nr.6 2014

Volume 45· Number 6· September 2014
International Review of
Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Published by the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich
www.ip.mpg.de
EDITORlAL
Great Data, Nice Tale, but What's the Message? The OHIM/EPO Study on the
Economie Relevanee of IP-Intensive
A. Kur- D.Harhoff
Industries
in the EU
617
ARTICLE5
The European
Patent with Unitary
the EU Competition
Effect: Incentive
to Dominate?
• A Look From
Law Viewpoint
M. Malaga 621
Can Non-Copyrightable
Works Be Protected
Under Unfair Competition
Law?
The Japanese "North Korea" Case
H.Shiomi
648
Special Criteria ofTrade
in the European
J.J. Sitko
Mark Protection
with Regard to Pharmaceutical
Union Legal System
658
~
~
Springer
Verlag C. H. Beek
Products
DECISIONS· COPYRIGHT LAW
Argentina
"Chinese Take-Away"·
Copyright
Law (No. 11.7
Art. 172 - in re"P., L. et al;"
Decision of the National Crimina I and Correctional
28 October 2013 - Case No. CCC13630/20121CA2
Ptlblil~bythel.bl{~lnnitut~forlnnov.tlon,nd(omPf'litioll.Munkh
www.lp.1flpg.M
Germany
"Rapidshare
11I"• Copyright
Act, Sec. 97; Teleml
Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgel
Volume 45· Number 6· September 2014
15 August 2013 - Case No. I ZR 80/12
716
DECISION • COPYRIGHT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION LAl
Japan
"Mitsurei
EDITORlAL
27" • Bern Convention
Art. 3(1 )(i); Copyright
Great Data, Niee Tale, but What's the Message? The OHIM/EPO Study on the Economie
Relevance of IP-Intensive
A. Kur D. Harhoff
Industries
in the EU
for the Protect
Act, Sec. 6(iii), Civil Codel
Nihon Telebi
Decision of the Supreme Court·
617
8 December 2011
ARTICLES
720
DECISION • TRADE MARK LAW
The European
Competition
M. Malaga
Patent with Unitary
Effect: Incentive
to Dominate?
• A Look From the EU
Law Viewpoint
France
"Christian
621
Dior" • Intellectual
Property Code, A
Decision of the Supreme Court (Cour de cassation)
Can Non-Copyrightable
Works Be Protected
Under Unfair Competition
Law? The Japanese
2 February 2010
724
"North Korea" Case
H. Shiomi
DECISION·
648
Special Criteria ofTrade
in the European
J.J. Sitko
658
Mark Protection
with Regard to Pharmaceutieal
Products
UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW
Germany
"Runes of Magie" • Act Against
Union Legal System
Unfair Competil
Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesge
17 July 2013 - Case No. I ZR 34/12
725
OPINION
CASE NOTE
Declaration
M. Lamping
on Patent Protection
• Regulatory
Sovereignty
under TRIPS
Argentina
679
Case Note on "Chinese Take-Away"
• Copyright
Art. 172 - in re"P., L. et al,"
DECISIONS. PATENT LAW
M. Marzetti
730
France
"Allergy
Treatment"
• European
Patent Convent ion, Art. 38 - Teva v.Sepracor
BOOK REVIEW
Decision of the Paris District Court (Tribunal de grande instance) .
6 October 2009
Wolfgang
699
Germany
"Dipeptidyl
Peptidase
Inhibitors"·
Patent Act, Secs. 21 (2) No. 1, 34(4)
Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof)
11 September 2013 - Case No. X ZB 8/12
.
700
Japan
"IBM Japan"·
Patent Act (old version),
Sec. 35(iii) and (iv) - Xv. HGSTJapan
Decision of the Tokyo District Court·
30 October 2013 - Case No. 2011 (wa) 21757
707
Fikentscher,
Culture,
Competition
A.Ayal
734
PhiJipp Hacker and Rup
and the Role of Law· Spi
momic
ltheEU
leJapanese
Jets
DECISIONS· COPYRIGHT LAW
Argentina
"Chinese Take-Away"· Copyright Law (No. 11.723), Art. 71; Criminal Code,
Art. 172 - in re"P., L. etaI."
Decision of the National Crimina I and Correctional Court of Appeals (Sth Charnber)28 October 2013 - Case No. CCC 13630/2012/CA2
711
Germany
"Rapidshare lil" • Copyright Act, Sec. 97; Telemedia Act, Secs. 7(2), 10
Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof)
15 August 2013 - Case No.1 ZR 80/12
716
DECISION· COPYRIGHT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION
.
LAW
Japan
"Mitsurei 27" • Bern Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistie Works,
Art. 3(1)(i); Copyright Act, Sec. 6(iii), Civil Code, Sec. 709 - Chosen Yushutsu Nyusha et al. v.
Nihon Telebi
Decision of the Supreme Court·
8 December 2011 720
DECISION • TRADE MARK LAW
France
"Christian Dior" • Intellectual Property Code, Art. L.713-4 - Copad v. Christian Dior et al.
Decision of the Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) .
2 February 2010 724
DECISION· UNFAIR COMPETITION
LAW
Germany
"Runes of Magie"· Act Against Unfair Competition, Annex to Sec 3(3) No. 28
Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof)
17July 2013 - Case No. I ZR 34/12
725
.
CASE NOTE
Argentina
Case Note on "Chinese Take-Away" • Copyright Law (No. 11.723), Art. 71; Criminal Code,
Art. 172-inre"P., L. etal."
M. Marzetti 730
BOOKREVIEW
Wolfgang Fikentscher, Philipp Hacker and Rupprecht Podszun: FairEconomy: Crises,
Culture, Competition and the Role of Law • Springer Publishing, Heidelberg 2013
A.Ayal 734

Download Report