Failure Analysis of Repeat Tooth Breakage of a 40MW Steam Turbine Load Gearbox William Liu Industrial Services, SGS New Zealand Ltd The Maintenance History of 40MW Steam Turbine Load Gearbox Commissioned in 1998. The First Tooth Breakage in 2003 (43,943 hours/109 cycles). The Second Tooth Breakage in 2010 (35,231 hours/109 cycles). 2 Heat Treatment Specifications Steel - 17CrNiMo6 - Hardenability good enough for the gear mode Normalizing Then, Case Hardening - deep case gas carburizing Case Depth: >1.7mm Case Hardness: 58 – 61HRC 3 Fractographic Examination Fatigue origin A Delaminating between the case and core B FFF Crack Fatigue origin A The broken segment Active flank Non-active flank The broken gear-tooth 4 A Typical Fatigue Tooth Breakage - Beachmarks Stereomicroscope (7X). 5 The Final Fast Fracture (FFF) Area The river/chevron patterns – cleavage (brittle) fracture. B Pint B point – FFF crack origin (did not continue from the existing fatigue cracks). 6 The Oil Degradation Deposits - An Auxiliary Fractographic Method 7 Hardness Tests and the Case Depth Measurement SPECIFICATIONS •Surface Hardness: 58 – 62 HRC •Case depth: >1.7 mm Conclusions: Insufficient case hardness Tip 56 HRC Insufficient case depth (shallow case) 1.2 mm 0.9 mm 0.9 mm Non-active flank 43 HRC Core 41 HRC Active flank 43 HRC 8 The Crack Propagation in the Subsurface Due to the Shallow Harden Case Sourced from: ASM Handbook, Volume 11, Failure Analysis and Prevention, Page 627. 9 Metallographic Examination Carburized Case (500X) Core (500X) Conclusion: Direct quenching (improper heat treatment) 10 Improper Heat Treatment vs Proper Heat Treatment Improper Heat Treatment Proper Heat Treatment 11 Microstructural Alternations - “Butterfly” Microcracks Before etching (50x) “Butterfly” After etching (50x) 12 The 3 Unjustified Previous Conclusions of Butterfly High Hertzian (contact) stress. Microcrack - Fatigue initiation. Induced by nonmetallic inclusions, carbides. A Typical Butterfly (500x) 13 A Butterfly in the Gear-root – Exclude the 3 Previous Conclusions Transgranular Crack Butterfly Gear-tooth Root Irrelevant to Hertzian stress. The butterfly microcrack did not initiate to fatigue. No inclusion/carbide found in the butterfly. 14 No Inclusion/Carbide Found in a Butterfly EDS1 EDS2 EDS2 EDS1 Elemen t CrK MnK FeK NiK Total Wt % 1.99 1.44 95.26 1.32 100 At % 2.13 1.46 95.16 1.25 100 Elemen t CrK MnK FeK NiK Total Wt % 2.05 1.61 94.93 1.41 100 At % 2.2 1.63 94.82 1.34 100 15 The Fatigue Crack Vs the Butterfly Microcracks Fatigue Crack Microcracks in the Propagation ‘Butterfly’ pattern 16 The Fractoraphy of the Butterflies The Fatigue Microcrack Origin in the Butterflies Crack Propagation Butterfly Fractography Stereomicroscope (20X) 17 Summary Practical Aspect: The root cause of repeat failures – Improper heat treatment. Successful solution – replaced gear from a different manufacturer. Academic Aspect: Some previous conclusions regarding ‘butterfly’ are not justified. Reveal the fractography of butterfly. Oil deposit - auxiliary fractographic method 18
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc