Zero Vision Tool and the Baltic Toolbox BPO 05.09.2014 Carl Carlsson, Swedish Shipowners´ Association STRATEGY & METHOD Co operation, knowledge sharing and structure Scanbunk: www.zerovisiontool.com/scanbunk Flexi: www.zerovisiontool.com/flexi SSD&B: www.zerovisiontool.com/ssdb LSR: www.zerovisiontool.com/lsr LNG CONV: www.zerovisiontool.com/lngconv EVO: www.zerovisiontool.com/evo SIC: www.zerovisiontool.com/sic IWW: www.zerovisiontool.com/iww Baltic Solution: www.zerovisiontool.com/balticsolution Zero Vision Tool: www.zerovisiontool.com STATUS - 120 organizations, - 11 JIP, - 7 Countries - 3 Pilots and - 1 JUP - €40 million EU grant ! - Industry invests €110 million Pilot Metanol Pilot LNG Pilot Skrubber The ROADMAP Gained experiences forwarded to the Roadmap Baltic SO2lution The PROCESS Baltic Toolbox The very basic principle Baltic Toolbox Industry needs Euro X Protection of the environment and “benefit to the society and the BS” Euro Y A financial mechanism Baltic Toolbox Draft HELCOM ZVT Benefit to the Society and BS ? - More frequent calls !? (Directive 2003/35/EC Article 5 - Flexibilities) R/Y/G Environment Health (Flexible mechanism?) Measure, Joint University Project Index Also needed in the investment phase Adm. - Simplify the administrative burden - The very same administrative procedure for Co-funding / lending? - Flexibility in time (!) / Country Infrastructure, incl. Bunker vessels! Water, Air, Safety, Modal Back-shift Port fees and Fairway dues Baltic Toolbox Cofunding - Semi-pilot - Pilots Joint Industry Projects - R&D-projects Try to avoid Modal back shift Early Movers Lending Risk sharing mechanisms a Baltic Risk Fund ECO-Bonus Baltic Toolbox Why? 20 – 30% Ex LNG Traditional vessel / project and financing solutions as usual 100% Baltic Risk Fund Development of new risk sharing mechanisms Baltic Sea Country no:1 Baltic Sea Country no:2 Baltic Sea Country no:x EIB, ESSF XXX X Euro Y% Baltic Risk Fund One part the CEF application Y% X Euro CEF It costs 20-30% more to invest in “Follower-project” and perhaps up to 100% for a “R&D-project”. There is a need for a co-funding of X% and loans of Y%. No one is willing to take any risks! Still we are all committed to take actions “to the benefit of the society and the Baltic Sea”. Therefore, the way forward is to share the risk among all stakeholders by trying to create a risk sharing mechanism. Traditional / conversely vessel / project. Financing solutions as usual up to the “ordinary 100%”. Industry, financial institutions, incl. commercial banks X of Followers X of Infra. projects X of Modal shift projects X of R&D projects MEASURE “Benefit to the Society and Baltic Sea” Health Environment Modal Shift Modal (back) Shift Safety Euro? MEASURE “Benefit to the Society and Baltic Sea” Industry needs Protection of the environment and “benefit to the society and the BS” A financial mechanism Reduction Reduction (%) Air emission SOx NOx PM CO2 Water discharge Black/Greywater Oil Other Noise 7 – (10) MEuro “0,8” 309 ton 124 ton 21 ton 4828 ton -85% -100% -98% -25% -100% -100% -30% The Joint Baltic Sea CEF-application Under development 1) INFRASTRUCTURE 2) FINANSIAL MECHANISM 3) ECO-BONUS 4) JOINT INDUSTRY PROJECTS Baltic Toolbox Other needed actions… A joint Baltic Sea Index Port fees and Fairway dues Early Movers discount - Port of Gothenburg! www.zerovisiontool.com
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc