SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS CHAPTER6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The LEAFY (LFY)IFLORICAULA (FLO) gene isolated originally from Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum was earlier shown to be necessary for normal flower development in these species respectively. These genes encode for plant specific transcription factors required for the transition of plants from vegetative phase to the reproductive phase. They have dual roles in flowering - first in flower initiation and later in activation of floral homeotic genes (Parcy et al., 1998). The LEAFY gene has been cloned and characterized from a few species viz. tobacco (Kelly et al., 1995), Eucalyptus (Southerton et al., 1998), Pinus (Mouradov et al., 1998), tomato (Molinero-Rosales et al., 1999), poplar (Rottmann et al., 2000), apple (Wada et al., 2002), rubber (Dornealas and Rodrigues, 2005), papaya (Yu et al., 2005) and cedar (Dornealas and Rodrigues, 2005). Despite its sequence conservation in many species, significant differences in the expression pattern have been reported which point towards the functional divergence between them. In Antirrhinum majus, the expression is limited to the reproductive phase (Coen et al., 1990) while low levels have been detected also during vegetative phase in Arabidopsis, N. tabacum, Impatiens, P. sativum, Petunia and L. esculentum (Kelly et al., 1995; Blazquez et al., 1997; Bradley et al., 1997; Hofer et al., 199~; Pouteau et al., 1997; Souer et al., 1998; Molinero-Rosales et al., 1999). The loss-of-function mutants of tomato and pea indicate its role in leaf development also (Hofer et al., 1997; Molinero-Rosales et al., 1999). The expression pattern in monocots is more divergent. The expression of the LFY homolog in rice (RFL) is restricted to young panicles (Kyozuka et al., 1998). Unlike LFYIFLO gene expression which precedes AP1 expression, LtLFY from Lolium temulentum is expressed later than the AP1 ortholog, LtMADS2 (Gocal et al., 2001). In maize, zjl1zjl2 double mutants shows dramatically reduced number of tassel branches, indicating that these genes play a role in promoting branch establishment in addition to its role in flower development (Bomblies et al., 2003). The WFL expression pattern indicated that WFL is associated with spikelet formation rather than floral meristem identity in wheat (Shitsukawa et al., 2006). Constitutive expression of the LEAFY gene promotes flower initiation and development from shoot apical and axillary meristems in Arabidopsis and other dicot 65 and monocot species (Weigel and Nilsson, 1995; He et al., 2000; Pena et al., 2001), suggesting that its role during transition from the vegetative to the reproductive phase is conserved between widely related species within Angiosperms. The ability of the LFY gene to accelerate flowering has generated considerable interest to study its role in transition from vegetative to the reproductive phase and in the potential use of this gene for modulating flowering time in agriculturally important crops. The major objective of the present investigation was to overexpress the LEAFY gene from Arabidopsis thaliana in Brassica juncea and to clone and study the expression pattern of its homolog from B. juncea. The highlights of the present investigation are as follows: • The LEAFY eDNA from Arabidopsis thaliana was cloned under the control of a constitutive CaMV 35S promoter in a binary vector, pCAMBIA 1304, containing gfp:gus reporter gene, hygromycin phosphotransferase II (hpt II) gene as the plant selectable marker gene and neomycin phosphotransferase II (npt II) gene as bacterial selection gene. The constructs harbouring the LFY gene in the sense and antisense orientation were named as pSL and pASL respectively. • Brassica juncea cv. Varuna was transformed using Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 harbouring pSL and pASL • The TO and Tl transgenic plants were characterized at the molecular level by Southern and northern blot analysis. All the antisense plants analyzed had a single copy T-DNA insertion while some of the sense lines had multiple copies of the LFY gene of A. thaliana inserted in the B. juncea genome. A fusion transcript was observed in all the transgenic plants but not in the wild type untransformed control plant. • Transgenic plants of B. juncea overexpressing the LFY gene from A. thaliana in sense orientation flowered about a week earlier as compared to the wild type untransformed control plant and the antisense transgenic plants. The early flowering in transgenic plants was not accompanied with any yield loss. The transgenic plants overexpressing the LFY gene had similar morphology and growth pattern as the wild type untransformed control plants. • The expression of endogenous LFY gene in different vegetative and reproductive organs was analyzed in B. juncea. The LFY transcript was more 66 abundant in sepals and pistils compared to the other floral organs. The expression of this gene was also detected in stem, mature leaves and bracts. • The expression of LFY gene in leaves during different stages of plant growth was also investigated. The expression was more in the cotyledonary leaves, decreased in the developing leaves during the vegetative phase and again increased in these leaves during the reproductive phase. • The expression pattern of LFY gene was studied in the shoot apices of different cultivars of B. juncea with varying flowering time. The level of the transcript was more in the early flowering variety, TN1, compared to the late flowering ones, PNMB and RNBL, during the initial stages (1 0 to 24-days ). The LFY gene expression could also be detected in the vegetative apices and the expression increased during the transition phase from the vegetative to the reproductive phase. • The effect of sucrose on in vitro flowering of B. juncea was investigated and the consequent effect on LFY gene expression studied. Sucrose promotes flowering in B. juncea probably by acting as an inducer of the LFY gene. • The effect of different cytokinins and gibberellic acid on LFY transcript level was also studied. While cytokinin had a promotive effect on LFY expression gibberellin inhibited LFY gene expression. • A LEAFY eDNA (BjLEAFY-P) of 1261 bp was cloned from eDNA library of B. juncea cv. Pusa Bold. This clone, however, had a single base deletion at 762 bp and therefore encoded for a truncated protein of 284 amino acids with a molecular weight of 31 kDa. This truncated protein showed significant homology with the other LFY sequences present in the database. • A eDNA (1290 bp) encoding for a full length LFY protein (420 amino acids) was also cloned from B. juncea cv. Varuna. This was 99% similar to A. thaliana LFY protein and the truncated protein from B. juncea cv. Pusa Bold. The encoded protein had a pi 6.48 and molecular weight 46 kDa. • Dendrogram analysis of the LFY proteins from different cultivars of Brassica juncea showed that it is closer to the A. thaliana (LFY) and B. oleracea (BOFH) proteins. • Analysis of the deduced amino acid sequence of the LFY proteins from B. juncea showed the presence of typical FLOILFY motifs, characteristic of 67 the transcription factors. These were proline rich regions at theN-terminus and the acidic domain. • The CO gene expression in B. juncea cv. Varuna was also studied. It is circadian regulated with a peak in expression after 20 hr and then a decrease after 40 hr of transfer to continuous darkness. The CO mRNA levels remained high till 16 hr when a night break (red light irradiation for 5 min) was given following which its level decreased. The maximum expression was observed in the photoperiod 8 hr dark and 6 hr light. • A eDNA (1033 bp) encoding CONST ANS-like 1 protein (337 amino acids) was cloned from B. juncea cv. Varuna. It has a pi 6.1 and molecular weight 39 kDa. It has the typical B-box type zinc finger motifs and CCT motif as found in CO and CO-like proteins. • Dendrogram analysis of COL proteins showed that the B. juncea, B. napus and B. nigra are very close to each other. Conclusions In this study, transgenic plants of B. juncea constitutively expressing the LFY gene were developed which flowered one week earlier as compared to the untransformed control plant. No yield penalty accompanied this early flowering. The LFY homologs from two cultivars of B. juncea (Pusa Bold and Varuna) were isolated. While the LFY eDNA from Varuna encoded for a full-length protein, the one isolated from Pusa Bold encoded for a truncated protein. The expression pattern of the LFY gene in B. juncea was also analysed during the vegetative and the reproductive development. The expression increased during the transition from the vegetative to the reproductive phase and the abundance of the transcript was more in the early flowering varieties. The CO gene expression pattern in B. juncea cotyledonary leaves was observed to follow a circadian rhythm. A COLI eDNA from B. juncea cv. Varuna has also been isolated. Future Perspectives Isolation and characterization of the cis elements present within the promoter of the BjLFY eDNA isolated in the present investigation could provide an insight into the expression pattern of the gene. A study of the phosphorylation pattern of BjLFY 68 protein would help in elucidating its effect on LFY function. The downstream targets of LFY gene can be identified and the effect of overexpression of LFY on those could be analyzed in the B. juncea transgenic plants overexpressing the LFY gene. If the overexpression of the BjLFY eDNA in a heterologous system also leads to early flowering, it can be of use in horticulture. The COLI eDNA isolated in the present investigation needs further characterization and elucidation of its role in flowering time. Thus, a lot of basic research needs to be continued in this complex area to solve many intriguing questions. 69
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc