航空管制にかかる周辺諸国との協力 航空局交通管制部管制課長

Ministry of Land Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
CIVIL AVATION BUREAU OF JAPAN
From Domestic to Cross Border ATFM
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop
3rd – 4th September 2015
Japan Civil Aviation Bureau
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
History of Air Traffic Management in Japan
Tactical ATC
Flow control restrictions as occasion demands were
taken by ACCs to cope with air traffic congestion.
No computer system to support proper judgment.
Unnecessary delay and concentration of traffic in major
airports.
1994 ~
ATFM Center
The ATFMC was established and began modern
operation by introducing computer system.
However, those function was quite limited. It was only
providing air traffic flow management services.
2005 ~
ATM Center
In order to respond to a further increase in air traffic
volume, the ATFMC was upgraded to the ATMC by adding
a full-scale ASM function and the oceanic ATM function. By
tightly linking these three functions based on the concept of
CDM, the ATM center developed a comprehensive ATM
service.
Tokyo and Naha FIR were integrated into Fukuoka FIR.
~ 1994
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
2
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
International Air Traffic Flow in Japan
ANCHORAGE
FIR
50N
Anchorage
East coast of USA
Europe/Russia
SAPPORO ACC
West coast of USA
40N
Korea
INCHEON
FIR
China
TOKYO ACC
FUKUOKA ACC
ATM CENTER
Hawaii
30N
NAHA ACC
FUKUOKA FIR
OAKLAND FIR
South East Asia
MANILA FIR
Guam/Australia
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New
20N Delhi, India
140E
160E
3
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Traffic growth in Japan
 International flight and flying-over are increased. Domestic flight is dependent on the case of GDP.
 Even if GDP is estimated low, the number of aircrafts will exceed the limit of air traffic control capacity
around 2025.
 The demand may go up rather than this forecast by further promotion of inbound tourism and the growth of LCC.
Traffic volume (thousand/ year )
2,200
Actual
value
2,000
Reference
Predicted
value
1,800
1,666
1,671
1,605
1,553
1,393
1,400
1,303
1,414
Actual
1,346
1,285
1,208
1,200
1,973
1,834
1,713
1,600
2,092
Upper case
Actual
実績値
Flying- over
1,000
Middle
上位ケース
Upper case
Lower
1,029
International
800
714
600
882
826
755
838
811
774
Medium
中位ケース
Lower
下位ケース
Domestic
400
200
0
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
(FY)
2040
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
4
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
ATM and Traffic volume in Japan
 Location and Traffic Flow
 1 FIR, 1 ATMC, 4 ACCs,
For Anchorage,
Seattle
60/day
For Europe/Russia
80/day
For China, Korea
330/day
For China
180/day
Tokyo
For SFO, LAX
190/day
Hawaii
40/day
ATMC
Guam, Australia
70/day
For Hong-Kong, Taipei
290/day
For Manila, Jakarta
50/day
Average Flight counts per day
RJTT
(Haneda) airport
1060
(ARR & DEP)
RJAA
(Narita) airport
570
(ARR & DEP)
Average Flight counts per day ( IFR only )
Total
Domestic
flight
International
flight
Over
flight
4,110
2,300
1290
520
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
5
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Air Traffic Volume Trend
Domestic Air Traffic
Flow
New Chitose
Osa
ka
flow control initiatives
for airports
3%1%
7%
89%
Tokyo(RJT
T)
Narita
Fukuoka
Narita
Fukuoka
Chubu
Tokyo
Kansai
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
6
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
ATFM and ASM
Monitor of air traffic flow and volume
Route coordination with aircraft operators
Flow control
ATFM
ASM
Designing of airspace and airways
Management of civil training and testing airspace
Coordination with military for flexible use of airspace
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
7
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Training and
Restricted Areas
C-1
A
C-2
B-2
C-3
B-1 B-3
SUPER
SONIC
G-2
High altitude training/testing areas
for the Self-Defense Force
Restricted areas for the
Self-Defense’s use
G-3
G-1
G-4
U
Restricted areas for the U.S.
Force
N-21 N-22
N-23
N-1 N-24 Q
L
R105
J-2
J-3
J-1
K-1
P-1
P-6 R104
P-1 P-3
P-2
40N
H
D-4
D-3
D-2
D-1
E-3 E-4
E-2
E-1
R121
K-2
135E
P-1
S-2
S-1
W173A
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
8
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Capacity Management
 ATMC set Capacity-value by considering ATC workload.

SECTOR :
Direct assessment of ATC Workload
( “Time Summation” of ATC tasks)

AIRPORT :
Direct assessment of Runway & Airspace capacity
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
9
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Capacity Management
- Sector  Acceptable Controllers work loads per 30min.
Sector capacity
ATC Workload
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
10
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Time Summation
Controller’s Workload vs. Time Frame of reference
Task analysis on each sector
- required time for each separate task
- frequency of occurrence regarding each task
- aircraft’s flight time of the sector
Definition
of
Workload Value
Identification
Radar Vector
Altitude Clearance
QNH Information
Work Time for
Communication
Traffic information
Hand-off
Adaptation
to
actual flight
plan
Planning
Surveillance
Hand work
Consideration Time
Time-frame
of
reference
30min
Decision Making
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
11
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Coefficient of Controller’s Workload
Calculation of Coefficient
Coefficient of Controller’s Workload =
A unit value per minute
Average Controller’s Workload
Average Staying Time
Passing
Established on every flight
type in each sector
Arrival
Departure
Local
○○Sector
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
12
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Operationally weighted workload

Workload is valued according to:
- Sector Characteristics
- Flight Type Characteristics
Factors of Sector Characteristics
Flight Type Characteristics
Airspace Structure
-Size
-Form (Relation to other airspace)
Airspace Complexity
-Airways, Routes, Intersections
-Traffic Flow concerning Airports
Passing
Sector
Arriving
D&A(I)
Departing
Ratio of Flight Types
etc.
Workload not equal to the number of traffic
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
13
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Capacity Management
- Airport  Acceptable Number of aircraft per 30min, and
 Acceptable spacing time in ACA per 10min.
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
14
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Capacity Management
- Airport - Runway Cap : 15 per 30min
Airport Capacity evaluation
+ Spacing time
Airspace Cap: 10min
ETA
ELDG
SPCE
1
1200
1200
0
2
1200
1202
2
3
1201
1204
3
4
1201
1206
5
5
1202
1208
6
6
1202
1210
8
7
1202
1212
10
8
1203
1214
11
9
1204
1216
12
10
1204
1218
14
11
1214
1220
6
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
15
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Flow Control - Airport Spacing time
(min)
Estimated
traffic volume
Differentials between
ETAs and ELDGs
(Departure and
Arrival per 30 min)
Departure
Arrival
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
16
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Flow Control - Airport After flow control
Before flow control
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
17
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Collaborative Decision Making
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
18
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
CDM Web Conference
【ATFM DAILY PLAN】
***ATM OPERATIONS PLAN***
VALID 2009/0701/2345 THRU 0545
-CAPACITY(CAPA) & CONSTRAINTSRJCC : 2100-0300 CAPA=04-06△ LOW VIS
RJTT : 0200-0300 CAPA=10
RWY 34L/16R CLSD (0200-0245 CONST)
0300-//// CAPA=14
FLTCK (ILS RWY22)
T01 : 0130-//// CAPA=92-97 DEV (CB)
-INITIATIVERJCC : 0010-0150 5MINIT DEP FM RJTT
RJTT : 2330-0140 EDCT
T12 : 2300-0005 3MINIT DEP FM RJAA/RJTT
G585 : 0130-UFN 8MINIT @ SAPRA RGDLS OF ALT
WB FOR MONGOLIA, RUSSIA, EUROPE
<POSSIBLE>
RJAA : 0330-0500 15MIT, 250KT @ MELON, MAMAS
RJTT : 0300-//// EDCT
-OTHER-
Participants: ATMC, ATC facilities, Airlines, Meteorological
agency
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015
New Delhi, India
19
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Recent achievements of International ATFM
Japan – Taipei ACC
(2014 FY)
Direction and
FIR BDY :Airway
West bound at FIR
BDY
BULAN:A1,
SALMI: B576
IGURU:G581
SEDKU:R595
Target
Number of
ATFM
implementatio
n
For RCTP
(RWY construction)
For RCTP
(WX and other
reason)
341
14
RJBB
55
25
For VHHH/VMMC
For RPLL VTBS etc.
East bound at FIR
BDY
MOLKA :M750
IGURU :G581
BORDO :R583
SEDKU:R595
RJCC
RJFF
5
For RJAA/RJTT
440
RJGG
500
BULAN
Total
MOLKA
SEDKU
400
ROAH
300
200
IGURU
VHHH
RJAA
Number of ATFM
implementation 2014FY
SALMI
RCTP
RJTT
other
14
VHHH/V
MMC
341
RCTP
(Other
reason)
RCTP
(Runway
Closure)
100
0
West Bound
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
20
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Recent achievements of International ATFM
Japan – Republic of Korea (2014 FY)
Number of ATFM
implementation 2014FY
600
Seoul
500
400
RJCC
101
300
ZBAA
Beijing
200
RJTT
RKSI/RKSS
0
RJAA
SAPRA
RJBB
347
100
LANAT
ZBTJ
RJGG
AP in
China
Direction and FIR
BDY :Airway
West Bound
Target
East bound at FIR
BDY
LANAT:G597
Number of
ATFM
implementation
For AP in China
31
347
101
40
For RJAA/RJTT
2
For RKSI/RKSS
West bound at FIR
BDY
SAPRA:G585
AP beyond
Korea
(China and
Europe)
For
AP
Korea
beyond
For ZBAA
521
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - Total
4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
21
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
10
04
*** ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GRPH (SECTOR) ***
AREA :
TI ME :
Sharing Information
T27
0350-0640
5k
t
Sharing Information
37
0
0℃
150
03: 51
50
40
10
04
C
A
T
~
3
93
05
0
kt
15
kt
Importance of information sharing
L
15
kt
15
L
5k
t
30
10
kt
1012
20
H
6
10
0
Other ACC
Information
Exchange
■
■
■
■
Incheon ACC
Taipei ACC
*** ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GRPH (SECTOR) ***
CAPA
Information
Exchange
04
00
04
10
04
20
04
30
04
40
04
50
05
00
05
10
05
20
05
30
05
40
05
50
06
00
06
10
06
20
06
30
06
40
0
0
0
28
28
37
0
1
0
28
29
37
0
1
0
28
29
37
0
3
0
27
30
37
0
5
0
27
32
37
0
10
0
26
36
37
o
13
0
24
37
37
1
15
0
22
38
37
1
17
0
21
39
37
1
20
0
19
40
37
2
18
0
19
39
37
2
19
0
17
38
37
2
18
0
14
34
37
3
17
0
12
32
37
3
16
0
10
29
37
6
15
0
8
29
37
7
16
0
7
30
37
7
17
0
7
31
37
HH
MM
ATMC
AREA : T27
TIME : 0350-0640
03:51
03:51
50
VLADI VOSTOK FI R
T05
S03
40
S02
S21
PYONGYANG FI R
F01
F03
F02
T22
T18
T31
F08
F05
F06
F07
T29
S01
T02
T01
T27
T21
TARGU FI R
T03
T20
30
T04
T12
T26
T08
T09
T10
T24
T17
20
T11
T32
T16
10
T19
N01
N07
N01
N02
0
0
N02
03
50
04
00
04
10
0
0
0
28
28
37
0
1
0
28
29
37
0
1
0
28
29
37
TAI
PEI 04
FI R
04
20
30
04
40
0
3
0
27
30
37
0
5
0
27
32
37
0
10
0
26
36
37
04
50
N06
o
13
0
24
37
37
05
00
05
10
05
20
1
15
0
22
38
37
1
17
0
21
39
37
1
20
0
19
40
37
05
30
05
40
05
50
06
00
06
10
06
20
06
30
06
40
2
18
0
19
39
37
2
19
0
17
38
37
2
18
0
14
34
37
3
17
0
12
32
37
3
16
0
10
29
37
6
15
0
8
29
37
7
16
0
7
30
37
7
17
0
7
31
37
N05
HH
MM
■
■
■
■
SCHDU
PLAN
PLN-E
IN-FL
TOTAL
CAPA
03
50
04
00
04
10
04
20
04
30
04
40
04
50
05
00
05
10
05
20
05
30
05
40
05
50
06
00
06
10
06
20
06
30
06
40
0
0
0
28
28
37
0
1
0
28
29
37
0
1
0
28
29
37
0
3
0
27
30
37
0
5
0
27
32
37
0
10
0
26
36
37
o
13
0
24
37
37
1
15
0
22
38
37
1
17
0
21
39
37
1
20
0
19
40
37
2
18
0
19
39
37
2
19
0
17
38
37
2
18
0
14
34
37
3
17
0
12
32
37
3
16
0
10
29
37
6
15
0
8
29
37
7
16
0
7
30
37
7
17
0
7
31
37
HH
MM
Coordination
Coordination
*** ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GRPH (SECTOR) ***
*** ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GRPH (SECTOR) ***
AREA : T27
TIME : 0350-0640
40
S02
T22
T18
T31
F08
Restriction
04
10
04
20
30
04
40
0
1
0
28
29
37
0
3
0
27
30
37
0
5
0
27
32
37
0
10
0
26
36
37
o
13
0
24
37
37
T20
30
05
20
1
20
0
19
40
37
T05
40
S02
F03
F02
T22
T18
T31
F08
F05
05
50
06
00
06
10
06
20
06
30
06
40
2
18
0
14
34
37
3
17
0
12
32
37
3
16
0
10
29
37
6
15
0
8
29
37
7
16
0
7
30
37
7
17
0
7
31
37
HH
MM
■
■
■
■
SCHDU
PLAN
PLN-E
IN-FL
TOTAL
CAPA
F06
F07
04
00
04
10
04
20
04
30
04
40
04
50
05
00
05
10
05
20
05
30
05
40
05
50
06
00
06
10
06
20
06
30
06
40
0
1
0
28
29
37
0
1
0
28
29
37
0
3
0
27
30
37
0
5
0
27
32
37
0
10
0
26
36
37
o
13
0
24
37
37
1
15
0
22
38
37
1
17
0
21
39
37
1
20
0
19
40
37
2
18
0
19
39
37
2
19
0
17
38
37
2
18
0
14
34
37
3
17
0
12
32
37
3
16
0
10
29
37
6
15
0
8
29
37
7
16
0
7
30
37
7
17
0
7
31
37
HH
MM
■
■
■
■
SCHDU
PLAN
PLN-E
IN-FL
TOTAL
CAPA
T02
T03
T20
30
T04
T12
T26
T08
T09
T10
T24
T17
20
T11
T32
T16
10
T19
N01
N01
N02
0
03
50
0
0
0
28
28
37
T29
S01
T01
F01
20
10
N07
05
40
2
19
0
17
38
37
03:51
S04
S03
T27
20
05
30
2
18
0
19
39
37
N05
T21
TARGU FI R
T08
T11
T19
0
05
10
1
17
0
21
39
37
S21
30
T04
T09
T10
T24
T32
10
05
00
1
15
0
22
38
37
VLADI VOSTOK FI R
PYONGYANG FI R
T02
T03
T12
T26
T17
T16
N01
04
50
N06
AREA : T27
TIME : 0350-0640
03:51
50
40
T29
S01
T01
F02
F06
F07
N01
N02
N02
04
00
0
1
0
28
29
37
NORTH AREA
EAST AREA
WEST AREA
SOUTH AREA
T05
S03
S21
T27
T21
F01
F03
F05
TAI PEI04FI R
03
50
0
0
0
28
28
37
50
VLADI VOSTOK FI R
PYONGYANG FI R
TARGU FI R
N07
0
*** ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GRPH (SECTOR) ***
AREA : T27
TIME : 0350-0640
03:51
50
S04
NORTH AREA
EAST AREA
WEST AREA
SOUTH AREA
30
20
10
SCHDU
PLAN
PLN-E
IN-FL
TOTAL
CAPA
*** ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GRPH (SECTOR) ***
AREA : T27
TIME : 0350-0640
03:51
50
40
■
■
■
■
0
N02
03
50
04
00
04
10
0
0
0
28
28
37
0
1
0
28
29
37
0
1
0
28
29
37
TAI
PEI 04
FI R
04
20
30
04
40
0
3
0
27
30
37
0
5
0
27
32
37
0
10
0
26
36
37
04
50
N06
o
13
0
24
37
37
05
00
05
10
05
20
1
15
0
22
38
37
1
17
0
21
39
37
1
20
0
19
40
37
05
30
05
40
05
50
06
00
06
10
06
20
06
30
06
40
2
18
0
19
39
37
2
19
0
17
38
37
2
18
0
14
34
37
3
17
0
12
32
37
3
16
0
10
29
37
6
15
0
8
29
37
7
16
0
7
30
37
7
17
0
7
31
37
N05
HH
MM
■
■
■
■
SCHDU
PLAN
PLN-E
IN-FL
TOTAL
CAPA
03
50
04
00
04
10
04
20
04
30
04
40
04
50
05
00
05
10
05
20
05
30
05
40
05
50
06
00
06
10
06
20
06
30
06
40
0
0
0
28
28
37
0
1
0
28
29
37
0
1
0
28
29
37
0
3
0
27
30
37
0
5
0
27
32
37
0
10
0
26
36
37
o
13
0
24
37
37
1
15
0
22
38
37
1
17
0
21
39
37
1
20
0
19
40
37
2
18
0
19
39
37
2
19
0
17
38
37
2
18
0
14
34
37
3
17
0
12
32
37
3
16
0
10
29
37
6
15
0
8
29
37
7
16
0
7
30
37
7
17
0
7
31
37
HH
MM
Flow Control
Flow Control
Capacity
Constraints
03
50
S04
NORTH AREA
EAST AREA
WEST AREA
SOUTH AREA
30
20
10
SCHDU
PLAN
PLN-E
IN-FL
TOTAL
CAPA
PLAN
PLN-E
IN-FL
TOTAL
*** ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GRPH (SECTOR) ***
AREA : T27
TIME : 0350-0640
50
40
■
■
■
■
SCHDU
ACCs in JAPAN
Excessiv
e Holding
AOs
Capacity
Constraints
Delay for
Departur
e
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
22
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
For the future Multi-nodal Flow Management
Cross Border ATFM needs,
Reason of
constrains
How long
does it
continue?
Advanced Information
exchange among
ANSPs
How much
does it affect
on air traffic?
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
23
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Sub-Regional ATFM Coordination
in APAC
NARAHG
Multi-Nodal
Sub-Regional ATFM
Regional ATFM
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
24
Civil Aviation Bureau Japan
Thank you
Cross-Border ATFM Workshop / 3rd - 4th September 2015 New Delhi, India
25