Volume 45· Number 6· September 2014 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Published by the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich www.ip.mpg.de EDITORlAL Great Data, Nice Tale, but What's the Message? The OHIM/EPO Study on the Economie Relevanee of IP-Intensive A. Kur- D.Harhoff Industries in the EU 617 ARTICLE5 The European Patent with Unitary the EU Competition Effect: Incentive to Dominate? • A Look From Law Viewpoint M. Malaga 621 Can Non-Copyrightable Works Be Protected Under Unfair Competition Law? The Japanese "North Korea" Case H.Shiomi 648 Special Criteria ofTrade in the European J.J. Sitko Mark Protection with Regard to Pharmaceutical Union Legal System 658 ~ ~ Springer Verlag C. H. Beek Products DECISIONS· COPYRIGHT LAW Argentina "Chinese Take-Away"· Copyright Law (No. 11.7 Art. 172 - in re"P., L. et al;" Decision of the National Crimina I and Correctional 28 October 2013 - Case No. CCC13630/20121CA2 Ptlblil~bythel.bl{~lnnitut~forlnnov.tlon,nd(omPf'litioll.Munkh www.lp.1flpg.M Germany "Rapidshare 11I"• Copyright Act, Sec. 97; Teleml Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgel Volume 45· Number 6· September 2014 15 August 2013 - Case No. I ZR 80/12 716 DECISION • COPYRIGHT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION LAl Japan "Mitsurei EDITORlAL 27" • Bern Convention Art. 3(1 )(i); Copyright Great Data, Niee Tale, but What's the Message? The OHIM/EPO Study on the Economie Relevance of IP-Intensive A. Kur D. Harhoff Industries in the EU for the Protect Act, Sec. 6(iii), Civil Codel Nihon Telebi Decision of the Supreme Court· 617 8 December 2011 ARTICLES 720 DECISION • TRADE MARK LAW The European Competition M. Malaga Patent with Unitary Effect: Incentive to Dominate? • A Look From the EU Law Viewpoint France "Christian 621 Dior" • Intellectual Property Code, A Decision of the Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) Can Non-Copyrightable Works Be Protected Under Unfair Competition Law? The Japanese 2 February 2010 724 "North Korea" Case H. Shiomi DECISION· 648 Special Criteria ofTrade in the European J.J. Sitko 658 Mark Protection with Regard to Pharmaceutieal Products UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW Germany "Runes of Magie" • Act Against Union Legal System Unfair Competil Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesge 17 July 2013 - Case No. I ZR 34/12 725 OPINION CASE NOTE Declaration M. Lamping on Patent Protection • Regulatory Sovereignty under TRIPS Argentina 679 Case Note on "Chinese Take-Away" • Copyright Art. 172 - in re"P., L. et al," DECISIONS. PATENT LAW M. Marzetti 730 France "Allergy Treatment" • European Patent Convent ion, Art. 38 - Teva v.Sepracor BOOK REVIEW Decision of the Paris District Court (Tribunal de grande instance) . 6 October 2009 Wolfgang 699 Germany "Dipeptidyl Peptidase Inhibitors"· Patent Act, Secs. 21 (2) No. 1, 34(4) Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 11 September 2013 - Case No. X ZB 8/12 . 700 Japan "IBM Japan"· Patent Act (old version), Sec. 35(iii) and (iv) - Xv. HGSTJapan Decision of the Tokyo District Court· 30 October 2013 - Case No. 2011 (wa) 21757 707 Fikentscher, Culture, Competition A.Ayal 734 PhiJipp Hacker and Rup and the Role of Law· Spi momic ltheEU leJapanese Jets DECISIONS· COPYRIGHT LAW Argentina "Chinese Take-Away"· Copyright Law (No. 11.723), Art. 71; Criminal Code, Art. 172 - in re"P., L. etaI." Decision of the National Crimina I and Correctional Court of Appeals (Sth Charnber)28 October 2013 - Case No. CCC 13630/2012/CA2 711 Germany "Rapidshare lil" • Copyright Act, Sec. 97; Telemedia Act, Secs. 7(2), 10 Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 15 August 2013 - Case No.1 ZR 80/12 716 DECISION· COPYRIGHT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION . LAW Japan "Mitsurei 27" • Bern Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistie Works, Art. 3(1)(i); Copyright Act, Sec. 6(iii), Civil Code, Sec. 709 - Chosen Yushutsu Nyusha et al. v. Nihon Telebi Decision of the Supreme Court· 8 December 2011 720 DECISION • TRADE MARK LAW France "Christian Dior" • Intellectual Property Code, Art. L.713-4 - Copad v. Christian Dior et al. Decision of the Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) . 2 February 2010 724 DECISION· UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW Germany "Runes of Magie"· Act Against Unfair Competition, Annex to Sec 3(3) No. 28 Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 17July 2013 - Case No. I ZR 34/12 725 . CASE NOTE Argentina Case Note on "Chinese Take-Away" • Copyright Law (No. 11.723), Art. 71; Criminal Code, Art. 172-inre"P., L. etal." M. Marzetti 730 BOOKREVIEW Wolfgang Fikentscher, Philipp Hacker and Rupprecht Podszun: FairEconomy: Crises, Culture, Competition and the Role of Law • Springer Publishing, Heidelberg 2013 A.Ayal 734
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc