スライド 1 - UCLA Dept. of Mechanical Engineering

Based on the paper FT/P5-35
for 21st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference
16 - 21 October, Chengdu, China
Lithium Free-Surface Flow and
Wave Experiments
H.Horiike 1), H.Kondo 1), H.Nakamura 2),
S.Miyamoto 1), N.Yamaoka 1), T.Muroga 3)
1) Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
2) Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki, Japan
3National Institute for Fusion Science, Gifu, Japan
e-mail : [email protected]
Introduction
Back Ground
IFMIF
( International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility )
- Liquid Li Target
Item
Deuterium beam
energy / current
Averaged heat flux
Aim of this study
Investigation of the flow dynamics
- Surface fluctuation of the target
- Measurement technique
- Engineering issues
Beam deposition
area on Li jet
Jet width / thickness
Jet velocity
Nozzle geometry
40MeV / 250mA
Remarks
125mA nominal x 2 beams
1 GW/m2
0.2 m x 0.05 m
0.26 m / 0.025 m
15 m/s
Double-reducer
Nozzle contraction
ratio
10
Curvature of back
wall
0.25 m
Wave amplitude of
Li-free surface
~ 1 mm
Flow rate of Li
130 l/s
Inlet Temperature of
Li
250oC
Vacuum pressure
10-3 Pa
Materials
Reference from IFMIF Home Page
http://insdell.tokai-sc.jaea.go.jp/IFMIFHOME/i_target_en.html
Specification
RAF steel or
316SS
range: 10 - 20 m/s
based on Shima’s model
4 x 2.5
at Li free surface
(back wall)
2
Outline of Osaka Univ. Li Loop
Main loop : Test section, Void separation tank, EMP and EMF.
The total length : 40 m
Daughter loop : Cold Trap, EMP and EMF
Free-Surface Test Section
Void separation tank
1/2.5 scaled model of IFMIF Li target
Dump tank
Li Ingot
Electro-Magnetic Pump
ALIP type EMP
< 700 l/min
In a pit
Li inventory : 420 litter
In a pit
3
Outline of Free-Surface Test Section
Nozzle
Nozzle and Flow Channel
Shima’s model ×2 ( Two convergent sections )
Hight : 10mm, Width : 70mm ( 1/2.5 scale )
made of SS304
Straight Flow Channel
Viewing ports
Viewing ports and Shutter
4
Electro-Contact Probe apparatus
Fluctuations were measured on Li free surface
with using an Electro-Contact Probe apparatus
・ Two needles
mechanically fixed move together,
but electrically independent
・ Electric motor cylinder
to move the needles : 0.1 mm step
Set on the second viewing port (on the beam axis)
175 mm from the nozzle
needle 1 : 16 mm from the side wall
needle 2 : 35 mm (at the center of flow)
Electro-Contact Probe
Detection circuit
5
Measured Time Series Signals
Probes were moved with 0.1mm step,
while recording voltage signals.
No contact
- Recording time : 20 sec
- Sampling freq : 48 kHz ( using PCM recorder)
(a) 11.44mm
from wall
Higher than the Li free surface
contact
contacts were rare ( almost no contact)
Middle of the surface
contacts made frequently
Lower than the Li free surface
(b) 11.04mm
contacts were rare ( almost contact )
Schematic of contacts
(c) 10.74mm
at 10 m/s
Center of flow
6
Shapes of Li surface waves
Contact frequency and contact time rate were defined and calculated statistically from electric signals
Contact frequency :
Number of changes between contact and no-contact per unit time
Contact time rate :
The quotient of total contact period divided by recording time
(a) 5m/s
(b) 10m/s
(c) 15m/s
7
Average thickness and max wave amplitude
Average thickness of the flow
Height at maximum contact frequency
( = center of the fluctuation )
- in the lower velocity of 1 to 5 m/s, the thickness
shows a peak at ~ 4m/s
- in the velocity 5 to 10 m/s, the thickness continuously
increased gradually.
- in thr velocity of more than 11 m/s, the thickness
decreased to 10mm which equals the depth of nozzle
throat.
Amplitude of the fluctuation
defined as half height
between “no contact” and “full contact”.
- the amplitude increased with flow velocity
- in the velocity more than 12 m/s, the amplitude
seems to be saturated.
- the amplitude was 2 mm at 15 m/s.
8
Visual observation of the surface
Stroboscopic photography of the Li surface at 175mm downstream from the nozzle exit (second viewing port)
(a) 2 m/s
(b) 3 m/s
(c) 5 m/s
(d) 7 m/s
(e) 10 m/s
(f) 15 m/s
9
Boundary layer thickness
along the nozzle wall and at the nozzle exit
Momentum thickness d2 along the nozzle
was calculated [1]
Nozzle coordinate
1. velocity distribution along the nozzle wall
( potential model )
2. Development of laminar boundary layer
( method of Waltz )
Momentum thickness
3. Transition to turbulent
( Re d2 > 420 )
Transition
to turbulent
3. Development of turbulent boundary layer
( method of Buri )
4. Relaminarization
( acceleration parameter K )
Boundary layer thickness D at the nozzle
exit was estimated from the momentum
thickness
DD
D  2d 2 /(0.664)2
[1] K. Itoh et al., “Free-surface shear layer instabilities on a high-speed liquid jet”, Fusion Technol. 37 (2000) 74-88
10
Non-dimensional amplitude
Experimental results of the amplitude was
summarized to non-dimensional form,
non-dimensional amplitude : A/D
against
Weber number : We
Weber number was defined as
U0  r D
WeD 
T
2
.
where T: surface tension, r: density, U0 : mean velocity
The non-dimensional amplitude was well
predicted by square of We
A / D  0.278 We D  0.443 We D  0.00495
2
It is noted that the saturation above We of 5.5 is observed.
11
Summary
Experiment study on IFMIF liquid Li target was carried out with
using a 1/2.5 scale test channel.
Surface fluctuation of the target flow was measured by electrocontact probe apparatus.
As a result,
- Time series signals were represented by contact frequency.
- Waves of Gaussian like profiles were observed.
- Average thickness of the flow, and maximum amplitude of
surface fluctuation were plotted as a function of the velocity.
- The amplitude was described by non-dimensional form of
We number. This showed that the amplitude was well
predicted by square of We number, and it began to saturate
above velocity of 12-13m/s.
12