Proximal Realignment - Orthopaedic Summit 2014

Proximal Soft tissue Realignment
Darren L. Johnson, MD
Professor and Chief: Orthopaedic Surgery
Medical Director of Sports Medicine
University of Kentucky School of Medicine
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
• Consultant: smith nephew endoscopy
• Institutional support: Research/Education
– Smith-Nephew Endoscopy
– DJO Orthopaedics
2
Patellofemoral Joint
•
•
Over 100 techniques have
been described to manage
patella disorders
Divided into bony
procedure, soft tissue
procedure, or combination
Soft Tissue Balancing of the Patella
Increased TT-TG:
Definition:
• Tibial tubercle-trochlear
groove distance
Radiographic equivalent to the Q-Angle
– Normal: 10-15mm
– Abnormal :>20
• 56% of patients with patella
dislocation have a TT-TG >20
(Dejour H et al.KSSTA 1994)
• No clear correlation of TTTG
to instability (OR 1.1-1.3)
(Balcarek et al. KSSTA 2013)
Underlying PF instability / malalignment
• Lateral maltracking due to :
– Increased TT-TG
– Insufficiency of MPFL
– Increased Distal femoral rotation
– Patella Alta
– Trochlea Dysplasia
Insall’s Proximal
Realignment Procedure
•
•
Medializes and distalizes the femoral extensors
proximal to the patella
“Less demanding and less invasive”
Operative Morbidity Open
• Pain: Patient is Worse
• Prolonged rehab
– VMO Atrophy
• Recurrent Instability
– Medial????
• Stiffness: Really Bad!!!
Historic Results of
Proximal Realignment
Author
Year
Diagnosis
% Satisfactory
Result
Insall et al
1983
Pain and
subluxation
91
1988
Subluxation and
dislocation
81
Abraham et al
1989
Pain and
dislocation
62
Aglietti et al
1989
Dislocation
91
Scuderi et al
Treatment: Soft tissue Operative
• Arthroscopic: Technique dependant!!!!!!!
– Lateral retinacular release: Not in Isolation!!!
– Medial capsular repair/plication +/- LRR
– Medial patellofemoral ligament repair +/- LRR
– Loose body removal/ repair
Treatment: Arthroscopic
• Benefits:Not for Bony Pathology: RARE CASE
– Prevent recurrence & limit morbidity
– Direct visualization
– Real time evaluation of tracking
– Recreate more normal anatomy/biomechanics
Case Study
•
•
•
•
15 y.o. wrestler
Acute patellar dislocation
No h/o patellar instability
Exam
– Osseous Factors Okay
– Large effusion
– +Apprehension
– Ligaments stable
OSSEOUS EVAL
Medial Patella
MPFL Avulsion
MPFL Repair
Case Study
•
•
•
•
15 y.o FB player
Acute patellar dislocation
No h/o instability
Exam
– Osseous Normal
– Large effusion
– Limited ROM
– Ligaments stable
MRI EVAL
Retinacular/MPFL Tear
Retinacular/MPFL Repair
Case Study
•
•
•
•
14 yo female:elite soccer
Acute patellar dislocation
No h/o patellar instability
Exam
– Increased Q angle
– Large effusion
– + Apprehension
– Pronated feet
•
•
•
•
•
•
Conclusions
Chondral lesions; Watch Out/Long term
Associated Ligament Injury: ACL/MCL
Patient Evaluation of RISK: MRI/CT Scan
Restore normal anatomy surgically
Avoid “To Tight” Repair
Instability is better than PAIN