#28-Tanahashi ASENT 13th Annual Meeting Mega Clinical Studies - Lessons from CSPS2 - Norio Tanahashi Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Japan #28-Tanahashi Background The efficacy of aspirin and other antiplatelets in secondary prevention of cerebral infarction has been demonstrated in various studies and metaanalyses, mostly conducted in the US and EU. A significant reduction in risk of recurrence of cerebral infarction for cilostazol compared with placebo was demonstrated in the Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study (CSPS) Cilostazol Stroke Prevention StudyⅡ (CSPSⅡ) is the first, long-term, large-scale, phase4 clinical trial in Japan. #28-Tanahashi #28-Tanahashi Treatment strategy for atherothrombotic cerebral infarction Cilostazol Improvement of endothelial Antiplatelet Vasodilation function Antiplatelet Improvement of Anti-atherosclerosis endothelial function Vasodilation Anti-atherosclerosis #28-Tanahashi Cilostazol is Superior to Aspirin for Secondary Stroke Prevention: Results of CSPSⅡ Multi-center, randomized, prospective, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group comparative study in Japan #28-Tanahashi Outline of study plan Objective:This study was designed to investigate whether cilostazol is superior to aspirin in secondary prevention of cerebral infarction in stroke patients in Japan. Number of participants:1300 in each group, for a total of 2600 Number of study institutions:294 Study period:5 years, (December 2003 to December 2008) #28-Tanahashi Study design Multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, comparative study 1300 Cilostazol 200mg R Duration of treatment: 1–5 years Study period:December 2003-December 2008 Aspirin 81mg 1300 Primary endpoint:Occurrence of stroke (cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage) #28-Tanahashi Main inclusion and exclusion criteria Main inclusion criteria Patients in stable condition within 182 days (26 weeks) of occurrence of cerebral infarction Patients with infarct-related foci detected by x-ray CT scan or MRI Patients aged 20-80 years (inclusive) at time of consent Patients having no cardiac diseases possibly associated with cardiogenic cerebral embolism Main exclusion criteria Patients with hemorrhage or bleeding tendency Patients with ischemic heart failure Patients with peptic ulcer Patients with severe blood disorders Patients with severe hepatic or renal disorders Patients with malignant neoplasm or who have received any therapy for malignant neoplasm within 5 years prior to study enrollment #28-Tanahashi Criteria for Evaluation Primary endpoint Occurrence of stroke (cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage) during the treatment period Secondary endpoints Recurrence of cerebral infarction during the treatment period Occurrence of ischemic cerebrovascular diseases (cerebral infarction or TIA) during the treatment period Occurrence of all-cause death during the treatment period Occurrence of cerebral stroke, TIA, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, cardiac failure, or hemorrhage requiring hospitalization during the treatment period #28-Tanahashi Patients characteristics1 Cilostazol (n=1337) 959 (71.7) Aspirin (n=1335) 957 (71.7) Age* (Yr) 63.5±9.2 63.4±9.0 0.76 BMI* (kg/m2) 24.0±3.1 23.9±3.1 0.54 Male sex - n (%) Stroke subtypes - n (%) Atherothrombotic Lacunar Undetermined Days after onset - n (%) - 28 days 29-56 days 57-112 days 113 -< days P value 0.98 0.57 435 (32.5) 869 (65.0) 33 (2.5) 420 (31.5) 874 (65.5) 41 (3.1) 0.35 414 354 343 226 (31.0) (26.5) (25.7) (16.9) 419 338 320 258 (31.4) (25.3) (24.0) (19.3) * Mean±SD #28-Tanahashi Patients characteristics 2 Cilostazol (n=1337) Aspirin (n=1335) Severity at baseline (Classification by Modified Rankin Scale) n (%) Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade 0 1 2 3 4 5 207 612 406 73 39 0 (15.5) (45.8) (30.4) (5.5) (2.9) (0.0) P value 0.55 186 613 432 69 35 0 (13.9) (45.9) (32.4) (5.2) (2.6) (0.0) Smoking - n (%) 385 (28.8) 403 (30.2) 0.43 Alcohol intake - n (%) 640 (47.9) 624 (46.7) 0.56 991 18 393 599 0.10 0.47 0.19 0.62 0.12 Complications - n (%) Hypertension Ischemic heart disease Diabetes mellitus Dyslipidemia 976 11 382 560 (73.0) (0.8) (28.6) (41.9) (74.2) (1.3) (29.4) (44.9) * Mean±SD #28-Tanahashi Concomitant medications Cilostazol (n=1337) Antihypertensive agents ARB Ca antagonists ACE inhibitors 900 617 627 111 (67.3) (46.1) (46.9) (8.3) Aspirin (n=1335) 999 723 753 121 (74.8) (54.2) (56.4) (9.1) Lipid-lowering agents Statins 401 (30.0) 362 (27.1) 452 (33.9) 402 (30.1) Antidiabetic agents 271 (20.3) 278 (20.8) Digestive agents 863 (64.5) 908 (68.0) n (%) #28-Tanahashi Primary and secondary endpoint Cilostazol (n=1337) Aspirin (n=1335) No of patients (%) 【Efficacy end point】 Cilostazol better 0 0.5 Primary endpoint Stroke (Cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage) Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 82 (2.76) 119 (3.71) Cerebral infarction 72 (2.43) 88 (2.75) Ischemic cerebrovascular disorder (Cerebral infarction, TIA) 86 (2.90) 103 (3.21) Death from any cause 13 (0.42) 13 (0.39) Composite secondary end point* 138 (4.66) 186 (5.81) 1 Hazard ratio Log-rank test P value 0.74 (0.56-0.98) 0.04 Aspirin better 1.5 2.0 2.5 Secondary end point 0.88 (0.65-1.20) 0.90 (0.68-1.19) 1.07 (0.50-2.31) 0.80 (0.64-0.99) 0.42 0.46 0.86 0.04 【Safety end point】 Bleeding events (cerebral 0.46 hemorrhage, 23 (0.77) 57 (1.78) <0.001 subarachnoid hemorrhage, bleeding (0.30-0.71) requiring hospitalization) * Cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, TIA, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, cardiac failure or hemorrhage requiring hospitalization, death #28-Tanahashi Primary end point:Occurrence of stroke (cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage) (%) Cumulative incidence 15 n Estimate No of occurrence Incidence /year Cilostazol 1337 82 2.76% Aspirin 1335 119 3.71% Aspirin 10 Cilostazol 5 P=0.0357 Log-rank test RRR=25.7% 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 Days after randomization No. at Risk Cilostazol 1337 1137 1063 1031 989 941 896 864 788 686 570 450 331 227 135 68 29 8 Aspirin 1335 1227 1148 1089 1046 1005 967 926 837 750 628 509 377 255 152 75 33 7 #28-Tanahashi Occurrence of cerebral stroke, TIA, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, cardiac failure, or hemorrhage requiring hospitalization (%) 25 Cumulative incidence Estimate No of occurrences Incidence /year n Cilostazol 1337 138 4.66% Aspirin 1335 186 5.81% 20 Aspirin 15 Cilostazol 10 P=0.0437 Log-rank test RRR=20.1% 5 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 Days after randomization No. at Risk Cilostazol 1337 1136 1062 1031 987 941 896 863 787 686 569 449 331 227 135 68 29 8 Aspirin 1335 1226 1145 1087 1045 1005 966 923 836 750 628 508 376 255 152 75 33 7 #28-Tanahashi Occurrence of bleeding events (cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, bleeding requiring hospitalization) (%) Cumulative incidence 10 Estimate No of occurrences Incidence /year n Cilostazol 1337 23 0.77% Aspirin 1335 57 1.78% P=0.0004 Log-rank 検定 RRR=54.2% Aspirin 5 0 Cilostazol 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 Days after randomization No. at Risk Cilostazol 1337 1137 1063 1032 990 942 896 864 788 686 570 451 331 227 135 68 29 8 Aspirin 1335 1227 1149 1090 1047 1006 967 927 836 751 628 509 377 255 152 75 33 7 #28-Tanahashi Summary of adverse events Cilostazol (n=1337) Aspirin (n=1335) P value* 313 (23.4) 217 (16.3) <0.001 Diarrhea 164 (12.3) 85 (6.4) <0.001 Palpitations 156 (11.7) 71 (5.3) <0.001 Dizziness 129 (9.6) 97 (7.3) 0.03 Tachycardia 89 (6.7) 21 (1.6) <0.001 Hypertension 120 (9.0) 185 (13.9) <0.001 Constipation 110 (8.2) 155 (11.6) 0.003 n (%) Headache *:Fisherの正確検定 #28-Tanahashi Results • Cilostazol significantly reduced occurrence of stroke (cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage) compared with aspirin. (P=0.0357,RRR=25.7% )。 • Cilostazol significantly reduced occurrence of cerebral stroke, TIA, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, cardiac failure, or hemorrhage requiring hospitalization compared with aspirin. (P=0.0437、RRR=20.1% ) • Cilostazol significantly reduced occurrence of bleeding events (cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, bleeding requiring hospitalization)(P=0.0004、 RRR=54.2%) #28-Tanahashi Conclusions • Cilostazol demonstrated efficacy in preventing recurrent stroke in patients with cerebral infarction, with less bleeding compared to aspirin for the first time. • Cilostazol is a suitable first option for the prevention of recurrent stroke. Occurrence of Stroke #28-Tanahashi -CSPS2 Sub analysis(%/person・year) 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 4.07 RRR 32% 3.03 2.5 2.0 RRR 25% Cilostazol Aspirin 3.06 2.08 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 (n=435) (n=420) Atherothrombotic (n=869) (n=874) Lacunar #28-Tanahashi Occurrence of Cerebral Infarction -CSPS2 Sub analysis(%/person・year) 3.5 3.0 2.5 Cilostazol Aspirin RRR 28% 2.88 2.69 2.45 2.0 1.5 RRR 7% 1.77 1.0 0.5 0 (n=435) (n=420) Atherothrombotic (n=869) (n=874) Lacunar #28-Tanahashi Incidence of Hemorrhagic Stroke among Ischemic Stroke Subtypes CSPS2 sub-analysis (%/person・year) 1.4 1.2 p=0.0030 Cilostazol Aspirin 1.20 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.59 0.4 0.2 0 0.31 (n=435) (n=420) Atherothrombotic 0.36 (n=869) (n=874) Lacunar #28-Tanahashi Occurrence of Intracranial Hemorrhage Cilostazol group (%) Aspirin group (%) 6 6 P=0.114, log-rank test Cumulative incidence Cumulative incidence P=0.829, log-rank test 4 2 Lacunar infarction Lacunar infarction 4 2 Atherothrombotic infarction Atherothrombotic infarction 00 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 0 1800 0 100 Days after randomization Stroke subtype 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Days after randomization Stroke subtype 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Lacunar 869 741 694 674 648 608 578 558 508 443 373 298 215 151 93 42 15 3 0 Lacunar 874 804 753 710 689 658 632 610 545 488 410 326 242 162 92 46 19 4 0 Atherothrombotic 435 367 341 331 317 310 296 286 262 225 182 141 105 71 41 25 13 4 0 Atherothrombotic 420 389 365 348 328 318 306 290 265 239 197 166 125 87 56 27 13 3 0 No. at risk 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 No. at risk #28-Tanahashi Design of S-ACCESS ● Multi-center, double-blind, randomized study conducted in Japan ● Subject : Ischemic stroke patients Sarpogrelate 100mgTID (n=750) n=1507 R 1.59 years – mean follow up Aspirin 81mg / day (n=757) -Primary Endpoint: Cerebral infarction -Secondary Endpoint: Clusters of serious vascular events (stroke, acute coronary syndrome, or vascular event-related death) Shinohara Y, et al. Stroke 2008; 39: 1827-1833. #28-Tanahashi Results of S-ACCESS (%/person-year) (%/person-year) P=0.19 7 1.2 6.1 1.0 6 1 4.9 Incidence 5 0.8 4 0.6 0.6 3 0.4 2 0.2 1 0 0 SPG ASA Primary endpoint Cerebral infarction SPG ASA Intracranial hemorrhage Intracranial hemorrhage #28-Tanahashi Design of CAPRIE ● Multi-center, double-blind, randomized study ● Subject : Patients with ischemic stroke, MI, or symptomatic PAD Clopidogrel 75mg/day 3 (n=9599) n=19185 R 1.91 years – mean follow up Aspirin 325mg/day (n=9586) -Primary Endpoint: Composite of ischemic stroke, MI, or vascular death -Secondary Endpoint: Amputation, vascular death CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet 1996; 348: 1329-1339. #28-Tanahashi Results of CAPRIE P=0.043 (%/person-year) 5.8 6 (%/person-year) 0.5 5.3 5 Incidence 0.4 4 0.3 0.3 3 0.2 0.2 2 0.1 1 0 CLO ASA Primary endpoint Ischemic stroke, MI, or vascular death 0 CLO ASA Intracranial hemorrhage Intracranial hemorrhage #28-Tanahashi Design of CHARISMA ● Multi-center, double-blind, randomized study ● Subject : Patients with clinically evident vascular disease or multiple risk factors n=15603 Clopidogrel 75mg/day + Aspirin 75 162mg/day (n=7802) R 28 months - median follow up Aspirin 75 - 162mg/day (n=7801) -Primary Endpoint: Composite of MI, stroke or deaths from cordiovascular causes -Secondary Endpoint: Composite of MI, stroke, death from cardiovascular causes, or hospitalization for unstable angina, TIA, or a revascularization procedure Bhatt DL, et al. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1706-1717. #28-Tanahashi Results of CHARISMA Incidence (%/person-year) (%/person-year) 5 0.5 4 0.4 2.9 3.1 3 0.3 2 0.2 0.1 1 0.1 0 0 CLO+ASA ASA Primary endpoint MI, stroke or deaths from cordiovascular causes CLO+ASA 0.1 ASA Intracranial hemorrhage Intracranial hemorrhage #28-Tanahashi Design of ESPRIT ● Multi-center, double-blind, randomized study ● Subject : TIA or minor stroke Aspirin 30-325mg/day + Dipyridamole 200mg BID (n=1363) n=2739 R 3.5 years – mean follow up Aspirin 30-325mg/day (n=1376) -Primary Endpoint: Composite of death from all vascular causes, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal MI, or major bleeding complication -Secondary Endpoint: Death from all causes, death from all vascular Causes, death from all vascular causes and non-fatal stroke, all major ischemic events, all vascular events The ESPRIT Study Group. Lancet 2006; 367: 1665-1673. #28-Tanahashi Results of ESPRIT (%/person-year) (%/person-year) 0.5 5 4.5 Incidence 4 0.4 0.4 3.6 0.3 3 0.3 2 0.2 1 0.1 0 ASA+DIP ASA Primary endpoint Death from all vascular causes, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal MI, or major bleeding complication 0 ASA+DIP ASA Intracranial hemorrhage Intracranial hemorrhage #28-Tanahashi Incidence of Intracranial Hemorrhage ― Western vs. Japan trials - Trials in Western Population Trials in Japanese Population (%/person-year) (%/person-year) 1.2 1.2 1 1 0.8 0.8 Incidence 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0 0 CLO ASA CAPRIE CLO+ASA ASA CHARISMA ASA+DIP ESPRIT ASA SGT ASA S-ACCESS CLZ ASA CSPS 2 Anti Thrombotic Therapy – 2010 Recurrent stroke prevention considering risk/benefit #28-Tanahashi Annual incidence of cerebral hemorrhage in general population Hisayamacho, Japan Male Hisayamacho, Japan Female Shibata, Japan East Asian Changsha, China Beijing, China Shanghai, China Hispanic New Mexico, USA Giessen, Germany Caucasian Framingham, USA Rochester, USA 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Annual incidence of cerebral hemorrhage (/100,000 person) Modified from Toyoda K.: Drugs, 69, 633-647, 2009 Kazunori Toyoda:Nikkei Medical on-line http://medical.nikkeibp.co.jp/inc/mem/pub/special/att/hcp/rensai/201008/516371.html (as of October 2010) Ethnic variation in adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding complications in the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) study. Multivariable analysis for bleeding complication: Moderate Bleeding Ethnic Group Adjusted HR (95% CI) $ p# Asians 3.15 (1.09-9.11) 0.034 Blacks 3.78 (1.35-10.60) 0.012 Whites 1.46 (0.63-3.36) 0.377 Hispanics #: 2-sided log-rank test $: Cox proportional hazards model 1.00 Referent NA Mark KH et al.: Am Heart J. Apr;157(4),658-665,2009 #28-Tanahashi Mechanism of Cilostazol on less bleeding Protective Effects of Cilostazol on Barrier Function of Vasculature ● Inhibition of MMP-9 expression which degrade peri-vascular matrix ●Improvement of Endothelial Barrier function PLoS ONE 1 December 2010 , Volume 5 e15178 Pharmacological Research 55 (2007) 104–110 #28-Tanahashi Summary • Intracranial hemorrhage was more frequent in S-ACCESS and CSPS2 compared with the trials conducted in western in the aspirin group • Cilostazol decrease Incidence of intracranial hemorrhage Compared with Aspirin • In CSPS2, more intracranial hemorrhage was observed in patients with lacunar infarction compared with those with atherothrombotic infarction. • High bleeding tendency in Japanese population might be attributable to high rate of lacunar patients (>60%) enrolled in these trials. #28-Tanahashi Conclusion Japanese population are considered to have higher bleeding tendency That ‘s reason why Lacuna infarcton is higher rate in japanese population Thus results of western trials may not be applicable to Japanese population.
© Copyright 2025 ExpyDoc