2011/12/5 EuroNCAP-JAMA Meeting＠JAMA 事務局からconfidential扱いで送付、18時目処 EuroNCAP – JAMA Meeting Nobuhiko TAKAHASHI Safety Subcommittee Safety & Environmental Technology Committee Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc. 1 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction to JAMA activities 2. JAMA’s activities for NCAPs 3. JAMA’s requests to NCAPs 4. NCAP assessment items and harmonization status 5. Requests to Euro NCAP concerning test methods 6. JAMA’s contribution to Euro NCAP 2 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 2 1. Introduction to JAMA activities ■ Name: Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc. (JAMA) ■ Established: ■ Members: April 3, 1967 14 companies in the field of automobile manufacturing (including the manufacture of motorcycles) ■ Organizations related to safety technologies: Executive Committee – Safety and Environmental Technology Committee – Safety Subcommittee ■ Activities: Development of industry common technologies related to safety ・ ・ ・ ・ Accident survey analysis Testing methods and dummies Simulation technologies Harmonization of standards 3 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 3 1. Introduction to JAMA activities ■ In April 2004, JAMA set eight priority safety issues for the next decade. ① Road accidents involving pedestrians and bicyclists ⑤ Traffic accidents at night ② Safety measures for the elderly ⑥ Accidents at intersections Vehicle measures that are in accordance with changes to physical characteristics accompanying aging based on research regarding the mechanisms of the occurrence of bodily injuries; the spread of driving support devices; the promotion of education programs; the further improvement of the rate of wearing seatbelts ③ Installation of seatbelt reminder systems, ensuring use of seatbelts in rear seats, etc. ⑦ Collisions with structural objects ④ Lags in driver recognition and failure to perform maneuvers ⑧ Compatibility Image映像記録型ドラレコ recording drive recorder 4 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 4 1. Introduction to JAMA activities ■ Three activity areas of JAMA ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Policy ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Studies on vehicle safety technologies (Following the Traffic Council’s reports) Accident research using JAMA drive recorder Pedestrians and bicyclists (studies using biofidelic FEM) Child safety (small-children buses; child restraint systems) Accidents involving large-sized vehicles Safety of electric vehicles Safety of microcompact and personal mobility ITS road infrastructures Driving positions and manners Traffic information sharing using navigations and IT technologies Anti-drunk driving technologies Collaboration between medical and engineering Further increase of seatbelt usage International harmonization of technical regulations ▪ Improvement of UN regulations and gtr ▪ Harmonization of biofidelic dummies ▪ Pole side impact, compatibility, Flex-PLI, etc Cooperation in vehicle assessment activity ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Passenger seatbelt reminders Rear passenger’s seatbelt usability Whiplash Pedestrian protection Rear passenger protection Active safety technology 5 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 5 1. Introduction to JAMA Activities Cooperation Competition Development of industry common safety technologies Development of safety technologies ・ Development of testing methods (Offset frontal impact, pedestrian protection, etc.) ・ Development of dummies (WorldSID, Pedestrian Legform Impactor, etc.) ・ Survey analysis of accidents ・ Development of simulation technologies ・ Harmonization of standards ・ Development of new safety technologies ・ Response to assessments ・ Conformity to regulations ・ Development of ASV technologies Initiatives by manufacturers Initiatives by JAMA 6 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 6 2. JAMA’s activities for NCAPs Major activities Rear passenger injury assessment method Rear passenger seatbelt reminders Testing methods for pedestrian protection 40% of vehicle width in contact with the barrier Deformable barrier Ceiling area Center console area FLEX-PLI Meter area Seatback area 7 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 7 2. JAMA’s activities for NCAPs Rear passenger injury assessment method 40% of vehicle width in contact with the barrier Deformable barrier Delete the chest G evaluation and set abdomen evaluation criteria (sliding scale)based on the latest engineering. JAMA proposed the rear passenger injury assessment method of JNCAP in 2009. 8 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 8 2. JAMA’s activities for NCAPs Rear passenger seatbelt reminders Ceiling area Meter area Center console area Seatback area Developed a quantitative assessment method for warning display positions and visual/auditory means of warning JNCAP started the assessment of rear passenger seatbelt reminders in vehicles from 2011 9 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 9 2. JAMA’s activities for NCAPs Testing methods for pedestrian protection Leg protection test (Flex-PLI) Injury risk curves Flex-PLI Knee ligament extension Tibia bending moment Drafted a test method using Flex-PLI Tibia-1 Tibia-2 Tibia-3 Test result graphics Set injury criteria Introduced the test method into JNCAP from 2011 Knee ligament injury ひざ じん帯損傷 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 Tibia-4 10 20 30 40 FlFlex-PLI ex- PLI ひざじん帯(M C L)のび量(m knee (MCL) extension [mm] m ) 傷害確率(% ) (%) of injury Probability Impact speed: 40 km/h of injury )(%) Probability 傷害確率(% Flex-PLI Tibia fracture すね 骨折 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 200 400 600 FlexPLI すね曲げモーメント(N m) Flex-PLI tibia bending moment [Nm] (Upper: knee, Lower: tibia) 10 Source: National Agency for Automotive Safety & Victim’s Aid （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 10 2. JAMA’s activities for NCAPs JAMA believes that NCAP should be one of the major activities to promote vehicle safety technologies. Not support Support To promote adoption of safety technologies Meaningless differentiation of safety performance, for examples, To assess items which has been already proven effective by accident analysis, for examples, ・ Rear passenger seatbelt collarbone dislocation ・ Unique test condition or criteria not considering international harmonization ・ Side curtain airbags ・ Rear passenger protection assessment ・ Seatbelt reminders ・ Pedestrian leg protection (Flex-PLI) 11 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 11 2. JAMA’s activities for NCAPs PSチェック Example of “not support” FIVE STAR AWARD （New Safety Assessment ☆☆☆☆☆JNCAP FIVE STAR) New overall rating Impact safety Full-lap Offset Side crash Rear: neck protection Support All 5★ winning models Pedestrian protection Head protection Leg protection No 5★ winners Not support “JNCAP SPECIAL AWARD” Passenger seatbelt reminders (PSBR) Top-score mini-car model “JNCAP PRIZE of Light Car” Top-score 5★ winning model “JNCAP FIRST PRIZE” ・Meaningless to compete 0.1 point within 5stars ・NCAP should be a measure to encourage safety improvement. 12 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 12 3. JAMA’s requests to NCAPs PSチェック Harmonization of NCAPs globally Make assessment items and test methods identical globally. Point calculation methods may vary to reflect regional situation. Reasons: Even the goal to reduce fatalities and injuries is same, different test methods exist among countries and regions. Different test methods impose heavy development workloads on automobile manufacturers. If the test methods are unified, test results can be shared among NCAPs, helping with the growth of NCAPs globally. 13 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 13 3. JAMA’s requests to NCAPs PSチェック Harmonization of NCAPs globally Harmonize: ■ Test methods (full-lap, offset, side crash, whiplash, pedestrian protection...) ■ Dummies (Hybrid-III, THOR, ES-2, WorldSID, BioRID II...), barriers, etc. Test items Test items Assessment criteria Assessment criteria 14 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 14 4. NCAP assessment items and harmonization status Impact safety Region Name Frontal impact Side impact Full lap China Japan CNCAP JNCAP NCAP China JPN USA ○ ○ ○ Euro Offset MDB ○ ○ Euro Euro ○ ○ ○ USA China JPN ○ ENCAP ANCAP KNCAP LANCAP Euro Euro ○ ○ （○） Euro Euro Euro Euro Euro Euro USA USA Euro Euro Euro Euro ○ ○ ○ ○ USA ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ JPN ○ USA USA ○ ○ Euro (○) SLD （ISA) Euro Euro ○ ○ (○) ○ Euro JPN Rollover AEB （+ other) S.America Euro ○ Brake SBR Korea ○ JPN Pedestrians Australia USA2 USA ○ Europe USA ○ JPN Whiplash ESC USA1 IIHS USA Pole Children Active safety JPN U.S.A. JPN (○) (○) Euro Euro (○) Euro Euro (○) Euro Euro (○) (○) ○ (○) * CANCAP considered not applicable to the U.S. 15 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 15 5. Requests to Euro NCAP concerning test methods Harmonize test methods: Expectations to Euro NCAP Many NCAPs have adopted Euro NCAP’s test methods. Euro NCAP is expected to be the key player of harmonization. JAMA expects leadership by Euro NCAP to accelerate harmonization among NCAPs. 16 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 16 6. JAMA’s contribution to Euro NCAP Discussion Regular (annual) meeting between Euro NCAP and JAMA 17 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 17 Thank You for Your Attention! 18 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 18 参考資料 19 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 19 Appendix－Spread of safety technologies It is important to have “strategies” to raise demand among users for safer automobiles. 削除 Users Value for money Willingness to buy Learning correct methods of use Automobile manufacturers Governments Provision of “rationale” technologies Driving force Effectiveness Regulations Affordability Assessment Attractiveness Incentives Joint tasks Assessment of effects in the real world Increasing safe driving consciousness and safe driving manners 20 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 20 1. 自工会の紹介～ 1.3. 自工会の安全技術開発サイクル 事故分析結果に基づき、 被害軽減効果の高いところから取り組むという原則 事故分析 安全技術開発 試験法開発 基準調和活動 自工会の活動 各社毎の活動 21 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 21 1. 自工会の紹介～ 1.4. 自工会の交通安全重点課題 自工会では2004年4月に、今後10年間における交通安全の重点課題として 以下の8項目を取り上げ、取り組みを積極的に展開することとして公表した。 ①歩行者・自転車の事故 ⑤夜間の交通事故 ②高齢者対策 ⑥交差点の事故 人体傷害発生ﾒｶﾆｽﾞﾑ研究に基づく加齢に伴う身体特 性変化を踏まえた車両対策、運転支援装置の普及、 教育ﾌﾟﾛｸﾞﾗﾑ推進、ｼｰﾄﾍﾞﾙﾄ着用率のさらなる向上 ③シートベルト非着用警報装置の装着、 後席シートベルトの着用啓発等 ⑦工作物衝突 ④運転者の認知遅れ・不操作 ⑧コンパティビリティ 映像記録型ドラレコ 22 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 22 1. 自工会の紹介～ 1.6. 自工会の安全評価技術開発への貢献 後席乗員傷害 評価法開発 歩行者保護 試験法の開発 世界統一側面衝突ダミー ＷｏｒｌｄＳＩＤの開発 後席シートベル トリマインダー研 究 世界統一の次世代前突ダ ミーTHOR研究 23 （社）日本自動車工業会・安全部会 (C) Copyright Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., All rights reserved. 23
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc
