Final Outcome of HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014

HELSINKI COMMISSION
HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014
Group of Experts on Safety of Navigation
Fourth Meeting
Helsinki, Finland, 4 February 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OUTCOME OF THE FOURTH MEETING OF GROUP OF EXPERTS ON SAFETY OF
NAVIGATION (HELCOM SAFE NAV) ........................................................ 2
Introduction
................................................................................................................... 2
Agenda Item 1 Adoption of the Agenda .............................................................................. 2
Agenda Item 2 HELCOM MARTIME meetings and HELCOM Ministerial Meeting 2013 ..... 2
Agenda Item 3 Accidents and ship traffic in the Baltic Sea ................................................. 3
Agenda Item 4 Potential synergies between HELCOM re-surveys and BOSB ................... 5
Agenda Item 5 New traffic measures in the Baltic Sea ....................................................... 6
Agenda Item 6 Any other business..................................................................................... 6
Agenda Item 7 Outcome and next meeting ........................................................................ 7
Annex 1 List of Participants ................................................................................................... 8
Annex 2 List of Contact Addresses of HELCOM SAFE NAV ................................................10
Page 1 of 11
OUTCOME OF HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014
OUTCOME OF THE FOURTH MEETING OF
GROUP OF EXPERTS ON SAFETY OF NAVIGATION
(HELCOM SAFE NAV)
INTRODUCTION
0.1
The Fourth Meeting of the HELCOM Group of Experts on Safety of Navigation
(HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014) was held at the premises of the Finnish Transport Safety
Agency (Trafi) in Helsinki, Finland, on 4 February 2014.
0.2
The Meeting was chaired by Mr. Valtteri Laine, Finland.
0.3
The Meeting was attended by experts from Denmark, Finland, Germany, Latvia,
Poland, Russia and Sweden. The List of Participants is attached as Annex 1.
0.4
Mr. Hermanni Backer, Professional Secretary of HELCOM, acted as secretary of
the Meeting, assisted by Ms. Laura Meski, Assisting Professional Secretary of HELCOM.
0.5
Mr. Laine opened the Meeting and welcomed the participants to Trafi.
0.6
Mr. Backer also welcomed the participants on behalf of HELCOM and informed
that HELCOM is celebrating its 40th anniversary in 2014 as the Convention on the Protection
of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area (Helsinki Convention) was signed in 1974.
Agenda Item 1
Adoption of the Agenda
Documents: 1/1
1.1
The Meeting adopted the Provisional Annotated Agenda as contained in
document 1/1.
Agenda Item 2
HELCOM MARTIME meetings and HELCOM Ministerial
Meeting 2013
Documents: 2/1/INF, 2/1/INF/Add, 2/2
2.1
The Meeting took note of the information on the 2013 HELCOM Ministerial
Meeting, which was held on 3 October 2013 in Copenhagen, Denmark, and the maritime
traffic related commitments included in the HELCOM Copenhagen Ministerial Declaration
(document 2/1/INF).
2.2
The Meeting took note of the new HELCOM Recommendation 34E/2 on further
testing and developing the concept of pro-active route planning as well as other e-navigation
solutions to enhance safety of navigation and protection of the marine environment in the
Baltic Sea Region as adopted by the 2013 HELCOM Ministerial Meeting (document
2/1/INF/Add).
2.3
The Meeting discussed implementation of e-navigation solutions, a commitment
by the 2013 HELCOM Ministerial Meeting.
2.4
The Meeting took note of the presentation by Mr. Andres Brödje, Sweden, on the
MONALISA 2.0 project (Presentation 1).
2.5
The Meeting welcomed the offer by Sweden to organize a targeted event as a
joint venture between HELCOM, Baltic Sea Region e-Navigation Forum and other initiatives
active in the field of e-navigation (e.g. the e-Navigation Underway Conference and the
standard implementation plan) likely during spring 2014.
2.6
The Meeting took note of the information by Sweden that IMO has an ongoing
process to standardise e-navigation systems by 2018 and that e-navigation has benefits in
terms of reductions in cost and environmental impact, predicting rush areas based on route
exchange.
Page 2 of 11
OUTCOME OF HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014
2.7
The Meeting noted that it seems that in some cases the exchange of route
information electronically is less visible to third parties, like VTS personnel, which is a
potential safety risk which will be considered in the MONALISA 2.0 project.
2.8
The Meeting noted that the MONALISA project has published a report “Legal
impacts of the MONALISA project on the international legal framework for navigation at sea”
by Professor of Maritime Law, Proshanto K. Mukherjee, Faculty of Law, Lund University,
Sweden.
2.9
The Meeting noted that Australia will apply a regional system of electronic route
exchange in the Great Barrier Reef area.
2.10
The Meeting took note that all international treaties have their own fields of
application e.g. UNCLOS on a general aspects of ocean governance, SOLAS and
COLREGS on safety of navigation.
2.11
The Meeting took note of the outcome of 12th and 13th Meeting of the HELCOM
Maritime Group (document 2/2) and decided to consider the requests by the Maritime Group
and other issues of relevance under relevant Agenda Items.
Agenda Item 3
Accidents and ship traffic in the Baltic Sea
Documents: 3/1, 3/2/INF
3.1
The Meeting appreciated the HELCOM video “Baltic Sea Shipping Visualized”
available via YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CBgs5O1WPc, which was
produced for and presented at the 2013 HELCOM Ministerial Meeting to increase the
awareness on the maritime traffic in the Baltic Sea.
3.2
The Meeting clarified the origin of the data in the video being various HELCOM
maritime related data including AIS, accidents and illegal spills. The accidents and illegal
spills data included in the video is freely downloadable from the HELCOM Map and Data
service. Historical AIS data is available to public sector actors of the Baltic Sea countries
according to the terms specified in the HELCOM Recommendation 33/1 via national
administration administering AIS, or via the Secretariat ([email protected]).
3.3
The Meeting took note of the presentation by the Secretariat on the maritime
traffic situation in the Baltic Sea in 2012 and the still open issues regarding Danish data in
the HELCOM report on shipping accidents in the Baltic Sea in 2012 (Presentation 2).
3.4
The Meeting noted that a differentiation of accidents in the open sea, port
approach and port had been included in the draft report for 2012 according to the advice by
HELCOM SAFE NAV 3/2013 (paragraph 4.12). The preliminary results of the 2012 shipping
accidents data show that 35% of the accidents occurred in the open sea while 59% took
place close to the shore (port or port approach).
3.5
The Meeting appreciated the addition of this valuable information into the report
and suggested that the differentiation would also be introduced into the graphs on collisions
and groundings.
3.6
The Meeting considered the information added to the draft report on the
subcategories of the human element (violation, slip, lapse, and mistake) valuable but noted
that as such differentiation is in some cases only available after a completed accident
investigation. Thus this information might not be available when reporting the annual
shipping accident data to HELCOM.
3.7
The Meeting noted that the original suggestion by Russia was to include the
human element subcategories only for serious and very serious accidents using the IMO
categories (IMO Resolution A.884(21): Amendments to the Code for the Investigation of
Marine Casualties and Incidents).
3.8
The Meeting raised concern that the human element subcategories only point
towards the navigator and that only in few cases have accident investigations been extended
Page 3 of 11
OUTCOME OF HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014
to cover factors like company policy or land personnel decisions which are outside the
navigators sphere of influence.
3.9
The Meeting requested the Contracting Parties to provide any additional
suggestions for improving future reports to the Secretariat ([email protected]) at the
latest by 21 February 2014.
3.10
The Meeting considered development of the annual HELCOM accident reports as
important, agreed to send the 2013 data to the Secretariat in the usual manner as a reply to
an email request, to be sent out by the end of February 2014 and requested the Secretariat
to consider ways how to make the regional data submissions as easy as possible for all the
Contracting Parties.
3.11
The Meeting took note of document 3/2/INF and discussed the reporting of
shipping accidents to HELCOM in relation to the European Marine Casualty Information
Platform (EMCIP).
3.12
The Meeting welcomed the information that HELCOM has received a letter from
the European Union in August 2013 and oral communication in December 2013, according to
which there are no legal obstacles to create a system enabling a data transmission from
EMCIP to HELCOM (such system already exists for EMCIP-IMO) but that it will always
involve a manual confirmation step by which the country should select and send the data to
the HELCOM Secretariat, and that the Secretariat has been invited to discuss technical
details of such possible system with EMSA keeping in mind that the HELCOM accident data
involves all the Baltic Sea countries..
3.13
The Meeting noted that the HELCOM report on shipping accidents have added
value to reports from EMSA which do not cover all Baltic Sea countries and are not produced
annually (previous published in 2010) and that there has been some difficulties for countries
to receive information from another country via EMCIP.
3.14
The meeting requested that Secretariat will keep the SAFE NAV group informed
of the developments during the spring.
3.15
The Meeting took note of the information by Mr, Laine, Finland, on the Airline
Risk Management Solutions (ARMS) risk assessment tool under development in Finland and
requested Finland to provide an update of the risk assessment development at the next
meeting of HELCOM SAFE NAV.
3.16
The Meeting considered the draft guidelines on vessel's safe under keel
clearance (UKC) (document 3/1) and agreed that in general such regional guidelines would
be helpful to improve the maritime safety in the Baltic Sea even if the details have to be
worked out.
3.17
The Meeting provided specific comments to document 3/1 and possible further
developments as follows:
- The illustration included as last page of document 3/1 was created based on
national standards of the Russian Federation and that in order to be useful it
should be compared with similar information from other countries.
- There are many different areas in the Baltic Sea, both in terms of hydrographic
features and national practices around UKC which create certain limits for the
drafting of guidelines.
- There is ongoing work within e.g. World Association for Waterborne Transport
Infrastructure (PIANC) which could be used as material for drafting the
guidelines.
- The guidelines could include some of the underlying physical and mathematical
assumptions.
- The International Safety Management (ISM) Code requires shipping companies
to take into account “all guidelines etc...” this makes it sensitive to draft new
guidelines.
Page 4 of 11
OUTCOME OF HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014
- The guideline could primarily apply for the open seas, as well as transit routes in
connection to IMO routeing measures in the Baltic Sea (“HELCOM Routeing”) but
also cover other parts of the Baltic Sea and coastal waters as appropriate. The
scope of application should be defined during the drafting process.
- Domestic and Baltic Sea regional dimensions could be kept separate.
- Terminology could be clarified as various definitions are used in the current draft.
- There is a lot of tanker traffic in and out of the Baltic Sea and to clarify port state
obligations it would be helpful to have Baltic-wide guidelines on UKC.
- Some countries do not recommend UKC on a national level and the mariners
have the full responsibility in this issue and in this kind of scenario the guidelines
should target the mariner.
- Such guidelines should use wording “should”, not “shall”.
- The Mariners Routeing Guide Baltic Sea could be used to inform of finalised
guidelines.
- It should be decided to whom such UKC recommendations is to be addressed
(masters, states or other).
3.18
Based on the discussions the Meeting agreed to establish a Correspondence
Group (CG) to develop regional Baltic Sea recommendations for UKC.
3.19
The Meeting agreed that the work of the CG should focus on the open seas and
transit routes in the Baltic Sea and that in terms of wording the recommendations should
target the master but be useful for all concerned parties.
3.20
The Meeting welcomed the offer by Finland to lead the CG under HELCOM
SAFE NAV and requested Finland and the Secretariat to develop a first draft of the Terms of
Reference of the CG, to be agreed on by the CG at its first meeting to take place online.
3.21
The Meeting agreed that the CG should aim in developing a first draft by 1 April
2014 and a new draft for the HELCOM SAFE NAV in December 2014.
3.22
The Meeting requested Denmark to provide input regarding the formal aspects of
the recommendation document (e.g. HELCOM and IMO) for the next meeting of HELCOM
SAFE NAV.
3.23
The Meeting took note of the current situation on Automatic Identification System
(AIS) in the Baltic Sea and considered the benefits and costs of increasing the frequency of
AIS stored in the HELCOM servers hosted by Denmark.
3.24
The Meeting noted that it is possible to store up to two years of such shorter
interval AIS data at Danish Maritime Authority servers, but after that period it would be
transferred to more static forms of data archiving.
3.25
The Meeting requested that the technical details of this possibility to store such
high density AIS data would be discussed at the next meeting of the HELCOM Expert
Working Group for Mutual Exchange and Deliveries of AIS data (HELCOM AIS EWG) to be
held on 21-22 May 2014 in Haugesund, Norway.
Agenda Item 4
Potential synergies between HELCOM re-surveys and
BOSB
Documents: None
4.1
The Meeting took note of the presentation by Mr. Gunnar Möller, Baltic Ordnance
Safety Board (BOSB), on their work to clear unexploded ordnance (UXO) in the Baltic Sea
region (Presentation 3). BOSB is the regional cooperation structure prioritizing areas to be
cleared of UXOs in the Baltic Sea region.
Page 5 of 11
OUTCOME OF HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014
4.2
The Meeting took note of the information by Keimo Parkkinen, BOSB, on old
mines and an anchorage area in the vicinity of Kotka.
4.3
The Meeting took note of the information that the Russian Federation has special
procedures for anchorages due to old mine-like objects.
4.4
The Meeting took note of the presentation by Mr. Juha Korhonen, Finland, on the
re-survey activities in the Baltic Sea (Presentation 4). The Baltic Sea Hydrographic
Commission (BSHC) is regional cooperation under the International Hydrographic
Organization (IHO) which has since long been cooperating with HELCOM to implement the
regional re-survey scheme, originally adopted at the HELCOM Meeting of Ministers of
Transport in Copenhagen 2001.
4.5
The Meeting welcomed information sharing between BOSB and HELCOM SAFE
NAV as a mean to enhance safety of navigation in the Baltic Sea, requested the Secretariat
to relay information between HELCOM and BOSB and considered it useful to also share
information between BOSB and the HELCOM Expert Group on Environmental Risks of
Hazardous Submerged Objects (HELCOM SUBMERGED), which will draft a HELCOM
assessment on hazardous underwater objects. The first meeting of HELCOM SUBMERGED
will be organised during spring 2014.
Agenda Item 5
New traffic measures in the Baltic Sea
Documents: None
5.1
The Meeting took note of the information by Poland that no major development
has been made since HELCOM SAFE NAV 3/2013 on the proposal for a recommended
deep-water route in the southern Baltic Sea for ships of draft more than 12 m bound for or
leaving the Gulf of Gdansk. Consultation with Sweden and Denmark was carried out in
September 2012 but there was no consultation in 2013. .
5.2
Poland informed further that two serious accidents have occurred in the area
recently, most recently the grounding of bulk carrier with a draft of 14,3 m on the eastern
approaches of the TSS Slupska bank, indicating the need for the deep-water route.
5.3
Poland underlined Article 22 of UNCLOS which states that existing traffic patterns
should be taken into account during drafting proposal.
5.4
The Meeting further noted that licensing of wind farms is ongoing in the area and
thus the space for routing measures should be secured.
5.5
The Meeting recommended that Denmark, Poland and Sweden communicate
intersessionally on this issue and invited these countries to report on any possible progress
in the matter at the next meeting, as appropriate.
5.6
The Meeting took note of the information from Denmark of the considerations to
extend the inshore traffic zone of the TSS Bornholmsgat around the Port of Rönne and on
the intention to keep HELCOM SAFE NAV updated on the decisions which will be made.
Agenda Item 6
Any other business
Documents: 6/1, 6/2/INF
6.1
The Meeting took note of the presentation by Ms. Monica Sundklev, Sweden, on
the outcome of the meeting of the SRS/VTS Harmonization Working Group (HWG) held on 6
February 2013 in Gothenburg, Sweden, which discussed the United Nations LOCODE
(LOCODE) (Presentation 5). LOCODEs are unique identifiers for port locations.
6.2
6/2/INF).
The Meeting took note of the SafeSeaNet LOCODEs Guidelines (document
6.3
The Meeting noted the difficulties with the LOCODEs as cities like Hamburg have
more than 40 separate LOCODEs and some destinations like offshore installations may lack
LOCODES, and as the use of LOCODEs is not obligatory (IMO circular).
Page 6 of 11
OUTCOME OF HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014
6.4
The Meeting welcomed the proposal by Sweden to consult IHO on the possible
use of UN/LOCODEs as an ENC option.
6.5
The Meeting took note of the information by Germany that only one small change
to the sixth version of the HELCOM Transit Guide for the Baltic Sea has been provided and
thus no new version of the Transit Guide has been published. The Meeting invited the
Contracting Parties to provide any possible updates to Kai-Oliver Twest ([email protected]).
6.6
The Meeting noted that there is no additional information on the EU BLAST
(Bringing Land and Sea Together) project since HELCOM SAFE NAV 3/2013 only that the
project has been finalized.
6.7
The Meeting took note of the proposal for a HELCOM Assessment on Maritime
Activities in the Baltic Sea region to be completed by 2016. The Secretariat welcomed input
to the assessment by HELCOM SAFE NAV and by the Contracting Parties. The Meeting
requested the Secretariat to circulate the draft outline for the assessment.
6.8
The Meeting updated the List of Contact Addresses of HELCOM SAFE NAV
(document 6/1). The list of nominated experts for HELCOM SAFE NAV is contained in
Annex 2.
6.9
The Meeting thanked Finland for hosting HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014 and Mr.
Laine for acting as a chair of the Meeting.
Agenda Item 7
Outcome and next meeting
Documents: None
7.1
The Meeting agreed that the next meeting of the Group of Experts on Safety of
Navigation (HELCOM SAFE NAV 5/2015) will tentatively be held on 3 December 2014 in
Copenhagen, Denmark.
7.2
The Meeting invited the Contacting Parties to consider hosting future meetings of
the Group.
7.3
The Meeting adopted the draft Outcome of the Meeting.
7.4
The final Outcome of the Meeting was finalized by the Secretariat in cooperation
with the Chair of the meeting and circulated on 6 February 2014.
Page 7 of 11
OUTCOME OF HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014
ANNEX 1
ANNEX 1 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
CHAIR
Mr. Valtteri Laine
Finnish Transport Safety Agency (TraFi)
Kumpulantie 9
FI-00520 Helsinki
Dir.Phone: +358 400644198
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
DENMARK
Mr. Carsten Jensen
Danish Maritime Authority
Carl Jacobsens Vej 31
DK-2500 Valby
Dir.Phone: +45 22483729
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
FINLAND
Mr. Juha Korhonen
Mr. Tuomas Martikainen
Finnish Transport Agency
Hydrographic Office
P.O. Box 33
FI-00521 Helsinki
Finnish Transport Agency
Hydrographic Office
P.O. Box 33
FI-00520 Helsinki
Dir.Phone: +358 400815180
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
Dir.Phone: +358 295343214
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
GERMANY
Mr. Hans-Heinrich Callsen-Bracker
Ministry of Transport and Digital
Infrastructure
Robert-Schuman-Platz 1
D-53175 Bonn
Dir.Phone: +49 2283004636
Fax: +49 2283008074636
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Kai-Oliver Twest
Federal Maritime and Hydrographic
Agency
Bernhard-Nocht-Str. 78
D-20359 Hamburg
Dir.Phone: +49 4031904300
Fax: +49 4031905021
Email: [email protected]
LATVIA
Mr. Madars Dilbergs
Maritime Administration of Latvia
Maritime Safety Department
5 Trijadibas Str.
LV-1048 Riga
Dir.Phone: +371 67062174
Fax: +371 67860082
Email: [email protected]
POLAND
Ms. Magdalena Jablonowska
Mr. Bogdan Rojek
Ministry of Infrastructure and
Development
4/6 Chalubinskiego Str.
PL-00 928 Warsaw
Maritime Office in Gdynia
Ul. Chrzanowskiego 10
PL-81 338 Gdynia
Dir.Phone: +48 226301639
Fax: + 48 22 630 14 97
Email:
[email protected]
Dir.Phone: +48 586205013
Fax: +48 586616656
Email: [email protected]
RUSSIA
Mr. Vladimir Vasilyev
Central Marine Research and Design
Institute
Kavalergardskaya Str.6
RU-191 015 St. Petersburg
Page 8 of 11
Dir.Phone: +7 9219694103
Fax: +7 8122743864
Email: [email protected]
OUTCOME OF HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014
ANNEX 1
SWEDEN
Mr. Anders Brödje
Swedish Maritime Administration
Lindholmspiren 5
SE-417 56 Gothenburg
Dir.Phone: +46 104786053
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Andreas Holmgren
Swedish Transport Agency
SE-601 73 Norrköping
Ms. Monica Sundklev
Swedish Transport Agency
SE-601 73 Norrköping
Dir.Phone: 46 10 4953328
Fax:
Email:
Andreas.Holmgren@transportstyrelsen.
se
Dir.Phone: +46 767211049
Fax:
Email:
[email protected]
INVITED GUESTS
Mr. Gunnar Möller
Mr. Keimo Parkkinen
Ordnance Safety Board (BOSB)
Swedish Armed Forces and Baltic
4.Naval Warfare Flotilla
MWDC
SE-130 61 Hårsfjärden
Ordnance Safety Board (BOSB)
Archipelago Sea Naval Command
P.O Box 5
FI-20241 TURKU
Dir.Phone: +46 10 823 8374
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
Dir.Phone: +358 299 313 180
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
HELCOM SECRETARIAT
Mr. Hermanni Backer
Professional Secretary
Helsinki Commission
Katajanokanlaituri 6 B
FI-00160 Helsinki
Dir.Phone: +358 468509199
Fax: +358 207412645
Email: [email protected]
Ms. Laura Meski
Assisting Professional Secretary
Helsinki Commission
Katajanokanlaituri 6 B
FI-00160 Helsinki
Dir.Phone: +358 401622053
Fax: +358 207412645
Email: [email protected]
Page 9 of 11
OUTCOME OF HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014
ANNEX 2
ANNEX 2 LIST OF CONTACT ADDRESSES OF HELCOM SAFE NAV
CONTACT ADDRESSES OF HELCOM SAFE NAV
DENMARK
Mr. Carsten Jensen
Danish Maritime Authority
Carl Jacobsens Vej 31
DK-2500 Valby
Dir.Phone: +45 22483729
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
ESTONIA
Mr. Peep Kaurla
Estonian Maritime Administration
9 Lume Str.
EE-10416 Tallinn
Dir.Phone: +372 6205709
Fax: +372 6205706
Email: [email protected]
FINLAND
Ms. Laura Aho
Ministry of Transport and
Communication
P.O. Box 31
FI-00023 Government
Dir.Phone: +358 29516001
Fax: +358 916028596
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Valtteri Laine
Finnish Transport Safety Agency (TraFi)
P.O. Box 320
FI-00520 Helsinki
Dir.Phone: +358 400644198
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Tuomas Martikainen
Finnish Transport Agency
Hydrographic Office
P.O. Box 33
FI-00520 Helsinki
Ministry of Transport and
Communications
Transport Management
P.O. Box 31
FI–00023 Government
Finnish Transport Safety Agency
P.O. Box 320
FI-00101 Helsinki
Dir.Phone: +358 295343214
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
Ms. Hanna Perälä
Mr. Aleksi Uttula
Dir.Phone: +358 916028009
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
Dir.Phone:
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
GERMANY
Mr. Hans-Heinrich Callsen-Bracker
Mr. Kai-Oliver Twest
Ministry of Transport and Digital
Infrastructure
Robert-Schuman-Platz 1
D-53175 Bonn
Federal Maritime and Hydrographic
Agency
Bernhard-Nocht-Str. 78
D-20359 Hamburg
Dir.Phone: +49 2283004636
Fax: +49 2283008074636
Email: [email protected]
Dir.Phone: +49 4031904300
Fax: +49 4031905021
Email: [email protected]
LATVIA
Mr. Madars Dilbergs
Maritime Administration of Latvia
Maritime Safety Department
5 Trijadibas Str.
LV-1048 Riga
Dir.Phone: +371 67062174
Fax: +371 67860082
Email: [email protected]
LITHUANIA
Mr. Alfridas Ulozas
Lithuanian Maritime Safety
Administration
Vessel Traffic Monitoring Division
J. Janonio str. 24
LT-92251 Klaipeda
Page 10 of 11
Dir.Phone: +370 46469696
Fax: +370 46469600
Email: [email protected]
OUTCOME OF HELCOM SAFE NAV 4/2014
ANNEX 2
POLAND
Ms. Magdalena Jablonowska
Mr. Bogdan Rojek
Ministry of Infrastructure and
Development
4/6 Chalubinskiego Str.
PL-00 928 Warsaw
Maritime Office in Gdynia
Ul. Chrzanowskiego 10
PL-81 338 Gdynia
Dir.Phone: +48 226301639
Fax: + 48 22 6301497
Email:
[email protected]
Dir.Phone: +48 586205013
Fax: +48 586616656
Email: [email protected]
RUSSIA
Mr. Vladimir Vasilyev
Central Marine Research and Design
Institute
Kavalergardskaya Str.6
RU-191 015 St. Petersburg
Dir.Phone: +7 9219694103
Fax: +7 8122743864
Email: [email protected]
SWEDEN
Mr. Andreas Holmgren
Swedish Transport Agency
SE-601 73 Norrköping
Dir.Phone: 46 10 4953328
Fax:
Email:
[email protected]
e
OBSERVERS
KIMO
Ms. Camilla Witt
KIMO Baltic Sea
Varvsgatan 4
SE-272 36 Simrishamn
Dir.Phone: +46 766338571
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
WWF
Mr. Mattias Rust
WWF Sweden
Ulriksdals Slott
SE-170 81 Solna
Dir.Phone: +46 702126314
Fax: +46 8851329
Email: [email protected]
Page 11 of 11