Keratoconus Treatment Update

Keratoconus Treatment
Update
Dr Ian Chan
Hollywood Medical Centre
Nedlands
T 93881828
F 93881868
E [email protected]
o
1 in 2000 (1in 400)
o
Affects mainly young people
o
Disease is progressive until around 45 years of
age
o
Significant impact on a patient’s productivity even
with moderate disease
o
Severe disease can cause disability
Keratoconus Treatment Options
Vision
•
Stabilisation
Spectacles
•
Rigid Contact Lenses
•
Intracorneal Ring Segments
•
Topographic Guided Laser
Keratectomy
•
Implantable Contact Lens
•
Corneal Transplant
•
Collagen Cross-linking
•
Corneal Transplant
Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL)
o
o
o
o
o
Industrial collagen cross-linking can improve material
strength
KC stop progressing with age
Riboflavin excited by UV to product oxygen radicals
covalent cross-linking bonds
In-vitro experiments in 1997
• 300% increase in rigidity
Human trial in 2003
CXL clinical experimental results
•
over 10 years experience
•
over 300 papers on case series
•
3 randomised controlled trials
•
•
Largest and longest duration RCT from REEVH
•
94 patients for 3 years
up to 6 years of followup data
CXL clinical experimental results
•
Overall:
•
Stop KC progression long term in 95% of
patients
•
Around 1 diopter of reduction in
Keratometry
•
Around 1 line of gain in UCVA and BSCVA
Personal CXL clinical results
•
315 cases
•
Only 1 case required retreatment
•
1 case progressed to corneal transplantation
•
1.6 diopter of reduction in Keratometry
•
Around 1.5 line of gain in BSCVA
•
1 case of scarring
•
No keratitis
Standard CXL Protocol
•
7 to 9 mm diameter of epithelium detachment
•
5 to 30 minutes of 0.1% riboflavin isotonic solution
•
30 minutes of 370nm UVA at 3mW/cm2
•
Bandage Contact Lens
•
Antibiotic and Steroid drops
Typical CXL experience
•
Some discomfort in first 3 days
•
Reduction in vision for 1-2 weeks
•
Reduction in contrast for 1 to 2 months
•
Complication rate is very low
•
Some improvement in vision is noted either early or later
•
Improvement is still possible up to 3 years later
New trends in CXL treatment
•
Higher Fluence CXL
•
•
Epithelium-On Treatment
•
•
Reduction in recovery time and complications
Hypotonic Riboflavin Solution
•
•
Reduction in treatment time
Enable treatment for thinner corneas
Combined with laser keratectomy and implantable ring
segment
•
Improve visual outcome
CXL summary
•
It does work
•
Stabilise disease in majority of Patients
•
Minimal risk
•
Mild improvement of disease
•
Early Diagnosis is now important
Intra-Corneal Ring Segments (ICRS)
Implantable Corneal Ring Segments (ICRS)
•
Kerarings, Ferrara Rings, INTACS
•
Over 10 years of experience
•
Numerous papers published
•
Average effect
•
•
3 diopter of flattening
•
1.5 diopter of astigmatism reduction
•
3 lines of UCVA improvement
•
3 lines of BSCVA improvement
•
up to 5% can lose BSCVA
Adverse effects - glare, keratitis, extruded segments, doesn’t stop disease progression
ICRS
•
Also proven to be effective
•
Improves vision in some patients
•
Reversible
•
Most patients still require spectacles
•
Does not stop progression
Topographic Guided PTK
Topographic Guided Laser Keratectomy
•
Custom ablation of the cornea based on topographic
data
•
Always performed together with CXL in Keratoconus
•
Less than 50 micron ablation
•
Long Term results after 36 months of 231 eyes shows
no disease progression and cornea continues to flatten
•
The thinnest cornea was just over 300 micron before treatment
195 after treatment!!
Topographic Guided Laser Keratectomy
•
•
Overall results:
•
over 3 lines gain in UCVA
•
2 lines gain in BSCVA
Adverse effects: longer recovery,
scarring
Topographic Guided PTK
•
So far appears to be effective and safe
•
Caution required
•
Most patients still require spectacles
•
Compared to ICRS
•
Disadvantage: Irreversible, limited by corneal
thickness
•
Advantage: Both vision improvement and
stabilisation treatments all done on the same day.
Corneal Transplant
Corneal Transplantation
•
One of the most successful form of tissue transplantation
•
The majority of patients can reach driving level vision
•
Disadvantages are
•
•
Long recovery - up to 3 year to reach stability
•
May need another graft in a lifetime
•
Risk of rejection always present
Newer forms of keratoplasty lowers the rejection and failure
risk
Summary
•
None of these treatments can perfectly reverse Keratoconus
•
Early diagnosis is very important - we can now stop it
•
Every keratoconus patient is different - important to customise treatment to address their
vision and stabilise disease
•
RGP is still the quickest and most effective way to improve vision
•
ICRS and Topographic PTK is a good option for improving vision in CL intolerant patients
•
Disease stabilisation is paramount - CXL does work and it is evolving
•
Corneal transplant is still a great option when all else fails
Case Topo PTK and ICRS for KC
•
41 yo female
•
Long standing Keratoconus and high myopia
•
Unable to tolerate RGP any more after many years of lens wear
•
BSCVA R 6/12- L 6/24
•
R Ferrara Ring
•
improved R to 6/9 with -18 soft contact
•
Glare and reflections at night
Case Topo PTK and ICRS for
KC
•
L Topographic guided PTK
•
With -18 SCL
•
R 6/9-2 L 6/9
•
No Glare from LE
•
Day time contrast slightly better with RE
•
? ICL next