THE TOP 500 DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK APRIL 21/28, 2014 m enr.com Firms wish the recovery would accelerate Water Supply includes dams, reservoirs, transmission pipelines, distribution mains, irrigation canals, desalination and potability treatment plants, pumping stations, etc. TE M WA S ECO TEL TRO OUS ARD HAZ LEU NSP TRA / PE US. IND LY UPP WA S ER / SEW ER S TE G RIN ER O RT ATIO N G ILDIN CTU POW 2013 REVENUE $ MIL. TOTAL INT’L UFA FIRM TYPE M Power comprises thermal and hydroelectric powerplants, waste-toenergy plants, transmission lines, substations, cogeneration plants, etc. The Top 500 Design Firms RANK 2014 2013 FIRM Telecommunications comprises transmission lines and cabling, towers and antennae, data centers, etc. Transportation includes airports, bridges, roads, canals, locks, dredging, marine facilities, piers, railroads, tunnels, etc. L BU Hazardous Waste includes chemical and nuclear waste treatment, Sewerage / Solid Waste includes sanitary and storm sewers, treatment plants, pumping plants, incinerators, industrial waste facilities, etc. Petroleum includes refineries, petrochemical plants, offshore facilities, pipelines, etc. MAN General Building as a category includes commercial buildings, offices, stores, educational facilities, government buildings, hospitals, medical facilities, hotels, apartments, housing, etc. Manufacturing includes auto, electronic assembly, textile plants, etc. ERA outside of the U.S., see www.enr.com. **Firms not ranked last year. Some markets may not add up to 100% due to omission of “other” miscellaneous market category and rounding. NA-Not available. Industrial Process comprises pulp and paper mills, steel mills, nonferrous metal refineries, pharmaceutical plants, chemical plants, food and other processing plants, etc. GEN Companies are ranked according to revenue for design services performed in 2013 in $ millions (*). Those with subsidiaries are indicated by (†). For information on subsidiaries and where each firm worked asbestos and lead abatement, etc. WAT How to Read the Tables KEY TO TYPE OF FIRM A architect, E engineer, EC engineercontractor, AE architect-engineer, EA engineer-architect, ENV environmental, GE geotechnical engineer, L landscape architect, P planner and O other. Other combinations are possible. Firms classified themselves. AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. ranked at No. 1 on the ENR Top 500 Design Firms list for the fifth consecutive year. #01 THE TOP 500 DESIGN FIRMS 1 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif. EA 7,240.93,323.9 40 2 3 JACOBS, Pasadena, Calif. AEC 6,820.23,691.2 12 55 2143 3 2 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif. † EAC 5,270.01,358.4 11 26 631934 4 4 FLUOR CORP., Irving, Texas † EC 4,505.93,522.0 1 22 0076 5 5 CH2M HILL, Englewood, Colo. † EC 3,585.31,640.3 4 4 4 1514143015 1 0 109402970 1551 170 040 The Top Design Firms in Transportation TRANSPORTATION RANK FIRM HIGHWAYS $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2,102.2 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 808.6 2 URS CORP. 1,806.7 2 URS CORP. 665.9 3 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF 1,132.2 3 CH2M HILL 537.7 4 CH2M HILL 1,066.7 4 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF 476.6 5JACOBS 1,017.9 5 HNTB COS. 383.5 MASS TRANSIT AND RAIL RANK FIRM AIRPORTS $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 615.3 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 299.6 2JACOBS 550.4 2 URS CORP. 230.7 3 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF 489.6 3 LOUIS BERGER 75.0 4 URS CORP. 440.0 4 CH2M HILL 54.4 5PARSONS 264.3 5 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF 54.1 MARINE AND PORT FACILITIES RANK FIRM BRIDGES $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 135.6 1 URS CORP. 405.5 2 MOFFATT & NICHOL 112.5 2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 243.2 3 CH2M HILL 103.5 3 HNTB COS. 148.1 4 URS CORP. 64.6 4HDR 132.7 5 TETRA TECH INC. 57.0 5 CH2M HILL 113.3 *BASED ON 2013 DESIGN REVENUE FROM TRANSPORTATION AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS. 2 ENR SOURCEBOOK July 21, 2014 enr.com The Top Design Firms in Environment TRANSMISSION LINES AND AQUEDUCTS DAMS & RESERVOIRS $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 243.6 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 176.7 2 BLACK & VEATCH 124.0 2 URS CORP. 166.5 3 MWH GLOBAL 87.7 3 TETRA TECH INC. 119.0 4 URS CORP. 68.4 4HDR 67.1 5HDR 41.7 5 ARCADIS U.S./RTKL 47.0 WATER SUPPLY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE 1 TETRA TECH INC. 667.0 1 CH2M HILL 362.0 2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 624.5 2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 211.0 3 CH2M HILL 538.5 3 MWH GLOBAL 208.2 4 MWH GLOBAL 367.7 4 ARCADIS U.S./RTKL 117.0 5 URS CORP. 292.6 5 CDM SMITH 112.7 SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS CHEMICAL AND SOIL REMEDIATION $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE 1 MWH GLOBAL 167.9 1 URS CORP. 570.1 2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 112.7 2 ARCADIS U.S./RTKL 498.0 3 CH2M HILL 101.2 3 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 356.5 4PARSONS 99.9 4PARSONS 193.4 5 URS CORP. 63.4 5 TETRA TECH INC. 156.0 SEWERAGE AND SOLID WASTE HAZARDOUS WASTE $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM 1 CH2M HILL 509.7 1 URS CORP. 888.2 2 MWH GLOBAL 369.9 2 ARCADIS U.S./RTKL 831.0 3 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 323.7 3 CH2M HILL 555.2 4 CDM SMITH 195.5 4 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 536.1 5 TETRA TECH INC. 182.0 5 TETRA TECH INC. 491.0 WATER TREATMENT, DESALINATION PLANTS RANK FIRM SITE ASSESSMENT AND COMPLIANCE $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE 1 TETRA TECH INC. 548.0 1 CH2M HILL 425.5 2 CH2M HILL 506.4 2 ARCADIS U.S./RTKL 293.0 3 MWH GLOBAL 256.2 3 TETRA TECH INC. 266.0 4 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 204.3 4 URS CORP. 257.0 5 CDM SMITH 152.5 5 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 154.9 *BASED ON 2013 DESIGN REVENUE FROM ENVIRONMENT AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS TOP 25 U.S. ARCHITECTURE FIRMS OF 2014 Companies are ranked by revenue (in millions of dollars) for architectural services performed in 2013. These data also appear in Engineering News-Record’s “Top 500 Design Firms” list, which, unlike our ranking, also includes firms that do engineering exclusively. RANK 2014 2013 FIRM, U.S. HEADQUARTERS TYPE OF FIRM TOTAL ARCHITECTURAL REVENUE 1 1 Gensler, San Francisco A 883.22 2 3 CH2M HILL/IDC Architects, Englewood, CO EC 485.37 3 2 AECOM, Los Angeles EA 446.75 4 4 Jacobs, Pasadena, CA AEC 430.67 5 5 Perkins+Will, Chicago A 356.36 Key to firm types A Architect EAL Engineer Architect Landscape AE Architect Engineer AECArchitect Engineer Contractor AP Architect Planner (not all combinations listed) See the entire Top 300 Architecture Firms list at architecturalrecord.com/news. enr.com July 21, 2014 ENR SOURCEBOOK 3 The Top Design Firms in General Building GENERAL BUILDING COMMERCIAL OFFICES $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2,907.9 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2JACOBS 823.4 2GENSLER 408.1 3GENSLER 815.9 3HOK 144.5 4 URS CORP. 583.2 4PERKINS+WILL 101.2 5HDR 388.5 5JACOBS GOVERNMENT OFFICES 81.5 HEALTH CARE $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM 1,004.9 $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 623.3 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 317.4 2JACOBS 354.3 2HDR 192.0 3 URS CORP. 177.2 3 URS CORP. 182.9 4HDR 116.5 4PERKINS+WILL 121.4 5 CH2M HILL 75.4 5 HKS INC. 116.1 MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL EDUCATION $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 235.8 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 35.4 2 URS CORP. 96.4 3 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF 32.0 3PERKINS+WILL 75.0 4 URS CORP. 25.9 4GENSLER 74.1 5 WSP USA 25.2 5 CANNON DESIGN 73.0 HOTELS, MOTELS & CONVENTION CENTERS RANK FIRM 218.4 SPORTS $ MIL. REVENUE $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 190.3 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2GENSLER 76.6 2POPULOUS 57.8 3 WATG / WIMBERLY INTERIORS 68.7 3 HKS INC. 33.2 4 HKS INC. 43.0 4 HEERY INTERNATIONAL INC. 28.0 5 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF 21.1 5 THORNTON TOMASETTI INC. 21.7 CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES RETAIL $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM 139.1 $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 50.0 1JACOBS 156.5 2HOK 32.0 2PARSONS 149.8 3 DLR GROUP 20.0 3 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 141.5 4HDR 16.0 4 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 128.7 5 HUNT COS. INC. 14.2 5 GENSLER 109.3 *BASED ON 2013 DESIGN REVENUE FROM GENERAL BUILDING AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS The Top 50 Program Management Firms Construction Management-for-Fee/PM Firms 2013 REVENUE IN $ MIL. 2013 REVENUE IN $ MIL. RANK 2014 RANK 2014 2013 FIRM TOTAL REV. INT'L TYPE ($ MIL.) REVENUE DOMESTIC REVENUE INT’L REVENUE TOTAL REVENUE 1 CH2M HILL, Englewood, Colo. 1,763.7 527.7 2,291.5 6 7 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif. EA 912.6 418.9 2 BECHTEL, San Francisco, Calif. 1,313.0 5.0 1,318.0 7 5 JONES LANG LASALLE, Chicago, Ill. CM 848.9 429.2 3 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif. FIRM FIRM 1,251.9 51.7 1,303.6 8 8 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF, New York, N.Y. EA 713.7 211.2 4 JACOBS, Pasadena, Calif. 555.2 654.9 1,210.1 9 9 HILL INTERNATIONAL, Marlton, N.J. CM 576.7 408.7 5 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif. 493.7 418.9 912.6 10 EAC 516.7 0.0 10 LEIDOS, Reston, Va. enr.com July 21, 2014 ENR SOURCEBOOK 4 The Top Design Firms in Power HYDRO PLANTS CO-GENERATION $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 212.8 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 97.8 2 TETRA TECH INC. 139.0 2JACOBS 71.7 3 MWH GLOBAL 119.9 3 URS CORP. 40.6 4HDR 51.6 4 THE BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. 30.3 5 URS CORP. 26.2 5 BURNS & MCDONNELL 25.9 SOLAR POWER POWER $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 29.3 1CB&I 877.9 2BECHTEL 19.0 2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 746.5 3 URS CORP. 16.5 3 BLACK & VEATCH 615.8 4 WORLEYPARSONS GROUP INC. 16.4 4 BURNS & MCDONNELL 578.1 5 FLUOR CORP. 12.8 5 SARGENT & LUNDY LLC 521.7 WIND POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION PLANTS $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM 102.0 1 BURNS & MCDONNELL 272.6 19.9 2 POWER ENGINEERS INC. 239.8 3 STANTEC INC. 7.4 3 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 236.0 4AMEC 6.6 4 BLACK & VEATCH 168.3 5 SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 6.0 5 TRC COS. INC. 135.7 1 TETRA TECH INC. 2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. *BASED ON 2013 DESIGN REVENUE FROM POWER AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS. . KTS ER M BUI LDI NGS T/C ER OTH MEN DEN ESI E RT AIN ENT LTIR MU EL ARE HOT ION CAT LTH C HEA OTH L TIA FICE T OF MEN EDU 1 2 GENSLER, San Francisco, Calif. 1,487 643.60 73 60292911250 2 1 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif. 410 508.77 102331010188 3 3 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif. 625 301.50 4 48 24101170000 4 4 ARUP, New York, N.Y. 210 216.00 83 2025513101637 5 5 HOK, St. Louis, Mo. 750 202.51 50 395732001150 COMMERCIAL OFFICES RANK FIRM GOVERNMENT OFFICES $ MIL. REVENUE RANK ENR SOURCEBOOK $ MIL. REVENUE GENSLER 306.0 1 JACOBS 84.3 2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 115.0 2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 71.9 3 HOK 60.4 3 SKIDMORE OWINGS & MERRILL LLP 48.4 4 ARUP 43.5 4 BLACK & VEATCH 35.1 5 PERKINS+WILL 41.9 5 PAGE 33.2 RANK FIRM 1 RETAIL 5 % OF TOTAL REVENUE ERN / OF FICE IN $ MIL. GOV ACC. STAFF RET AIL 2013 GREEN REVENUE RANK 2014 2013 IVIC Top 5 Green Design Firms by Sector FIRM EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES $ MIL. REVENUE RANK FIRM $ MIL. REVENUE 1 GENSLER 81.9 1 GENSLER 55.6 2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 30.1 2 PERKINS+WILL 45.8 3 HOK 19.0 3 EYP ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING 32.7 4 STANTEC INC. 13.3 4 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 30.3 5 PEI COBB FREED & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS 12.4 5 LPA INC. 21.8 July 21, 2014 enr.com TE WA S ECO M OUS TEL ARD HAZ O RT ATIO N LEU NSP TRO / PE US. IND TRA TE WA S ER / LY UPP ER S WAT ER POW SEW RIN UFA CTU L BU MAN 2013 REVENUE TOTAL INT’L $ MIL. $ MIL. ERA FIRM TYPE GEN RANK 2014 2013 FIRM G ILDIN G THE TOP 150 GLOBAL DESIGN FIRMS M International Design 11 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif., U.S.A. EA 7,240.9 3,323.9 400 10940 2970 24 JACOBS, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A. AEC 6,820.2 3,691.2 125521 43 1551 32 WORLEYPARSONS LTD., North Sydney, NSW, Australia† EC5,535.1 4,558.31 08 108320 0 43 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif., U.S.A.† EAC5,270.0 1,358.411 2 6 6 3193417 0 55 AMEC, Knutsford, Cheshire, U.K.† EC 5,041.0 2,356.542 1311 56440 The Top 10 by Market TRANSPORTATION RANK 2014 2013 Top 10 Revenue: $5,753.7 Mil Sector’s Revenue: $12,232.8 Mil. WATER BUILDING RANK 2014 2013 Top 10 Revenue: $5,555.9 Mil Sector’s Revenue: $11,034.2 Mil. RANK 2014 2013 POWER Top 10 Revenue: $2,034.1 Mil. Sector’s Revenue: $3,682.6 Mil RANK 2014 2013 Top 10 Revenue: $2,901.4 Mil Sector’s Revenue: $6,841.6 Mil SEWER / WASTE RANK 2014 2013 Top 10 Revenue: $1,166.7 Mil. Sector’s Revenue: $2,000.0 Mil. 1 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 1 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 1 1 ARCADIS NV 1 ** HYDROCHINA CORP. 1 1 MWH GLOBAL 2 2 DAR AL-HANDASAH CONSULTANTS 2 2 DAR AL-HANDASAH CONSULTANTS 2 2 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2 2 WORLEYPARSONS LTD. 2 2 CH2M HILL 3 5 CH2M HILL 3 3 ARCADIS NV 3 3 MWH GLOBAL 3 1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 3 3 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. 4 4 EGIS 4 4 WSP 4 4 GRONTMIJ NV 4 3 POYRY 4 4 GOLDER ASSOCIATES CORP. 5 6 MOTT MACDONALD 5 5 ARUP GROUP LTD. 5 5 CH2M HILL 5 4 AMEC 5 7 MOTT MACDONALD 6 ** JACOBS 6 7 FUGRO NV 6 7 TETRA TECH INC. 6 6 SNC-LAVALIN INC. 6 ** PARSONS 7 8 ATKINS 7 6 RAMBOLL GROUP A/S 7 8 MOTT MACDONALD 7 5 JACOBS 7 ** JACOBS 8 3 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF 8 10 SWECO 8 ** ATKINS 8 8 BLACK & VEATCH 8 ** RAMBOLL GROUP A/S 9 7 ARUP GROUP LTD. 9 ** JACOBS 9 9 JACOBS 9 9 AF AB 9 8 DAR AL-HANDASAH CONSULTANTS 10 9 URS CORP. 10 9 GRONTMIJ NV 10 10 10 ** TETRA TECH INC. 10 ** STANTEC INC. BLACK & VEATCH Excerpted from Engineering News-Record, April 21/28; June 16/23; July 14/21 and July 28/August 4, 2014, copyright by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. with all rights reserved. This reprint implies no endorsement, either tacit or expressed, of any company, product, service or investment opportunity. #C30499 Reprinted by The YGS Group, 800.290.5460. For more information visit www.theYGSgroup.com/content. GREENEST BIG COMPANIES BEST CORPORATE STEWARD AWARD FINAlIST ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc
