Fairmont WTP (Kosmatka)

6/24/2014
HIGHEST PRIORITIES:
No More Taste & Odor Complaints
Implementing Strategies to Address
Algal Toxins for the City of Fairmont, MN
PRESENTATION BY:
Troy Nemmers, PE
Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
Jason Kosmatka, PE
AE2S Project Manager
CONFERENCE:
2014 Surface Water Treatment Workshop
Fargo, ND
Presentation Topics
• Planning
– How did we get to where we are now?
•
•
•
•
T&O Pil t St d
T&O Pilot Study
Construction
Start‐up
Results
1
6/24/2014
FAIRMONT WTP
Connections
• 4,079 Residential
• 500 Commercial
• 16 Industrial
Population
• 10,500 residents Capacity
• Built in 1926
• 1961 Expansion ‐
4.5 MGD 1961 E
i
4 5 MGD
• New WTP ‐ 5.4 MGD
Treatment
• Class A Lime Softening with Filtration
FACILITY PLANNING
Source Water Evaluation
Existing Water Source  Budd Lake
Sufficient Quantity
Q
y
Adequate Quality
Taste and Odor Mitigation
g
Alternative Water Source  Groundwater
Sufficient Quantity
Hardness Removal Requirements (804 mg/l)
TDS (1080 mg/l)
Sulfate (573 mg/l)
Sulfate (573 mg/l)
Gross Alpha (25.1 pCi/l)
Cost to Develop
Budd Lake selected…
2
6/24/2014
FACILITY PLANNING
Treatment Target Goals
Budd Lake Surface Water Treatment
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Algae Removal
Softening Turbidity Control
Pathogen Removal and/or Inactivation
TOC Removal
Disinfection
Emerging Contaminants (ECDs, PCPs, PhACs)
Multi‐Barrier Treatment Approach
Taste and Odor Control
FACILITY PLANNING
Taste and Odor Control
Blue‐green algae blooms = cyanobacteria
Cyanobacteria cells die/burst and release…
/
 Taste and odor constituents
Cellular
Constituents
• Geosmin and 2‐methylisoborneol (MIB)
• Aesthetic quality issue
• Not regulated
MIB
geosmin
microcystin
other cyanotoxins
 Cyanotoxins
• Mi
Microcystin and cylindrospermopsin
i
d li d
i
• Health hazard  studies link to illness,
cancer
• Currently unregulated
• On EPA Contaminant Candidate List
Extra-Cellular
Extra Cellular
Constituents
MIB
cell
lysis
geosmin
released
microcystin
other cyanotoxin
3
6/24/2014
FACILITY PLANNING
Taste and Odor Control
Budd Lake blue‐green algae blooms
g
 Geosmin
• Earthy odor
• Early spring
 MIB
•
•
•
•
Musty odor
10 ng/l threshold
Late summer to early fall
Late summer to early fall
Less prevalent than geosmin
 Cyanotoxin
June T&O event on Budd Lake…
Geosmin
nanograms/liter (ng/l)
Recommended Threshold
30 ng/l
Lake Surface
~16,000 ng/l
Intake Level (16-20 ft deep)
~70-80 ng/l
Microcystin
micrograms/liter (µg/l)
P t ti l Regulated
Potential
R
l t d Threshold
Th h ld Level
L
l
0 1 – 1 µg/l
0.1
/l
Lake Surface
~160 µg/l
Intake Level (16-20 ft deep)
~0.5 µg/l
• Most prevalent species –
Microcystin
Budd Lake
New Conventional Softening & Filtration
Softening & Filtration Water Treatment Plant…
Onsite verification of T&O control
technologies required prior to
finalization of preferred WTP concept
Algae
Removal
Dissolved Air Flotation??
Softening
Conventional Softening and Recarbonation
Filtration
Conventional
Filtration
Taste & Odor
Control
???
Residual
Disinfection
Chlorine
Clearwell
High Service Pumps
4
6/24/2014
TASTE AND ODOR PILOT STUDY
Treatment Technologies
Treatment Technology
T&O Removal Efficiency
Cyanotoxin Removal Efficiency
Piloted?
Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF)


(cellular)
Yes
Membranes


(extra‐cellular)
No, membranes eliminated from consideration
Ozone


(extra‐cellular)
Yes
UV with Hydrogen Peroxide (UV/H2O2)


(extra‐cellular)
Yes
Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) Adsorption


(extra‐cellular)
Yes
APPLICATION OF STUDY RESULTS
Best performing technology = GAC with KMnO4
 MIB/geosmin removal
 Cyanotoxin (microcystin) removal
 Multi‐barrier treatment for cyanotoxin removal
 Supported by Odor Panel preference
Results indicate presence of cell bound T&O
Results indicate presence of cell‐bound T&O
 Future WTP should focus on removal of cells in‐tact where possible. Technologies include:
• Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF), or
• Co‐precipitate with lime solids
5
6/24/2014
FUTURE WTP
Budd Lake
Treatment Train Selection
Softening &
Algae Removal
Chemical Feeds









Flocculant
l
l
Coagulant
Lime
Soda Ash
Phosphate
Filter aid
Sodium Permanganate
Chlorine
Ammonia
Filtration
Conventional Softening and Recarbonation
Conventional
Filtration
Cyanotoxin
Oxidation
NaMnO4
Taste & Odor
Control
GAC/BAC
Residual
Disinfection
Chlorine
Clearwell
High Service Pumps
SCIENCE BEHIND
TREATMENT DESIGN
STEP 1
STEP 2
Settle out as Settle out as
much algae as possible
Filter out algae Filter out algae
carried over from SCB
 Polymer is our friend (when required)!!!!
 Found Polyacrylamide
Found Polyacrylamide
worked best w/ algae  Algae is very difficult to filter (~5um)
STEP 3
CHOP!
 Lyse any algae that went through filters
 Use an oxidant to b t ll ll
burst cell wall
 Cyanotoxins are now more readily assimible as AOC for biological growth
6
6/24/2014
FAIRMONT WTP
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Excavation
7
6/24/2014
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Subgrade Level
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Subgrade Level
8
6/24/2014
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Gallery Level
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Gallery Level
9
6/24/2014
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Operations Level
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Operations Level
10
6/24/2014
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Intake Pipe Screen
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Intake Pipe Screen
11
6/24/2014
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Intake Pipe Screen
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Filters
12
6/24/2014
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Filters
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Equipment
13
6/24/2014
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Equipment
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Equipment
14
6/24/2014
MISCELLANEOUS
STATISTICS
• Started in August 2011, g
Substantially complete in Sept. 2013
• Demo of old WTP ongoing
• Final Completion July 2014
• 8,500 c.y. of cast‐in‐place concrete
• 800 tons of rebar
• Motion sensing lights
• Solar tubes
15
6/24/2014
STARTUP
Lessons Learned
• No need for seeding
• Be mindful of water quality in Reclaim Basin
– Dead algae
• Conversion of GAC to BAC is Synergistic
• Avg. 20‐30 complaints per year with old WTP
– One complaint so far
STARTUP
Algae Bloom
– St
Startup began in mid‐August t b
i
id A
t
2013
– Severe Algae bloom in early September
– Overwhelmed Clarifier
– Jar Tested Polymers
• AF 4355 EHW (polyacrylamide)
– Alge counters available!!
counters available!!
Raw Water Ammonia Spike!
– Large rain event
– 0.2 mg NH3/l to 0.7 mg/l
– Had to totally adjust disinfection strategy
16
6/24/2014
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Fairmont Surface Water Plant TOC Removal Results
90
80
% TOC removed before biological filters went online
% TOC removed after biological filters went online
% TOC removal required
70
% TOC Removed
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Month‐Year
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Trihalomethane (THM) Results
Cedar Park Rd ‐ Cedar Park Hwy 15 & I90 ‐ Holiday Inn 2555 Lake Avenue ‐ Kenway Engineering
Food & Fuel
1025 Bixby Rd ‐Tank Farm
1400 E. 8th St ‐ Cloverleaf Refrigeratio
MCL
140
Conccentration µg/L
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1/17/2012
4/25/2012
7/12/2012
10/30/2012
3/11/2013
6/10/2013
9/10/2013
12/10/2013
3/5/2014
Time
17
6/24/2014
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Haloacetic (HAA5) Results
Cedar Park Rd ‐ Cedar Park Hwy 15 & I90 ‐ Holiday Inn 2555 Lake Avenue ‐ Kenway Engineering
Food & Fuel
Food & Fuel
1025 Bixby Rd ‐Tank
1025 Bixby Rd Tank Farm
Farm
1400 E. 8th St ‐ Cloverleaf Refrigeratio
1400 E. 8th St Cloverleaf Refrigeratio
MCL
70
60
Concentration µg/L
50
40
30
20
10
0
1/17/2012
4/25/2012
7/12/2012
10/30/2012
3/11/2013
6/10/2013
9/10/2013
12/10/2013
3/5/2014
Time
THE FUTURE
OF BIOFILTRATION
Epiphany in Water Treatment Don’tt Kill It! Feed them, Don
Kill It! Feed them,
and they will grow!!
 If the food is there, the biology will grow
 May have to augment food:
 Phosphate, ethanol, DO
 Europe has decades of experience
Treatment Candidates:
 Algal Toxins (MIB, Geosmin, Microcystin)
 Iron
 Manganese
Treatment Candidates:
 Raw Water Ammonia
 ~ 2.0 mg/l with Aeration
•Takes 4.57 mg O2 for each mg
of NH4+
• Max DO is about 10.5 mg/l
 ~ 4.0 mg/l with continuous aeration
• Ammonia contactor
• Study done by Dr. Darren Lytle, EPA
 Bromate
Perchlorate
Ozone quenching
 VOCs
 Pesticides, MTBE
 Hexavalent Chromium
18
6/24/2014
THE FUTURE
OF BIOFILTRATION
Considerations:
 DO
 EBCT
 Food (100C : 10N : 1P)
 Biofilm (EPS) control
 Disinfection Strategy  Ammonia Analyzer
 Algae Probes (ATP)
 Filters in Series
Benefits:
 Chemical Savings $$
 Biologically Neutral Water
 Green/Sustainable
It’s Happening
More than We Know!
 Regional Utility
 Raw Ammonia: 1.6 mg/l
 Feed 3.8 mg Cl2/l
 2.4 : 1 ratio
2.4 : 1 ratio
 Free Chlorine: 1.35 mg/l
 Tot. Chlorine: 1.80 mg/l
THANK YOU!
Questions?
Q ti ?
Jason Kosmatka, Project Manager
[email protected]
19