MATH10242 SUMMARY Sequences The Triangle Inequality For all x and y, we have |x + y| ≤ |x| + |y| Convergence A sequence (an )n∈N converges to l if: ∀ > 0, ∃N ∈ N such that |an − l| < holds for all n ∈ N with n ≥ N So, even when is really small, you can still find N ∈ N such that all the terms after the N th term of the sequence have a difference with the limit l that is less than A sequence can converge to at most one limit Cauchy Sequence A sequence (an )n∈N is a Cauchy sequence if ∀ > 0, ∃N ∈ N such that |ai − aj | < holds for all i, j ∈ N with i, j ≥ N So terms of a Cauchy sequence are getting closer and closer A sequence converges ⇔ it is a Cauchy sequence Bounded A sequence (an )n∈N is bounded if ∃M ∈ R+ , ∀n ∈ N, |an | ≤ M So all the terms of the sequence are greater than −M and less than M A sequence (an )n∈N is convergent ⇒ (an )n∈N is bounded. Monotone Convergence Theorem If a sequence (an )n∈N is both increasing and bounded, then (an )n∈N is convergent 1 The Sandwich Rule If sequences (an )n∈N and (bn )n∈N both converge to l ∈ R and we have sequence (cn )n∈N such that for large n, (an )n∈N ≤ (cn )n∈N ≤ (bn )n∈N then cn → l as n → ∞ The Algebra of Limits Let sequences (an )n∈N and (bn )n∈N converge to real numbers a and b respectively, then (modulus) limn→∞ |an | = |a| (scalar multiplication) for any k ∈ R, limn→∞ kan = ka (addition) limn→∞ (an + bn ) = a + b (multiplication) limn→∞ (an · bn ) = a· b (division) if bn 6= 0 (for all n and b 6= 0, then a an = limn→∞ bn b (Reciprocal) if bn 6= 0 (for all n and b 6= 0, then 1 1 limn→∞ = bn b Divergence A sequence (an )n∈N is divergent if it is not convergent, so there is no l ∈ R such that an → l as n → ∞ an example of a divergent sequence is ((−1)n )n∈N note that a sequence can be divergent even if it is bounded Tends To Infinity We say a sequence (an )n∈N tends to ∞ as n → ∞ if ∀K ∈ R> , ∃N ∈ N such that an > K ∀n ≥ N The Reciprocal Rule Let (an )n∈N be a sequence of non-zero real numbers, then: (1) an → ∞ as n → ∞ ⇒ (2) an > 0 for large n and 1 an is null ⇒ 1 → 0 as n → ∞ an an → ∞ as n → ∞ n∈N A sequence is null if it converges to 0 If (an )n∈N and (bn )n∈N both tend to infinity, then (1) an + bn → ∞ as n → ∞ (2) for c > 0, c· an → ∞ as n → ∞ (3) an · bn → ∞ as n → ∞ 2 Infinity Sandwich Rule If (bn )n∈N → ∞ as n → ∞ and (an )n∈N is any sequence such that for all large n, an ≥ b n then an → ∞ as n → ∞ Subsequences For any subsequence (akn )n∈N of the sequence (an )n∈N : (1) an → l as n → ∞ ⇒ akn → l as n → ∞ (2) an → ∞ as n → ∞ ⇒ akn → ∞ as n → ∞ (3) an → −∞ as n → ∞ ⇒ akn → −∞ as n → ∞ Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem (1817) Every bounded sequence (an ) has a convergent subsequence L’Hˆ opital’s Rule Given the Conditions: (1) f : [1, ∞) → R and g : [1, ∞) → R are two functions and can be differentiated at least twice (2) for some N > 0, g(x) > 0 for x > N (3) (an )n∈N and (bn )n∈N are sequences such that (an ) = f (n) and (bn ) = g(n) for n ∈ N (4) n→∞ lim an = n→∞ lim bn = ∞ Then we have lim n→∞ f 0 (n) an = n→∞ lim 0 bn g (n) Series Given the sequence of partial sums (sn )n∈N such that s n = a1 + a2 + · · · + an = n X ai i=1 If sn → s as n → ∞, then ∞ P an is convergent with sum s. n=1 If there is no s ∈ R with this property, then ∞ P n=1 ∞ P n=1 an is divergent. an is a convergent series ⇒ (an )n∈N is a null sequence. The Algebra of Infinite Sums Let series ∞ P n=1 an and ∞ P n=1 bn be convergent with sums A and B respectively, then (addition) ∞ P (an + bn ) is also convergent with sum A + B n=1 (scalar multiplication) for any λ ∈ R, 3 ∞ P n=1 λan is convergent with sum λA Series With Non-negative Terms Let sn = n P i=1 ai such that an ≥ 0 for all n ∈ N, then the series ∞ X an is convergent ⇔ the sequence (sn )n∈N is bounded above n=1 Each ai is non-negative, so sn = n P ai is increasing and hence the sequence i=1 (sn )n∈N is increasing. This is similar to the Monotone Convergence Theorem. The Comparison Test (improved) Given series ∞ P n=1 an and N > 0), then ∞ P n=1 ∞ X bn such that 0 ≤ an ≤ bn for all n > N (for some bn converges ⇒ n=1 ∞ X an converges, n=1 ∞ X an diverges ⇒ n=1 ∞ X bn diverges n=1 The original comparison test requires condition such that 0 ≤ an ≤ bn for all n ∈ N, but since infinite sums have the (very important!) property that ∞ X an is convergent ⇔ n=1 X an is convergent for some positive N ∈ N n≥N so the improved comparison test works. This property can be applied in conjunction with other tests for series convergence. The Ratio Test For Series an+1 → l as n → ∞ an Let an > 0 for all N ∈ N and assume (1) l < 1 ⇒ (2) l > 1 ⇒ ∞ P = an is convergent n=1 ∞ P = an is divergent n=1 However, no conclusion can be drawn if l = 1 The Integral Test Let f : [1, ∞) → R be a function that is positive (f (x) ≥ 0 ∀x ≥ 0), decreasing (f (x) ≥ f (y) ∀x ≥ y ∈ R) and continuous, then the series ∞ X f (n) converges ⇔ n=1 Z n 1 n∈N f (x)dx 1 converges as n → ∞ ⇔ f (x)dx the sequence Z n is bounded (monotone convergence theorem) n∈N 4 Series With Positive And Negative Terms The Alternating Series Test If (an )n∈N is a decreasing null sequence with positive terms, then the series ∞ X (−1)n+1 an is convergent. n=1 I think for (an )n∈N to be null and positive implies that it is also decreasing after the N th term for some positive integer N (that’s if it’s not decreasing from the beginning). Absolute Convergence A series If ∞ P n=1 ∞ P n=1 an is absolutely convergent if ∞ P n=1 |an | is convergent. an is convergent but not absolutely convergent, then it is conditionally convergent ∞ X |an | is convergent ⇒ ∞ X an is convergent n=1 n=1 THIS IS A SUMMARY OF MATH10242 UPTO WEEK 10, ITS PURPOSE IS ONLY TO JOG YOUR MEMORY. PLEASE READ THE PROPER NOTES WHEN REVISING. 5
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc