.64 ± 0.02 fossils berica (1 pop.) gormonti (1 pop.) veneta (5 pop.) SH 4.15 ± 0.15 3.60 ± 0.10 3.86 ± 0.22 L-AWH 2.87 ± 0.04 2.73 ± 0.05 2.87 ± 0.11 L-PWH 2.34 ± 0.05 2.20 ± 0.05 2.37 ± 0.10 LWH 1.56 ± 0.03 1.68 ± 0.03 1.61 ± 0.04 1.71 ± 0.07 AH 1.00 ± 0.05 1.03 ± 0.03 0.97 ± 0.05 1.05 ± 0.05 SD 1.35 ± 0.04 1.35 ± 0.04 1.29 ± 0.03 1.35 ± 0.06 AWD 1.10 ± 0.03 1.07 ± 0.02 1.08 ± 0.05 PWD 1.21 ± 0.04 1.16 ± 0.03 1.19 ± 0.05 LWD 1.17 ± 0.05 1.22 ± 0.04 1.16 ± 0.04 1.22 ± 0.04 AD 0.73 ± 0.03 0.76 ± 0.03 0.72 ± 0.04 0.76 ± 0.04 Tab. 1 - Mean and standard deviation of variables considered for statistical analysis; pop., population. G. Manganelli et alii - Aciculids from Tuscan Zanclean SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY Clade Caenogastropoda Cox, 1960 Informal group Architaenioglossa Haller, 1892 Superfamily Cyclophoroidea Gray, 1847 Family Aciculidae Gray, 1850 Genus Acicula Hartmann, 1821 Type species - Bulimus lineatus Draparnaud, 1801 Acicula kadolskyi n. sp. (P1. 1, figs 2-3) Diagnosis - A small sized species of Acicula with robust shell characterized by ovate-cylindrical shape, teleoconch with rather irregularly spaced collabral grooves and subsquare aperture with thick and well reflexed peristome and evident obsolete external peristomal varix. Description - Shell dextral, very small in size, ovatecylindrical in shape with about six to six and a half slightly convex whorls separated by deep sutures; last whorl about half shell height, slightly ascendent; umbilicus closed; aperture subsquare, less than one third of shell height, with thick parietal callus and evident angular tooth; peristome thick and reflexed with evident obsolete external peristomal varix slightly before peristomal margin; upper peristomal vertex, slightly re-entrant in lateral view; protoconch finely malleate; teleoconch with rather irregularly spaced collabral grooves that are closer near growth interruptions and on varix, more spaced in other parts (about 45 in penultimate whorl). Dimensions (n: four) - Holotype: SH: 2.39 mm, SD: 0.93 mm, AH: 0.72 mm, AD: 0.54 mm. Paratype MZUF GC/39607: SH: 2.36 mm, SD: 0.92 mm, AH: 0.76 mm, AD: 0.56 mm. Paratype GMC 41848a: SH: 2.56 mm, SD: 0.88 mm, AH: 0.75 mm, AD: 0.53 mm. Paratype v SCC 16363/3659: SH: 2.31 mm, SD: 0.93 mm, AH: not available, AD: not available. Type locality - Site 2, Balze di Caspreno, along Arbia River (Montaperti-Pianella area, east of Siena), lacustrine grey clays of early Pliocene age (MP13 Zone of planktonic foraminifera zonation of Foresi et al., 2001) (Fig. 1). Type material - Holotype (Pl. 1, fig. 2, MZUF GC/39606) and 89 paratypes (82 paratypes: one whole adult shell, ten juvenile shells, 71 fragmented shells consisting of 71 last whorls and six apices, GMC 41848; one paratype: whole adult shell, MZUF GC/39607; five paratypes: five fragmented shells consisting of last whorls, MZUF GC/16362; one paratype: whole adult shell, SCC 16363/3659). Paratype 39607 (Pl. 1, fig. 3) was broken during SEM work. Derivation of name - The new species is named after our friend Dietrich Kadolsky, geologist (Sanderstead, United Kingdom), a fine malacologist specialized in fossil non-marine molluscs and a leading authority on zoological nomenclature. Remarks - The size range (2.30 - 2.52 mm in height) places the Caspreno species among the small sized Acicula. This group includes very few species: Oligocene A. filifera Sandberger, 1862 and A. pseudosturani Kadolsky, 2008, Miocene A. isseli (Flach, 1889), Miocene to Recent A. fusca (Montagu, 1803) and A. parcelineata (Clessin, 1911), Pliocene A. sturani Schlickum & Strauch, 1979 and Recent A. moussoni Boettger, 1879. Other species are at the lower fringe of its size range: Oligocene A. praediezi Kadolsky, 2008, Miocene A. crassistoma Stworzewicz & Soltys, 1996 and A. diezi (Flach, 1889), or at the upper limit: Miocene and Pliocene A. edlaueri Schlikum, 1970 and Pliocene A. michaudiana Schlickum, 1975. Most of these species have an aperture with thin, EXPLANATION OF PLATE 1 Recent and fossil aciculids: species of Acicula and Renea. Fig.1 - Acicula fusca (Montagu, 1803): apertural (a) and lateral (b) views of a shell from Irun (Guipúzcoa, País Vasco, Spain), M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 1.9.1995 (MZUF GC/7560). Figs2-3- Acicula kadolskyi n. sp. from Balze di Caspreno. 2 - Holotype from Site 2 (MZUF GC/39606); apertural (a) and lateral (b) views. 3 - Paratype from Site 2 (MZUF GC/39607; this specimen was broken during SEM); apertural (a) and lateral (b) views. Fig.4 - Renea veneta (Pirona, 1865): apertural (a) and lateral (b) views of a shell from Fiume Natisone (debris), Paderno (Premariacco, Udine, Italy), M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 28.12.1990 (MZUF GC/3571). Figs5-9- Renea cf. veneta (Pirona, 1865) from Balze di Caspreno. 5 - Apertural view of an incomplete shell consisting of apex and first whorls (MZUF GC/39609a). 6 - Apertural view of an incomplete shell consisting of last whorl (MZUF GC/39609b). 7-8- Lateral views of two incomplete shells consisting of last whorl (MZUF GC/16361a-b). 9 - Lateral view of an incomplete shell consisting of last whorl (MZUF GC/39609c). Scale bar: 1 mm. vi Pl. 1 Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 53 (2), 2014 G. Manganelli et alii - Aciculids from Tuscan Zanclean non reflexed peristome and lack any external peristomal varix (see Boeters et al., 1989; Stworzewicz & Soltys, 1996; Kadolsky, 2008). Only A. crassistoma and A. michaudiana have an aperture with thick and slightly reflexed peristome and A. michaudiana also a marked external peristomal varix. A. kadolskyi is distinguished from the former (A. crassistoma) by virtue of larger size, external almost parallel to columellar peristome and more numerous collabral grooves, and from the latter (A. michaudiana) by virtue of smaller size, ovate-cylindrical shell shape and presence of an evident angular tooth (see for A. crassistoma and A. michaudiana, Boeters et al., 1989; Stworzewicz & Soltys, 1996). Finally, another species with unknown aperture, A. isseli is distinguished by its very slender shell shape (see Boeters et al., 1989; Stworzewicz & Soltys, 1996). The Caspreno Acicula shares the evident obsolete external peristomal varix with other species: A. benoiti (Bourguignat, 1864) from Sicily, A. corcyrensis (Boettger, 1883) from Greece, A. hausdorfi Boeters, Gittenberger & Subai, 1989 from Greece, A. multilineata Boeters, Gittenberger & Subai, 1989 from Greece and A. vezzani Bodon, 1994 from Liguria. All have larger size, higher H/D ratio and three (A. hausdorfi, A. multilineata and A. vezzani) also have much more numerous collabral grooves. Other taxa occurring in central southern Europe have a sligthly developed external peristomal varix: A. lineata sublineata (Andreae, 1883) from northern Italy, A. lineolata banki Boeters, Gittenberger & Subai, 1989 from northern Italy, A. lineolata lineolata (Pini, 1884) from central Europe and A. szigethyannae Subai, 1977 from peninsular Italy and Dalmatia (Boeters et al., 1989; Bodon et al., 1995). They constitute a group of similar taxa, from which A. kadolskyi is distinguished by virtue of its much more evident external peristomal varix, smaller size and lower H/D ratio. vii Taxonomic setting was tested analysing statistically the relationships between Caspreno Acicula and living A. fusca, A. lineata lineata, A. lineata sublineata and A. szigethyannae (for the list of living populations examined, see Appendix). RDA 1 (P<0.01) separated two main groups of taxa: A. fusca and A. kadolskyi on one hand and A. szigethyannae, A. lineata sublineata and A. lineata lineata on the other, confirming the relationships previously proposed (Fig. 3). PCA revealed that size was the first determinant of shell morphological variance since PC1 (91%) was a positive combination of all variables: indeed, fusca and kadolskyi are smaller than the group of similar taxa formed by lineata, sublineata and szigethyanne. As stated above, the former two are easily distinguished by the external peristomal varix, absent in fusca and very marked in kadolskyi. The present report is the first of an Acicula species from the Pliocene of peninsular Italy. On the other hand, species of Acicula have already been reported from the Pliocene of northern Italy (as A. cf. lineata: Sacco, 1887; or A. lineata: Ciangherotti et al., 2007), however their taxonomic setting should be revised because it is possible that they belong to the Caspreno species. Genus Platyla Moquin-Tandon, 1856 Type species - Acme dupuyi Paladilhe, 1868 Platyla cf. dupuyi (Paladilhe, 1868) (Pl. 2, figs 7-9) Material examined - nine specimens from site 2 (five specimens: five fragmented shells consisting of five apertural fragments, GMC 41849; four specimens: two Fig. 3 - Redundancy analysis (RDA) performed on fossil Acicula from Balze di Caspreno (A. kadolskyi) and living Acicula species (A. fusca, A. lineata lineata, A. lineata sublineata and A. szigethyannae). The first two RDA axes (RDA 1 and RDA 2) were both significant for P<0.01 and explained 73% and 2% of the variation, respectively. viii Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 53 (2), 2014 fragmented shells consisting of the first whorls and two fragmented shells consisting of the last whorls, MZUF GC/16359). Remarks - Platyla includes recent and fossil aciculids having smooth shells (apart from a few growth lines) without collabral or spiral sculpture (Boeters et al., 1989). These species can be roughly distinguished into three groups, without taxonomic value, on the basis of absence/ presence and structure of external peristomal varix. The first group is characterized by absence of an external peristomal varix; the second group is characterized by an external peristomal varix without clear proximal delimitation; the third group is characterized by an external peristomal varix having a marked proximal delimitation. Two of the three Platyla species from Caspreno belong to the second group; the other belongs to the third group. The largest Caspreno Platyla, represented by a few fragmentary specimens, is a medium-sized species characterized by a cylindrical-conical shell and a weak external peristomal varix (Pl. 2, figs 8-9; Tab. 1). Platyla species sharing these features include the Eocene P. eocaena (Oppenheim, 1895), Miocene P. callosa (Boettger, 1870) and Recent P. curtii (Wagner, 1912), P. dupuyi (Paladilhe, 1868), P. orthostoma (Jackiewicz, 1979), P. peloponnesica Boeters, Gittenberger & Subai, 1989, P. procax Boeters, Gittenberger & Subai, 1989, P. similis (Reinhardt, 1880) and P. wilhelmi (Wagner, 1910). Excluding Eocene P. eocaena, cylindrical shelled P. orthostoma, obese shelled P. procax and small sized P. similis, distinction among the remaining species is not easy. P. dupuyi seems to match the Caspreno material best and hence it was tentatively assigned to this entity. The other species seem to have a more (P. wilhelmi) or less (P. curtii and P. peloponnesica) evident sinulus or a slightly marked external peristomal varix (P. callosa). P. dupuyi has a west European distribution restricted to France and extreme northern Spain (Boeters et al., 1989; Bank, 2011). It has been reported (as P. cf. dupuyi) from the Pliocene of Fossil Forest of Dunarobba (Ambrosetti et al., 1995), but re-examination of the specimen suggests that it belongs to P. similis. Other Platyla material reported from the middle Pliocene of northern Italy (as P. cf. callosa: Ciangherotti et al., 2007) might belong to the same species as the specimens from Caspreno. Platyla gracilis (Clessin, 1877) (P1. 2, figs 4-6) Material examined - Sixty specimens from site 2 (52 specimens: 1 whole adult shell, 2 juvenile shells, 49 fragmented shells consisting of 49 last whorls and 4 apices, GMC 41850; 2 specimens: 2 whole adult shells, MZUF GC/39610; 1 specimen: whole adult shell, MZUF GC/20123; 4 specimens: 4 fragmented shells consisting of last whorls, MZUF GC/20122; 1 specimen: fragmented shell consisting of last whorl, SCC 16365/3659). Remarks - This small to medium sized Platyla belongs to the group of species characterized by a cylindrical or cylindrical-conical shell with an evident external peristomal varix (in section, very high proximally, resembling a step, and gently curved distally) which ends in the umbilical area where it may form a more or less evident basal auricle. This group includes large species with slender conical shell, having an oblique aperture, such as P. banatica (Rossmässler, 1842) and P. pinteri Boeters, Gittenberger & Subai, 1989; medium to large species with cylindrical-conical shell having vertical aperture and often an evident basal auricle, such as P. elisabethae (Pintér & Szigethy, 1973), P. falkneri Boeters, Gittenberger & Subai, 1989, P. foliniana (Nevill, 1879), P. subdiaphana (Bivona, 1839) and P. talentii Bodon & Cianfanelli, 2008; an array of poorly characterized, small to medium species with cylindrical or cylindrical-conical shell and vertical aperture with slightly evident or absent basal auricle, such as P. alta (Clessin, 1911), P. callostoma (Clessin, 1911), P. gracilis (Clessin, 1877), P. maasseni Boeters, Gittenberger & Subai, 1989, P. pezzolii Boeters, EXPLANATION OF PLATE 2 Recent and fossil aciculids: Platyla species. Figs1-3- Platyla similis (Reinhardt, 1880). 1 - Apertural (a) and lateral (b) views of a shell from Torrente Turrita Secca (debris) (Castelnuovo in Garfagnana, Lucca, Italy), M. Calcagno, S. Cianfanelli, G. Manganelli & L. Manganelli leg. 1.11.1998 (SCC 9630/1868). 2-3- Apertural (a) and lateral (b) views of two shells from Site 2 of Balze di Caspreno (MZUF GC/39611a-b). Figs4-6- Platyla gracilis (Clessin, 1877). 4 -Apertural (a) and lateral (b) views of a shell from Montepaldi (San Casciano Val di Pesa, Florence, Italy), P. Agnelli & S. Cianfanelli leg. 22.7.1993 (SCC 4386/754). 5-6- Apertural (a) and lateral (b) views of two shells from Site 2 of Balze di Caspreno (MZUF GC/39610a-b). Fig.7 - Platyla dupuyi (Paladilhe, 1868): apertural (a) and lateral (b) views of a shell from Mount Pons (France), 1882 (Paulucci Collection, MZUF GC/10976). Figs8-9- Platyla cf. dupuyi (Paladilhe, 1868) from Balze di Caspreno. 8-9- Apertural (a) and lateral (b) views of two incomplete shells consisting of last whorl (MZUF GC/16359a-b). Scale bar: 1 mm. G. Manganelli et alii - Aciculids from Tuscan Zanclean Pl. ix 2 x Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 53 (2), 2014 Gittenberger & Subai, 1989, P. polita polita (Hartmann, 1840), P. polita regina (Subai, 1977) and P. subfusca (Flach, 1889). The Caspreno Platyla is related to the latter group, within which species distinction is not easy. P. gracilis seems to best match the Capreno specimens, due to its truly cylindrical shape. P. gracilis has a southern European distribution limited to the central eastern sector: it is widespread in southern Germany, Austria, Italy, Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Albania and Greece (Boeters et al., 1989; Bodon & Cianfanelli, 2008; Bank, 2011). Statistical multivariate analysis was used to test for significant differences in shell biometric variables between living and fossil P. gracilis and between living and fossil P. similis (for the list of living populations examined, see Appendix). RDA results showed that RDA 2 (1%, P>0.05) tended to separate living from fossil populations but the axes were not significant. This means that there were no statistically significant differences between recent and fossil populations of the two entities (Fig. 4). Conversely, RDA 1 (80%, P<0.01) axes showed a statistically significant separation between the entire set of P. gracilis populations and those of P. similis. The preliminary PCA revealed that size was the first determinant of shell morphological variance (PC1 92%) since PC1 was a positive combination of all variables: indeed, P. similis is smaller than P. gracilis. This is the first report of P. gracilis as a fossil. Platyla similis (Reinhardt, 1880) (P1. 2, figs 1-3) Material examined - Eighty-one specimens from site 2 (70 specimens: 11 whole adult shells, nine juvenile shells, 50 fragmented shells consisting of 47 last whorls, three apertural fragments and four apices, GMC 41851; three specimens: three whole adult shells, MZUF GC/39611; three specimens: one whole adult shell, two fragmented shells consisting of two last whorls, 1 fragmented shell consisting of the first whorls, MZUF GC/20124; two specimens: two whole adult shells, MZUF GC/20125; three specimens: three whole adult shells, SCC 20125/17226). Four specimens from site 4 (three whole adult shells and one fragmented shell consisting of the last whorl, GMC 41852). Remarks - The smallest Caspreno Platyla, represented by many specimens, including 14 whole adult shells, is a small-sized species characterized by a cylindrical or cylindrical to slightly conical shell and a weak external peristomal varix (Pl. 2, figs 2-3; Tab. 1). It is very similar to P. similis, the smallest Platyla species having an external peristomal varix without clear proximal delimitation. This species has a southern European distribution limited to the central eastern sector: it is widespread in Italy, Croatia, Serbia, Albania, Greece, Romania and Bulgaria (Boeters et al., 1989; Bodon & Cianfanelli, 2008; Bank, 2011). Pleistocene fossils are reported from Great Britain and Germany (Boeters et al., 1989). Statistical multivariate analysis (RDA 2; 1%, P>0.05) showed that no significant difference in shell biometric variables separated living and fossil P. similis (Fig. 4) (for the list of living populations of P. similis examined, see Appendix). This is the first report of P. similis from the early Pliocene. However, re-examination of the specimen reported as P. cf. dupuyi by Ambrosetti et al. (1995) from the Pliocene of Fossil Forest of Dunarobba revealed that it belongs to P. similis. Genus Renea Nevill, 1880 Type species - Renea bourguignatiana Nevill, 1880 Renea cf. veneta (Pirona, 1865) (P1. 1, figs 5-9) Material examined - Fourty-four specimens from site 2 (34 specimens: 34 fragmented shells consisting of 34 last whorls and 11 apices, GMC 41853; three specimens: three fragmented shells consisting of two last whorls and one shell lacking last whorl, MZUF GC/39609; six specimens: six fragmented shells consisting of four last whorls and two apices, MZUF GC/16361; one specimen: fragmented shell consisting of last whorl, SCC 39609/17226). Remarks - The Caspreno material belongs to a medium-sized Renea species having a conical shell with regular spaced ribbing, a subsquare aperture with evident angular denticle, a thickened interrupted peristome slightly flared at base with a straight (orthocline) or slightly curved forward outer lip (prosocyrt), bordered by an evident external peristomal varix and no sinulus. The Caspreno species is easily distinguished from Oligocene R. microceras (Braun, 1851) and Miocene R. pretiosa (Andreae, 1904) by virtue of its much larger size, and from Recent R. spectabilis (Rossmässler, 1839) by virtue of its smaller size. It is also distinct, by virtue of apertural features, from Miocene R. leobersdorfensis (Wenz, 1921), which has a very marked external peristomal varix, from Pliocene R. saccoi Ciangherotti & Esu, 2005, which has a very marked external peristomal varix and an oblique aperture, from late Pleistocene and Recent R. bourguignatiana Nevill, 1880, and from Recent R. moutonii (Dupuy, 1849), R. paillona Boeters, Gittenberger & Subai, 1989, and R. singularis (Pollonera, 1905), which have a notch-like sinulus that causes variable detachment of the final portion of the last whorl from the suture. Finally, it is distinct from Recent R. elegantissima (Pini, 1886) and R. gentilei (Pollonera, 1889) by virtue of its conical spire and sparser axial ribbing and from Recent R. kobelti (Wagner, 1910) by virtue of its conical spire and evident external peristomal varix. The remaining Renea species, Recent R. berica Niero, Nardi & Braccia, 2012, R. gormonti Boeters, Gittenberger & Subai, 1989 and R. veneta (Pirona, 1865), are characterized by evident spiral microscultpure between axial ribs (absent or very faint in the other Renea species; Boeters et al., 1989; Niero et al., 2012); this delicate microsculpture is also present in Caspreno specimens although visible only in small areas, probably obscured by recrystallization during fossilization. Among these Renea species, the one that best matches Caspreno specimens is R. veneta due to its conical shell and dense ribbing (R. G. Manganelli et alii - Aciculids from Tuscan Zanclean xi Fig. 4 - Redundancy analysis (RDA) performed on living and fossil P. gracilis and P. similis. RDA 1 was significant for P<0.01 and explained 80% of the variation while RDA 2 was not statistically significant (P>0.05) and explained 1% of the variation. berica has sparse ribbing and R. gormonti a cylindric shell). They are therefore tentatively assigned to this entity, although there are minor differences in the aperture (peristome slightly flared at base and outer lip straight in apertural view in Caspreno specimens; peristome not flared at base and outer lip curved in apertural view in R. veneta). Unfortunately, the fragmentary state of the fossil specimens did not allow us to test the taxonomic setting by analysing statistically relationships between Caspreno Renea and living R. berica, R. gormonti and R. veneta (for the list of living populations examined, see Appendix). Indeed, RDA analysis was only performed on variables that it was possibile to measure on fossil specimens (five out of ten: LWH, AH, SD, AD, LWD) (Fig. 5). The first two axes of RDA accounted for 26% and 2% of variation, respectively. RDA 1 was significant for P<0.01. Caspreno fossil specimens were separate from all the others. Living R. veneta specimens were widely dispersed, with those of R. gormonti at one extreme and those of R. berica widely overlapping. These results do not support identification of the fossil specimens as R. veneta, but this may be due Fig. 5 - Redundancy analysis (RDA) performed on fossil Renea from Balze di Caspreno (R. cf. veneta) and living Renea species (R. berica, R. gormonti and R. veneta). RDA 1 was significant for P<0.01 and explained 26% of the variation while RDA 2 was not statistically significant (P>0.05) and explained 2% of the variation. xii Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 53 (2), 2014 to the fact that important shell variables such as PWD and AWD were omitted (the Renea species examined were distinguished by shell shape and these two variables contribute to describing this feature). This is the first report of R. veneta as a fossil. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Maurizio Ulivi (Centro Servizio Microscopia Elettronica e Microanalisi, Università di Firenze, Italy) gave technical assistance during SEM work. Helen Ampt revised the English. Mikaela Bernardoni and Florence Conti (Biblioteca di Area ScientificaTecnologica, Università di Siena, Italy) helped with bibliographic research. Bram van der Bijl loaned material from the Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum (Leiden, The Netherlands); Marco Bodon (Genova, Italy) and Gianbattista Nardi (Brescia, Italy) loaned material from their private collections. Daniela Esu (Università di Roma, Italy) and Piero Giuntelli (Università di Torino, Italy) provided information on Italian fossil aciculids and Ivan Martini (Università di Siena, Italy) on stratigraphical setting of the outcrop. Edmund Gittenberger (Leiden, The Netherlands) gave permission to reproduce figure 210 from the monograph on the aciculids by Boeters et al. (1989). Folco Giusti (Siena, Italy) offered discussion and criticism. REFERENCES Ambrosetti P., Basilici G., Ciangherotti A.D., Codipietro G., Corona E., Esu D., Girotti O., Lo Monaco A., Meneghini M., Paganelli A. & Romagnoli M. (1995). La foresta fossile di Dunarobba (Terni, Umbria, Italia Centrale): contesto litostratigrafico, sedimentologico, palinologico, dendrocronologico e paleomalacologico. Il Quaternario, 8: 465-508. Andreae A. (1883). Ein Beitrag zur Molluskenfauna der SüdAlpen. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft, 15: 129-143. Andreae A. (1904). Dritter Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Miocäns von Oppeln in Schlesien. Mitteilungen aus dem Roemer-Museum, 20: 1-22. Bank R.A. (2011). Fauna Europaea: Mollusca Gastropoda. Fauna Europaea version 2.4, http://www.faunaeur.org. Bertrand A. (2004). Les Aciculidae des Pyrénées françaises (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Documents Malacologiques, 4: 41-46. Bivona A. (1839). Nuovi molluschi terrestri e fluviatili dei dintorni di Palermo. Giornale di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti per la Sicilia, 64 (198): 221-233. Bodon M. (1994). Una nuova Acicula Hartmann della Liguria (Prosobranchia: Aciculidae). Bollettino Malacologico, 29: 211-222. Bodon M. & Boato A. (1987). A living fossil from Western Liguria: Renea (Renea) bourguignatiana Nevill 1880 (Prosobranchia: Aciculidae). Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 117: 151-157. Bodon M. & Cianfanelli S. (2008). Una nuova specie di Platyla per il sud Italia (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia: Aciculidae). Bollettino Malacologico, 44: 27-37. Bodon M., Favilli L., Giannuzzi Savelli R., Giovine F., Giusti F., Manganelli G., Melone G., Oliviero M., Sabelli B. & Spada G. (1995). Gastropoda Prosobranchia, Heterobranchia Heterostropha. In Minelli A., Ruffo S. & La Posta S. (eds), Checklist delle specie della fauna d’Italia, 14. 60 pp. Calderini, Bologna. Boeters H.D., Gittenberger E. & Subai P. (1985). Eine neute Gattung der Aciculidae (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) mit zwei neuen Arten. Basteria, 49: 59-64. Boeters H.D., Gittenberger E. & Subai P. (1989). Die Aciculidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda Prosobranchia). Zoologische Verhandelingen (Leiden), 252: 1-234. Boettger O. (1870). Revision der tertiären Land- und SüßwasserVersteinerungen des nördlichen Böhmens. Jahrbuch der kaiserlichköniglichen geologischen Reichsanstalt Wien, 20: 283-302. Boettger O. (1879). Kaukasische Mollusken, gesammelt von Hans Leder in Paskau. Jahrbücher der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft, 6: 1-42. Boettger O. (1883). Aufzählung der von den Herren E. Reitter und E. Brenske 1882 in Griechenland und auf den Jonischen Inseln gesammelten Binnenmollusken. Jahrbücher der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft, 10: 313-344. Bourguignat J.R. (1864). Malacologie de l’Algérie ou histoire naturelle des animaux mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles recueillis jusqu’a ce jour dans nos possessions du nord de l’Afrique. Tome second. 380 pp. Challamel Ainé, Paris; Bastide, Alger. Braun A. (1851). Darstellung der geognostischen Verhältnisse des Mainzer Beckens und seiner fossilen Fauna und Flora. In Walchner F.A. (ed.), Handbuch der Geognosie zum Gebrauche bei seinen Vorlesungen und zum Selbststudium mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der geognostischen Verhältnisse der Grossherzogthums Baden, 2 Auflage, Lieferung 8: 1121-1169. Cianfanelli S., Talenti E., Bodon M. & Manganelli G. (2000). Two Platyla species from Sardinia (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia: Aciculidae). Journal of Conchology, 37: 61-74. Ciangherotti A. & Esu D. (2005). A new Pliocene species of the genus Renea G. Nevill, 1880 (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia: Aciculidae). Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 134: 121-127. Ciangherotti A., Esu D., Martinetto E. & Giuntelli P. (2007). The remarkable Middle Pliocene non-marine mollusc record from Ceresole d’Alba, Piedmont, north-west Italy: biochronology, palaeobiogeography and palaeoecology supported by fossil plants. Geobios, 40: 573-587. Clessin S. (1877). Eine neue Acme. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft, 9: 42-43. Clessin S. (1911). Neue Acme-Arten. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft, 43: 165-167. Cox L.R. (1960). In Knight J.B., Batten R.L., Yochelson E.L. & Cox L.R., Supplement. Paleozoic and some Mesozoic Caenogastropoda and Opisthobranchia. In Moore R.C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part I Mollusca 1. Geological Society of America, Inc. and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence: I310- I324. Creek G.A. (1954). The morphology of Acme fusca (Montagu) with special reference to the genital system. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 29: 228-240. De Stefani C. (1876-80). Molluschi continentali fino ad ora notati in Italia nei terreni pliocenici, ed ordinamento di questi ultimi. Atti della Società Toscana di Scienze Naturali Residente in Pisa, 2: 130-174 (1876), 3: 274-325 (1877), 5: 9-108 (1880). Draparnaud J.P.R. (1801). Tableau des mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles de la France. [2] + 116 pp. Renaud, Montpellier; Bossange, Masson & Besson, Paris. Dupuy D. (1849). Catalogus extramarinorum Galliae testaceorum. 4 pp. Publisher and place not reported but probably Masson, Paris. Flach K. (1889). Ueber die tertiären Arten des Genus Acme Hartmann. Bericht der Wetterauischen Gesellschaft für die gesamte Naturkunde zu Hanau, 1. April 1887 bis 31. März 1889: 69-77. Foresi L.M., Mazzei R. & Salvatorini G. (2001). Schema di biostratigrafia integrata a plancton calcareo per il NeogeneQuaternario. In Bossio A., Mazzei R., Monteforti B. & Salvatorini G. (eds), Note illustrative alla Carta Geologica di S. Maria di Leuca. Atti della Società Toscana di Scienze Naturali, Memorie Serie A, 107: 145-158. Gray J.E. (1847). A list of the genera of recent Mollusca, their synonyma and types. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 15: 129-219. Gray J.E. (1850). Figures of molluscous animals, selected from various authors. Etched for the use of students by M.E. Gray. Volume IV. iv + 219 pp. Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans, London. Haller B. (1892). Die Morphologie der Prosobranchier. Morphologisches Jarbuch, 18: 451-543. G. Manganelli et alii - Aciculids from Tuscan Zanclean Hartmann J.D.W. (1840). Erd- und Süsswasser-Gasteropoden der Schweiz. Mit Zugabe einiger erkwürdigen exotischen Arten. I. Band. [1 part] i-xx, 1-36. Scheitlin & Zollikofer, St. Gallen. Hartmann W. (1821). System der Erd und Flußschnecken der Schweiz. Mit vergleichender Aufzaehlung aller auch in den benachbarten Laendern, Deutschland, Frankreich und Italien sich vorfindenden Arten. Neue Alpina, 1: 194-268. Jackiewicz M. (1967). Badania anatomiczne i histologiczne nad Acicula polita (Hartm.) z uwzględnieniem innych gatunkóv Acicula Hartm. (Molusca, Prosobranchia). Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk Wydział MatematycznoPrzyrodniczy Prace Komisji Biologicznej, 32: 1-76. Jackiewicz M. (1979). Materials to Aciculidae fauna of Balcan peninsula (Mollusca, Prosobranchia). Bulletin de la Société des Amis des Sciences et des Lettres de Poznan, Série D, 18: 135-138. Kadolsky D. (2008). Mollusks from the Late Oligocene of Oberleichtersbach (Rhön Mountains, Germany). Part 2: Gastropoda: Neritimorpha and Caenogastropoda. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 260: 103-137. Manganelli G., Aldinucci M., Capezzuoli E. & Benocci A. (2008). Strobilopsid land snails (Gastropoda: Pulmonata, Strobilopsidae) from the late Messinian - Early Pliocene (?) of Balze di Caspreno (central Italy). Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 46: 101-106. Manganelli G., Benocci A. & Martini I. (2011). A new Janulus species (Gastropoda Pulmonata Gastrodontidae) from the Zanclean (early Pliocene) of Tuscany (central Italy). Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 49: 165-173. Manganelli G. & Giusti F. (1997). A new cochlostomatid prosobranch from the early Pliocene of Balze di Caspreno near Siena, central Italy. Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 35: 199-211. Manganelli G. & Giusti F. (2000). Drepanostoma helenae, a new helicodontine land snail from the Lower Pliocene of Balze di Caspreno near Siena (central Italy) and a discussion on the status of Protodrepanostoma Germain, 1929 (Gastropoda Pulmonata: Hygromiidae). Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 39: 351-358. Martini I., Aldinucci M., Foresi L.M., Mazzei R. & Sandrelli F. (2011). Geological map of the Pliocene succession of the Northern Siena Basin (Tuscany, Italy). Journal of Maps, 7: 193-205. Montagu G. (1803). Testacea Britannica, or natural history of British shells, marine, land, and fresh-water. xxxvii, 606, 4 pp. White, London. Moquin-Tandon A. (1856). Histoire naturelle des Mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles de France. Volume 2 (Livr. 6): 369-646. Ballière, Paris. Nevill G. (1879). Description of a new species of Acme and varieties from the conglomerate beds at Menton. Annals and Magazine of Natural History Series V, 4: 341-342. Nevill G. (1880). On the land-shells, extinct and living, of the neighbourhood of Menton (Alpes Maritimes); with description of a new genus and several new species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1880: 94-142. Niero I., Nardi G. & Braccia A. (2012). Una nuova specie di Renea Nevill, 1880 per le Prealpi Venete (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia: Aciculidae). Bollettino Malacologico, 48: 106-115. Oksanen J., Kindt R., Legendre P. & O’Hara R.B. (2006). Vegan. Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-3, URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/ Oppenheim P. (1895). Neue Binnenschnecken aus dem Vicentiner Eocän. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 47: 57-193. Paladilhe A. (1868). Nouvelles miscellanées malacologiques [VI.] Monographie du genre Acme. Revue et Magazin de Zoologie Pure et Appliquée Série II, 20: 225-239, 273-283, 321-330. Pini N. (1884). Novità malacologiche. Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali, 27: 230-256. xiii Pini N. (1886). Nuova forma di Acme italiana. Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali, 29: 521-522. Pintér L. & Szigethy A. (1973). Über zwei Acicula-Arten aus Jugoslawien (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 103: 97-98. Pirona A. (1865). Prospetto dei molluschi terrestri e fluviatili finora raccolti nel Friuli. Atti del Regio Istituto Veneto di Scienze Lettere ed Arti, Serie III, 10: 675-708. Pollonera C. (1889). Note malacologiche. V. Acme Italiane del gruppo delle costulatae. Bullettino della Società Malacologica Italiana, 14: 50-54. Pollonera C. (1905). Note malacologiche. I. Intorno a due nuove specie di Acmeidae. Bollettino dei Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia comparata della Regia Università di Torino, 20: 1-3. R Development Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/. Reinhardt O. (1880). Über die Acme-Arten des Banats und Siebenbürgens. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, 1880: 45-47. Rossmässler E.A. (1839). Iconographie der Land- & SüßwasserMollusken, 2 (3-4) [Heft 9-10]: i-iv, 1-46. Arnold, Dresden und Leipzig. Rossmässler E.A. (1842). Iconographie der Land- & SüßwasserMollusken, 2 (5) [Heft 11]: i-iv, 1-15. Arnold, Dresden und Leipzig. Sacco F. (1887). Rivista della fauna malacologica fossile terrestre, lacustre e salmastra del Piemonte. Bullettino della Società Malacologica Italiana, 12: 135-203. Sandberger F. (1862). Die Conchylien des Mainzer Tertiärbeckens. Heft 7, 233-270, pls. 31-35. Kreidel, Wiesbaden. Schlickum W.R. (1970). Neue tertiäre Landschnecken. Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 100: 83-87. Schlickum W.R. (1975). Die oberpliozäne Molluskenfauna von Cessey-sur-Tille (Département Côte d’Or). Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 106: 47-79. Schlickum W.R. & Strauch F. (1979). Die Land- und Süßwassermollusken der pliozänen Deckschichten der rheinischen Braunkohle. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 536: 1-144. Stworzewicz E. & Soltys Z. (1996). Miocene land snails from Bełchatów (central Poland). II: Aciculidae (Gastropoda Prosobranchia). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 70: 67-77. Subai P. (1977). Über italienische Acicula-Arten (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 108: 37-43. Subai P. (2009). New land snails from Montenegro and Albania (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 138: 103-112. ter Braak C.J.F. (1986). Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67: 1167-1179. Torres Alba J.S. (2012). Descripción de Platyla hedionda sp. nov. y nueva cita de Acicula norrisi Gittenberger et Boeters, 1977 (Gastropoda: Aciculidae) en la península. Spira, 4: 101-104. Wagner A.J. (1910). Neue Arten des Genus Acme Hartmann aus Süd-Dalmatien. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 32: 187-188. Wagner A.J. (1912). Beschreibungen neuer Land- und Süsswasserschnecken aus Südösterreich, Kroatien und Bosnien. Verhandlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen ZoologischBotanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 62: 246-260. Wenz W. (1921). Zur Fauna der pontischen Schichten von Leobersdorf. Senckenbergiana, 3: 75-86. Manuscript received 25 March 2014 Revised manuscript accepted 2 August 2014 Zoobank registration number urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6D82E278F6DA-471D-9109-7DBE5E159AE0 Zoobank registration date 24 September 2014 Published online 30 September 2014 Editor Annalisa Ferretti xiv Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 53 (2), 2014 Appendix Material of Recent taxa considered for statistical analysis or used for comparison. Acicula fusca (Montagu, 1803) 1) Belgium, Namur, Parc National de Furtooz; A.J. de Winter leg. 25.6.1983 (RMNH.MOL. 161956). 2) France, Pyrénées Atlantiques, Itxassou; H.J. Hoenselaar & J. Hoenselaar leg. 26.9.2000 (ZMA.MOLL. 2282567). 3) Germany, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Neandertal; H. Schütt & P. Subai leg. 22.6.1975 (RMNH.MOL.161965). 4) Spain, Guipuzcoa/Navarro, 13 km SE Beasain, Alto de Lizarrusti; A.J. de Winter leg. 8.4.1985 (RMNH.MOL. 161962). 5) Spain, Santander, entrance Cueva de Tijeras, SE of Haces near Comillas; A.J. de Winter leg. 17.4.1984 (RMNH.MOL. 161961). Acicula lineata lineata (Draparnaud, 1801) 1) France, Ain, Serrière sur Ain - Bolozon; H.J. Hoenselaar & J. Hoenselaar leg. 14.9.1999 (ZMA.MOLL. 2284450). 2) France, Jura, S of Lac de Chalain; E. Subai & P. Subai leg. 18.7.1977 (ZMA.MOLL. 321439). 3) Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Isteiner Kloz; A.C. Gittenberger & E. Gittenberger leg. 20.5.1971 (RMNH. MOL. 162081). 4) Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Wutachschlucht; A.J. de Winter leg. 30.6.1982 (RMNH. MOL. 162072). 5) Switzerland, Bern, Spiezberg; A.J. de Winter leg. 17.5.1980 (RMNH.MOL. 162088). Acicula lineata sublineata (Andreae, 1883) 1) Italy, Lombardia, San Pellegrino Terme (Bergamo); P. Subai leg. 22.7.1976 (RMNH.MOL. 162096). 2) Italy, Lombardia, 5 km S of Serina (Bergamo); E. Gittenberger leg. 6.9.1974 (RMNH.MOL. 162099). 3) Switzerland, Tessin, Lugano, Monte San Salvatore; H.D. Boeters leg. (RMNH.MOL. 162097). 4) Switzerland, Tessin, Tremona; E. Gittenberger leg. 26.5.1989 (RMNH.MOL. 45456). 5) Switzerland, Tessin, S of Meride S of Lugano; B. Hauser leg. 13.7.1977 (RMNH.MOL. 45459) Acicula szigethyannae Subai, 1977 1) Italy, Apulia: Foresta Umbra (Monte Sant’Angelo, Foggia), M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 04/01/1996 (SCC 6556/1142). 2) Italy, Sicily: debris of Fiume Anapo (Cassaro, Siracusa), S. Cianfanelli & E. Talenti leg. 24/05/2008 (MZUF GC/26742). 3) Italy, Campania: Boschetiello Mountain (Calabritto, Avellino), S. Cianfanelli & E. Talenti leg. 30/04/1995 (MZUF GC/10874). 4) Italy, Campania: near Grotta dell’Angelo (Olevano sul Tusciano, Salerno), S. Cianfanelli & E. Talenti leg. 16/10/1994 (MZUF GC/10798). 5) Tuscany (Pietrasanta, Lucca): Porta, debris of Fiume Versilia, M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 25/04/2010 (SSC/28380/6314). Platyla gracilis (Clessin, 1877) 1) Italy, Marche: Favalanciata, debris of Fiume Tronto (Acquasanta Terme, Ascoli Piceno), M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 3.6.1995 (SCC 24703/1122). 2) Italy, Tuscany: debris of Fiume Sieve (Vicchio, Firenze), M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 4.2.2007 (SCC 23934/5246). 3) Italy, Tuscany: Colognole, debris of Torrente Uscioli (Pontassieve, Firenze), A. Arrighi, M. Calcagno, S. Cianfanelli & C. Volpi leg. 11.4.1999 (SCC 8967/2019). 4) Italy, Tuscany: Porto Santo Stefano, near Sorgente Appetito (Monte Argentario, Grosseto), M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 22.9.2012 (SCC 42112/18456). 5) Italy, Tuscany: Porta, debris of Fiume Versilia (Pietrasanta, Lucca), M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 25.4.2010 (SCC 28378/6314). Platyla similis (Reinhardt, 1880) 1) Italy, Tuscany: Porta, debris of Fiume Versilia (Pietrasanta, Lucca), M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 25.4.2010 (SCC 28379/6314). 2) Italy, Tuscany: Risolaia near Grezzano, debris of Torrente Rampolli (Borgo San Lorenzo, Firenze), M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 15.9.1998 (SCC 10410/1873). 3) Italy, Tuscany: Isola, debris of Fiume Magra (Aulla, Massa Carrara), S. Cianfanelli leg. 6.4.1997 (SCC 14533/1565). 4) Italy, Tuscany: Colognole, debris of Torrente Uscioli (Pontassieve, Firenze), A. Arrighi, M. Calcagno, S. Cianfanelli & C. Volpi leg. 11.4.1999 (SCC 8965/2019). 5) Italy, Tuscany: debris of Fiume Sieve (Vicchio, Firenze); M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 4.2.2007 (SCC 23932/5246). Renea berica Niero, Nardi & Braccia, 2012 1) Italy, Veneto: Monti Berici, northern slope of Monte Cengia (Barbarano Vicentino,Vicenza), A. Braccia, P. Greotti & G. Nardi leg. 19.6.2011 (FGC 40682, MZUF GC/41614, SCC 41614/13309). Renea gormonti Boeters, Gittenberger & Subai, 1989 1) France, Maritime Alps, Mentone, N of Monti, M. Bodon leg. 3.1.1999 (MBC, FGC 41854, SCC 40481/17688). Renea veneta (Pirona, 1865) Italy, Liguria: banks of Rio Pennavaira near Ponte Carpe (Castelbianco, Savona), M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 24.6.1990 (SCC 1056/3). 2) Italy, Friuli Venezia Giulia: Campone, debris of Torrente Chiarzo (Tramonti di Sotto, Pordenone), S. Cianfanelli leg. 2.4.1999 (SCC 8875/2014). 3) Italy, Friuli Venezia Giulia: debris of Fiume Natisone, Paderno (Premariacco, Udine), M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 28.12.1990 (SCC 1358/10). 4) Italy, Friuli Venezia Giulia: Azzida, debris of Torrente Alberone, 500 m upstream from confluence with Torrente Cosizza (San Pietro al Natisone, Udine); M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 28.12.1990 (SCC 1558/11). 5) Italy, Friuli Venezia Giulia: Invillino, Cascata della Plera (Villa Santina, Udine), M. Calcagno & S. Cianfanelli leg. 25.3.1989 (SCC 22974/470).
© Copyright 2025 ExpyDoc