Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics in Penetrating Keratoplasty by Trephine Blade and Femtosecond Laser Koichi Wakimasu1, Osamu Hieda2, and Shigeru Kinoshita2 1Baptist Eye Clinic, Kyoto, Japan. 2Department of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. The authors have no financial interests in the subject matter of this poster. Background • Recently, zig-zag penetrating keratoplasty (z-PKP) by use of a femtosecond laser has become available. • z-PKP is expected to increase postoperative corneal strength more than penetrating keratoplasty by trephine blade (t-PKP). Form of the Zig-Zag Cut 7.2mm 30° Anterior Side Cut Ring Lamellar Cut 30° Posterior Side Cut 6.6mm 8.3mm Ring Lamellar Cut: depth 300 μm, width 1.00 mm The start position (depth) of the cut is in the anterior chamber for the donor, and at the thinnest corneal endothelium for the recipient. z-PKP anterior segment OCT(Visante™) t-PKP Corneal Biomechanics • Objects are deformed by pressurization, and attempt to return to their original shape through decompression. • Viscoelastic bodies have a deformation different deformation process between pressurization and decompression. = “hysteresis” pressure Ocular Response AnalyzerTM (ORA, Reichert) first “inward” applanation second “outward” applanation (pressurization) (decompression) applanation signal P1 pressure P2 * *corneal hysteresis (CH) = P1-P2(mmHg) #corneal resistance factor (CRF) = P1-k1P2(mmHg); parameter considered to be more related to the corneal elastic resistance than CH Purpose • To evaluate corneal biomechanics after t-PKP and z-PKP. Patients and Methods Corneal IOP(mmHg) Thickness(μm) M/F Age t-PKP (23 eyes) 12 / 9 72.9±10.8 586±63 12±4 z-PKP (10 eyes) 6 / 4 67.2±12.6 568±48 15±5 DSAEK (6 eyes) 2 / 4 66.7±17.1 635±50 15±6 Control (27 eyes) 6 / 21 73.6±6.8 564±20 14±3 ・ IntraLase FS-60TM in 7 eyes and iFS in 3 eyes (AMO) were used for femtosecond laser. ・ There was no significant difference in age, corneal thickness , and IOP between each group. ・ CH and CRF were measured by ORA more than 6 months after keratoplasty, and after removal of the running suture in t-PKP and z-PKP. Results 1: CH CH (mmHg) 10 t-PKP :8.29±1.53mmHg z-PKP :9.75±1.76mmHg 5 (p < 0.05) DSAEK :9.95±1.45mmHg (p < 0.05) control :10.7±1.43mmHg (p < 0.0001) 0 t-PKP z-PKP DSAEK control ・ CH of t-PKP was significantly lower than that of z-PKP, DSAEK, and the Controls. Results 2: CRF CRF (mmHg) 10 t-PKP :7.73±2.29mmHg z-PKP :9.77±2.41mmHg 5 DSAEK :9.93±3.62mmHg (p < 0.05) control :9.90±1.58mmHg (p < 0.05) (p < 0.01) 0 t-PKP z-PKP DSAEK control ・ CRF of t-PKP was also significantly lower than that of z-PKP, DSAEK, and the Controls. References <CH> t-PKP results 8.29 1) 10.16 2) 8.9 3) 8.95 control 10.7 11.43 10.6 9.78 <CRF> t-PKP control results 7.73 9.90 1) 9.94 11.53 2) 8.1 10.2 3) 10.26 9.75 1)Yenerel NM, et al. Cornea 2010;29:1247-51. 2)Laiquzzaman M, et al. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2010;38:758-63. 3) Joo Young Shin, et al. Korean J Ophthalmology 2010;24:139-142. Discussion ・Corneal strength after penetrating keratoplasty by trephine blade is considered to be less than that of the normal eye and of after DSAEK. ・Corneal strength after zig-zag penetrating keratoplasty by femtosecond laser is close to that of the normal eye and of after DSAEK.
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc