PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

Economic Development of Japan
No.8 1930s and War Economy
Democratic
institution
(Form)
Constitution
Laws
Parliament
Election
Court
Full
democracy
US rule
Showa2
1960
Now
1945-51
Democratization
New constitution
LDP dominance
Lack of policy debate
Military rises
1931 Democracy
movement,
Party cabinet
1937
Defeat
War
Male suffrage 1925
Showa1
Taisho
Constitution 1889
Parliament
Fascism 1937-45
Edo
Pure
dictatorship
Meiji
Political fights
Reform vs conservatism, big vs small
government, other policy debates
(Content)
Political
competition
Two-party Politics 1924-1932
PP.130-32
Minsei Party 民政党
Seiyukai 政友会
(Kenseikai until 1927)
(Estab. in 1900 by Hirobumi Ito)
Economy
Small government, free market,
fiscal austerity & industrial
restructuring for return to gold
Big government, fiscal activism,
local public works for securing
votes
Foreign
policy
Oppose militarism, protect
Japan’s interest by diplomacy,
promote disarmament
To attack Minsei Party, support
military and fascism if necessary,
even deny democracy
Remark
Peace orientation is laudable,
but stubborn deflation policy
caused fascism to gain force
Economic recovery policy was
welcomed, but its opportunism
severely undermined democracy
Seiyukai statements:
“Prof. Minobe’s theory denies the supreme dignity of Emperor. Just banning his
books is not enough.”
“Go, go, Japan, the leader of Asia, the vast land of Manchuria and Mongolia is
waiting for you!!!” (election campaign song)”
Northeastern China today
Shidehara Diplomacy
PP.106-9
Kijuro Shidehara, 1872-1951
Foreign Minister, 1924-27, 1929-31
Prime Minister 1945-46
His policy was more moderate than before or after him
• Maintain good relations with US and UK
• Respect Washington Naval Disarmament Treaty (1921-22)
• No military intervention in China; secure Japan’s economic
interest through diplomacy and negotiation
• When China protests and resists, his diplomacy breaks down
• Domestically, criticized as Coward Diplomacy
• Fail to stop Manchurian Incident (1931) started by Kantogun
(Japanese Army stationed in China)
Tanaka Cabinet (Seiyukai), 1927-1929
• The Oriental Conference (Japan’s policy toward Giichi Tanaka
1864-1929
China): defend Japan’s interests in ManchuriaMongolia 満蒙, but welcome FDI from any country.
• Send Japanese troops to prevent Chiang Kai-shek 蒋介
石’s army to unify China (1927 & 1928).
• Suppress communists and proletariat parties.
• Strengthen Security Maintenance Law 治安維持法
(introduce death penalty).
• Kantogun 関東軍 (Japanese army in China) kills
Chinese military leader 張作霖 by train bombing. PM
Tanaka did not report the truth to Emperor. Emperor
criticizes him and he resigns.
Hamaguchi Cabinet (Minsei Party), 1929-31
Finance Minister
Junnosuke Inoue
Prime Minister
Osachi Hamaguchi
Foreign Minister
Kijuro Shidehara
• Fiscal austerity and industrial restructuring for returning to
gold standard ($1=2 yen)
• Disarmament (supported by people, opposed by navy)
• Social policies for workers and farmers
Hamaguchi Cabinet is regarded as the crown of pre-WW2 democracy
achievement. However, its stubborn deflation policy encouraged
fascism and militarism, despite Minsei Party’s peace orientation.
Promoting Naval Disarmament
• London Naval Disarmament Treaty (1930) signed and
ratified against opposition by Navy and Privy Council
(cruisers & submarines, 69.75% vs 70% of US/UK tonnage)
• Navy attacks government for “violation of Emperor’s
supreme command authority” 統帥権干犯
• Seiyukai supports Navy to undermine Minsei Party
Government (=helping fascism)
• PM Hamaguchi shot at Tokyo Station (1930), dies
next year
Note: Before WW2, many PMs were assassinated or
almost killed: Ito, Okuma, Hara, Inukai, Hamaguchi,
Takahashi, Saito, Suzuki
PP.126-130
Showa Economic Crisis 昭和恐慌
Causes
(1) Impact of global depression
(2) Austerity policy initiated and continued by FM Inoue
Consequences
(1) Severe price deflation
(2) Rural impoverishment, coupled with famine
(3) Cartelization and rationalization (“free market doesn’t work”)
(4) Rise of fascism (army, navy, right-wing groups)
--Rejection of party politics
Nominal GNP (bil yen)
20
--“Reform” movement
1/ Military readiness for total war
2/ Totalitarian state for the benefit
of farmers and workers
15
10
5
0
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
PP.131-32
Takahashi Budget and Recovery 1932-36
• Korekiyo Takahashi, FM in Inukai Seiyukai Cabinet and two
other cabinets (1932-36)--“Japanese Keynes”
• “If someone saves 30,000 yen out of his income of 50,000 yen,
his savings will increase, which is fine for him. But from the
viewpoint of national economy, his saving will surely reduce
demand elsewhere, which lowers national output. For the
nation, it is actually better that this person spend all his income
of 50,000 yen.” (Takahashi speech on austerity and returning
to gold standard, 1929)
• Reversing Inoue’s austerity policy
--Terminate gold standard, let yen fall
--BOJ monetization of fiscal deficit
--“Spending Policy” on public works
Takahashi was assassinated by
rebellion army in 1936
Manchurian Incident (1931)
PP.133-35
(Sep. 18 Incident)
• Kantogun (関東軍 Japanese army stationed in China) initiates
well-planned invasion of Manchuria without informing Tokyo
• Tokyo Government and Army HQ try to stop it but fails
 Kantogun is now uncontrollable
 Violating “open door, equal opportunity” principle
• US Secretary of State Stimson’s press statement undermines
FM Shidehara (regarding Jinzhou bombing)
• Seiyukai (Inukai) Government declares the “independence” of
Manchuria (1932).
• The League of Nations determines that Manchuria is not an
independent state and Japan’s action is not self-defense
 Japan withdraws from the League of Nations (1933)
Multiplicity of Political Players and Policy Debates
(1930s until the outbreak of Japan-China War (July 1937)
Democracy
ProZaibatsu,
Pro-Capitalism
Workers’
&
Farmers’
Rights
Fascism/militarism
Minsei
Party
Seiyukai Party
Ugaki
“Proletariat” parties
Military
Political parties in parliament
Army factions
無産政党
民政党
政友会
陸軍統制派
陸軍皇道派
Proletariat
parties
Minsei
Party
Seiyukai
Party
Discipline
Faction
Imperial
Faction
Gain seats under
broad voter base,
demands social
policies
Opposes fascism,
promotes social
policies
Supports fascism
to undermine
Minsei Party
Social reform
through
parliament
Social reform thru
coup & terrorism
Navy
Attempt to
cooperate to fight
fascism fails
Dissatisfied with
two major parties,
sympathetic to
“social reform” by
fascio groups
Lose election
Feb. 1936
Anti-military criticism
in parliament
DEMOCRACY
X
Rivalry among
fascio groups
R Wing
Political terrorism
1931‐36
Failed coup
Feb. 26 Incident, 1936
Dominant &
suppressive
Japan-China War, 1937
X
FASCIO
Why People & Media Supported Military?
(Not all of them, but some)
• The Sense of “Crisis in Manchuria-Mongolia”
満蒙の危機—need to protect Japan’s interests against
the emergence of anti-Japanese movement in China;
Shidehara Diplomacy is regarded as too soft
• Showa Economic Crisis—workers and farmers
suffer severely while big businesses make money
• Disgust with political parties—both Seiyukai and
Minsei Party are regarded as corrupt and unfriendly
to workers’ welfare
• However, some journalists criticized militarism
consistently--Tanzan Ishibashi 石橋湛山, Kiyoshi
Kiyosawa 清沢冽
War Economy 1937-45
PP.136-39
• Political debate and democracy completely suppressed.
• Economic planning to mobilize people and resources
under private ownership (no nationalization).
1937-39 Planning Board, National Mobilization Law; State
Power Management Law
1939-41 Control over civil life becomes pervasive
1941-44 Total war with US--Ministry of Military Demand;
Military Needs Company Act
1944-45 Economic collapse due to lack of inputs
War with China prolongs  Resource shortage within
Yen Bloc  Invade SEA for more resources  Total
war with US and rest of the world
Military Production
Consumer Product Supply
(1937=100)
(1933=100)
2500
160
Weapons & ammunition
2000
Food
120
Planes (navy)
Battleships
1500
Total
140
Planes (army)
Clothing
100
80
1000
60
40
500
20
1953
1951
1949
1947
1945
1943
1941
1939
1937
1935
1945
1944
1943
1942
1941
1940
1939
1938
1937
1936
1935
1934
1933
1932
1931
1933
0
0
Million tons
25
Other
Oil from SEA
Nonferrous metals
Iron ore
Coal
20
15
10
Maritime Transport
during Pacific War
1941-1945
5
0
1942:H1
1942:H2
1943:H1
1943:H2
1944:H1
1944:H2
1945:H1
PP.140-41
Origin of the Post-WW2 Japan System
• Featuring long-term commitments and official intervention
Government-led industrial drive, administrative guidance,
subcontracting, lifetime employment, keiretsu, mainbanks,
friendly trade unions, BOJ window guidance, etc.
• Negative view—this system was installed artificially after
1937 to execute war. It continued to work reasonably well in
the 1950s-60s, but it is now obsolete.
• Positive view—advanced industrialization requires such
features. Free markets do not generate high-tech or heavy
industries. Japan needed such a system to develop.
 This means laissez-faire policy supports light industries and
simple processing only; to go further, developing countries
need above features even today.