http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2008/080527NIE.ppt 最大持続生態系サービスと 順応的生態系管理 松田裕之(横浜国大) H Matsuda & PA Abrams(トロント大) Ecol. Appl. 2006 16:225-237 牧野光琢(水産総研セ)・小谷浩示(国際大) 5th World Fisheries Congress 1 http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2008/080527NIE.ppt 今日の話 1. 最大持続漁獲量(MSY)理論批判 2. 順応的生態系管理の限界 3. 最大持続生態系サービスの提案 2008/3/2 2 Requiem to Maximum Sustainable Yield Theory surplus production • Ecosystems are uncertain, non-equilibrium and complex. • MSY theory ignores all the three. • Myth #2 MSY theory guarantees species persistence… 12/6/06 3 Stock abundance Catch in Japan (1000 mt) Species Replacement of Pelagic Fishes Anchovy Horse mackerels Pacific saury Chub mackerel Sardine 改定管理方式は順応的管理の先取り だった。RMP is an AM MSY 2 Production limit stock level managed resource 1 Unused resource Catch quota Fishing rate Protected resource 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Relative Stock Size P t /P 0 0.8 1 MSY at 60%, 0 catch at 54% Unconstrained MSY that maximizes the total yield from the community (Matsuda & Abrams 2006) • • • • • • We choose fishing effort ei independently; 6-species systems including 2 prey random matrix with 50% probabilities; we seek r having a positive equilibrium; price p is 0-1 for prey, 0-10 for predators Unconstrained MSY that may result in extinction; 12/6/06 6 5 4 3 1 2 6 Some resultant biological communities at MSY (Matsuda & Abrams 2006) Solution maximizing total yield from community MSY solution often reduces species and links; 5 5 4 1 5 4 5 6 4 4 3 2 6 5 4 3 (e) 6 6 6 (d) (c) (b) (a) 3 3 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 2 http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2008/080527NIE.ppt 今日の話 1. 最大持続漁獲量(MSY)理論批判 2. 順応的生態系管理の限界 3. 最大持続生態系サービスの提案 2008/3/2 8 Feedback control in fishing effort is powerful... Stock size Fishing effort dE U N N * dt dN f ( N ) qEN dt 12/6/06 N* N*N* f(N) Myth #4 • Even though the MSY level is unknown, the feedback control stabilizes a broad range of target stock level . Stock size N 9 Harvest of prey (Matsuda & Abrams 2008 4th WFC Proceedings) dN r(1 N ) N fN P qEN dt K 1 hN dP d P bfN P 1 hN dt In the case of feedback control, dE U (N S ) dt Catch of prey will decrease predator, rather than prey dP/dt=0 dN/dt=0 Fishing effort must be controlled by the predator density P • dE/dt = U(P – Target predator density) • E = E(N, P), E/N > 0, E/P > 0 e.g. E = Etarget (1 + a log NP/NtargetPtarget) • In this case, feedback control guarantees persistence of the target stock and its predators. • Adaptive multi-species management is sometimes needed (seek simplicity, but distrust it). 12/6/06 11 Feedback control with community interactions also result in undesired outcomes. (M & A unpublished) dNi ri a ji N j qei Ni dt j 9 10 8 r = (0.454,1.059,1.186,0.247,-0.006,-0.028,-0.059,-0.704,-0.308,-0.238) 7 A = (aji) = 1. 0.74 0.19 0.31 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.7 0.46 0.74 1. 0.87 0.08 0.46 0.66 0.48 0.73 0.84 0. 0.19 0.87 1. 0.96 0.08 0.14 0.83 0. 0. 0.68 0.31 0.08 0.96 1. 0. 0. 0. 0.28 0. 0.88 0. 0.46 0.08 0. 0.1 0. 0. 0.92 0.15 0.84 0. 0.66 0.14 0. 0. 0.1 0.01 0. 0.5 0.69 0. 0.48 0.83 0. 0. 0.01 0.1 0.56 0. 0. e9 = 0.1, ei = 0 0. 0.73 0. 0.28 0.92 0. 0.56 0.1 0.28 0. 0.7 0.84 0. 0. 0.15 0.5 0. 0.28 0.1 0. 0.46 0. 0.68 0.88 0.84 0.69 0. 0. 0. 0.1 5 6 1 4 2 3 Feedback control may result in extinction of other species (sp. 6). ratio de9/dt = u(N9-N9*) http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2008/080527NIE.ppt 今日の話 1. 最大持続漁獲量(MSY)理論批判 2. 順応的生態系管理の限界 3. 最大持続生態系サービスの提案 2008/3/2 14 地球環境変化Gobal change 人間の福利Human well-being 生態系サービスEcosystem services 供給サービス 生物多様性 Biodiversity 文化的サービス 支持サービス 生態系機能 Ecosystem functions 調整サービス (MA2005) 2008/3/2 15 なぜ自然を守るのか? 持続可能性 =次世代の人間が生態系 サービスを享受できるよ う、自然を守る (米生態学会委報告 1996) http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2008/080223.ppt 生態系サービスと人間の福利 (MA 2005より) 生態系サービス 矢印の色 社会経済的認知度 低い 中間 高い 供給サービス 安全保障 •食料 •淡水 •木材と繊維 •燃料 その他 •個人の安全 •資源利用の保障 •災害からの保障 調整サービス •気候調節 •洪水制御 •疾病制御 •水質浄化 その他 文化的サービス •審美的 •精神的 •教育的 •娯楽的 その他 矢印の太さ 繋がりの強さ 弱い 中間 強い 生存権の基盤 •適切な生活条件 •十分な栄養ある食料 •住居 •生活用品の提供 健康 •活力 •快適さ •きれいな空気と水の提供 よい社会関係 •社会の連帯感 •互恵 •扶助の能力 を一 選 達人 択 成一 と す人 るが 行 能や 動 力り の た自 い由 こ と 、 大 切 に し た い こ と • • 一支 次持 生サ 産ー 、ビ そス の 他栄 養 素 の 循 環 、 土 壌 形 成 、 人間の福利の構成要素 生態系サービスの価値 • • • • 生物資源 農林水産物 約140兆円/年 生態系service 物質循環 約1700兆円/年 資源価値<<生態系サービス 漁場の自然価値>漁業補償 2008/3/2 17 Risk of human lives by climate change 2008/3/2 Parry et al., (2001) IPCC報告書 18 Effect on ecosystems by climate chage Global mean temperature increase above pre-industrial 2008/3/2 Hare, W. L. (2003). Assessment of Knowledge on Impacts of Climate Change – Contribution to the Specification of Art. 2 of the UNFCCC. http://www.wbgu.de/wbgu_sn2003_ex01.pdf. 19 Ecosystem services V(N, C) • V(N, C) = Y(C) – cE + S(N) • • • • Provisional Service (Fisheries Yield) … Y(C) Fishing Cost… cE Utility of standing biomass… S(N) C… catch; E… fishing effort; N… stock biomass 2008/3/2 20 (Matsuda, Makino, Kotani, in press) Regulating services S(N)= SN2/(B2+N2) (S, B) = (100,10) (S, B) = (50,50) Stock abundance N 2008/3/2 21 (Matsuda, Makino, Kotani, in press) Mathematics • • • • • • • Stock dynamics … dN/dt = (r – aN)N – C, Catch and yield … C = qEN, Y(C) = pqEN, Regulating service … S(N) = SN2/(B2+N2), Equilibrium … N*(E) = (r – qE)/a Service at N* … V*(E) = pqEN* – cE + S(N*) Optimal effort Eopt satisfies that V*/E = 0 Maximum Sustainable Ecosystem Service Eopt = (pqr – ac)/2pq2 2008/3/2 22 (Matsuda, Makino, Kotani, in press) Maximum Sustainable Ecosystem Service (S, B) = (100,10) (S, B) = (50,50) (S, B) = (0,-) 2008/3/2 23 (Matsuda, Makino, Kotani, in press) Control rules Constant escapement ABC rule Constant catch MSY vs MSES with uncertainties (Y*,V*) = (77.6 ,165.7) fishing effort 2008/3/2 (Y*,V*) = (43.3, 216.4) stock abundance Catch 25 (Matsuda, Makino, Kotani, in press) MSES from food webs • Community dynamics … dNi/dt = (ri + ajiNj – qiEi)Ni • Yield from foodweb… Y(E) = Ei(piqiNi – ci) • Total ecosystem services...V(E) = Y(E) + Si(Ni) • Si(Ni) = SiNi2/(Bi2+Ni2) • We obtained EMSES ↑ Y(E) and EMSY ↑V(E) 2008/3/2 26 (Matsuda, Makino, Kotani, in press) 3 (a) 6 4 (b) 5 6 (c) 5 (d) 5 6 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 (e) 1 2 (f) 6 2008/3/2 6 30 4 1 1 15 5 1 2 (g) 6 5 1 2 6 5 (h) 6 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 27 (Matsuda, Makino, Kotani, in press) Resultant food webs and fishing efforts from 1000 randomly constructed six species systems. No. of species No. of extant species using MSY policy No. of exploited No of extant species using species using MSY policy MSES policy No of exploited species using MSES policy 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 204 0 96 2 206 792 13 318 3 531 4 43 337 4 236 0 31 201 5 25 0 8 35 6 2 0 905 4 (Matsuda, Makino, Kotani, in press) MSES saves fishing efforts 100% YMSES/YMSY 80% 60% 40% Ban-on-Fishing 20% 0% 0% 2008/3/2 20% 40% 60% YMSY/VMSES 80% 100% 29 (Matsuda, Makino, Kotani, in press) Conclusion • Responsible fisheries may play roles of umbrella species that use a small part of healthy ecosystem services, and give many data of utilized resources… • Fishing efforts that maximizes the total ecosystem services are usually much smaller than those for maximum sustainable yield. 2008/3/2 30 (Matsuda, Makino, Kotani, in press)
© Copyright 2025 ExpyDoc