1 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved.

1 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Top Five Asian Cancers -­‐ Trends in Clinical Development Rachel Meighan-­‐Mantha, PhD Principal Analyst, Oncology 2 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Predicted Incidence of Top Five Asian Cancers 2500000 2012 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 By 2035, incidence of these cancers will increase by rates of 51-­‐97%. 2000000 1500000 1000000 500000 0 Lung Stomach Breast Colorectal Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray, F.
GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet].
Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr, accessed in April 2014.
3 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Liver Predicted Mortality of Top Five Asian Cancers 2000000 2012 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 By 2035, mortality of these cancers will increase by rates of 63-­‐101%. 1500000 1000000 500000 0 Lung Stomach Breast Colorectal Liver Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray, F.
GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet].
Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr, accessed in April 2014.
4 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Summary • 
• 
• 
• 
• 
Basic Questions
Primary Drugs and Mechanisms of Action
Primary Endpoints and Trial Outcomes
Biomarkers
Correlations, Trends and Opportunities
5 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Basic QuesPons 6 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Where are clinical trials taking place in Asia? Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014 and XLCubed.com
7 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Where are clinical trials taking place in Asia? Trials recruiPng the most paPents are in Japan, China and South Korea. By Status
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 By Phase
3000 0 China China Hong Kong Hong Kong India India Japan Japan Malaysia Malaysia Philippines Philippines Singapore Singapore South Korea Only later stage trials take place in Thailand, Phillippines and Malaysia. 1000 2000 3000 South Korea Taiwan Taiwan Thailand Thailand Planned Open Temporarily Closed Closed Terminated Completed Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
8 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. I I/II II II/III III Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
III/IV IV Where are clinical trials taking place in Asia? By Patient Segment
0 1000 2000 By Sponsor Type
3000 0 China China Hong Kong Hong Kong India India Japan Japan Malaysia Malaysia Philippines Philippines Singapore South Korea Taiwan Thailand Trials with all paPent segments occur in the top 10 countries. First Line Second Line Neoadjuvant Adjuvant Maintenance Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
9 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. 2000 3000 Non-­‐Industry sponsors more trials than Industry in Japan, China and South Korea. Singapore South Korea Taiwan Thailand Industry 1000 Joint Non-­‐Industry Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
What sponsor types are conducPng trials? By Disease
By Start Year
2500 Non-­‐Industry 2000 400 Industry Joint Joint Industry Non-­‐Industry 300 Non-­‐Industry sponsorship has rapidly outpaced Industry and Joint sponorship since the late 1990s. 1500 200 1000 100 500 0 0 Lung Gastric Breast Colorectal Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
10 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Liver Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
What sponsor types are conducPng trials? By Phase
By Status
4000 Non-­‐Industry 4000 Joint Joint Industry 3000 Non-­‐Industry alone sponsors 84% of phase II trials. Joint sponsorship occurs most frequently in phase II and III trials . 2000 1000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 I I/II II II/III III Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
11 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. IV Non-­‐industry Other Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
Industry Top 10 Industry sponsors conduct trials in many different countries. Industry
Top 10 Non-­‐
Industry sponsors conduct trials usually in just one country. Non-Industry
Where are they conducPng these trials? Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
12 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. What trials have they conducted recently? Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
13 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Primary Drugs and Mechanisms of AcPon 14 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. What approved drugs are in clinical trials? Top 10 approved primary drugs in at 3 of the 5 cancers
Cisplatin
TS-1
Fluorouracil
Paclitaxel
Oxaliplatin
Docetaxel
Capecitabine
Gemcitabine
15 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. What pipeline drugs are in clinical trials? Lung
Gastric
Breast
Colorectal
Liver
apatinib
apatinib
apatinib
apatinib
buparlisib
neratinib
buparlisib
neratinib
orantinib
pexastimogene
devacirepvec
dacomitinib
ramucirumab
neratinib
orantinib
ceritinib
dovitinib
orantinib
dalotuzumab
doxorubicin, Celsion
PEG-arginase, BioCancer
onartuzumab
poziotinib
BYL-719
cediranib
peretinoin
nintedanib
paclitaxel, NanoCap
dalotuzumab
binimetinib
tyroserleutide
nivolumab
rilotumumab
olaparib
encorafenib
refametinib
necitumumab
tesetaxel
LEE-011
fruquintinib
golvatinib
palbociclib
Novaferon
LJM-716
ridaforolimus
Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove® and Pharmaprojects®, data accessed April 2014
16 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. What are the mechanisms-­‐of-­‐acPon of these pipeline drugs? Lung
Gastric
Breast
Colorectal
Liver
RET/VEGFR-2 tyrosine
RET/VEGFR-2 tyrosine
kinase inhibitor
kinase inhibitor
Pan-EGFR/ErbB tyrosine
PI3 kinase inhibitor
kinase inhibitor
PI3 kinase inhibitor
Pan-EGFR (ErbB)
Pan-EGFR (ErbB)
tyrosine kinase inhibitor VEGFR-2 antagonist
tyrosine kinase inhibitor
ALK tyrosine kinase
FGFR1/3 tyrosine
VEGFR2/PDGFR/FGFR
inhibitor
kinase inhibitor
tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Pan-EGFR (ErbB)
MET (HGFR) antagonist tyrosine kinase inhibitor PI3 kinase inhibitor
Multi tyrosine kinase
inhibitor
Taxane
IGF1R antagonist
RET/VEGFR-2 tyrosine
kinase inhibitor
Pan-EGFR/ErbB tyrosine
kinase inhibitor
VEGFR2/PDGFR/FGFR
tyrosine kinase inhibitor
VEGFR2/PDGFR/FGFR
tyrosine kinase inhibitor
IGF1R antagonist
Pan-VEGFR tyrosine
kinase inhibitor
Arginase stimulant
MEK inhibitor
ICAM-1 inhibitor
PD-1 antagonist
MET/HGFR antagonist
PARP inhibitor
MEK inhibitor
EGFR antagonist
Taxane
MET/VEGFR-2 tyrosine
kinase inhibitor
HER3 (ErbB3)
antagonist
CDK4/6 inhibitor
B-RAF kinase inhibitor
Pan-VEGFR tyrosine
kinase inhibitor
CDK4/6 inhibitor
Immunostimulant
RET/VEGFR-2 tyrosine
kinase inhibitor
mTOR kinase inhibitor
Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove® and Pharmaprojects®, data accessed April 2014
17 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. GM-CSF oncolytic virus
DNA topoisomerase II
inhibitor
Retinoid
What is their stage of clinical development in Asia? poziotinib
chidamide
tivantinib
tivantinib
bavituximab
dovitinib
luminespib ombrabulin
pembrolizumab nivolumab
orantinib
dovitinib
apatinib
tesataxel dacomitinib
lenvatinib
dacomitinib
apatinib
paclitaxel,
buparlisib ramucirumab
rilotumumab
NanoCap
alectinib motesanib
onartuzumab
onartuzumab
dovitinib
olaparib
dovitinib
necitumumab
paclitaxel,
peretinoin
orantinib
NanoCap
Competitive
ramucirumab
buparlisib
Landscape
orantinib
palbociclib
refametinib
tyroserleutide
apatinib
ramucirumab
tivantinib
dalotuzumab
neratinib
lenvatinib
LEE-011 BYL-719
doxorubicin,
ramucirumab
pexastimogene Celsion
bavituximab
cediranib
motesanib
tivantinib
fruquintinib
Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove® and
Pharmaprojects®, data accessed April 2014
18 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. orantinib
dalotuzumab
apatinib
Novaferon
Primary Endpoints and Trial Outcomes 19 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. What are the primary endpoints? Lung and Gastric: PFS and OS > DFS and TTP Breast and Colorectal: PFS and DFS > OS and TTP Liver: OS > PFS, DFS and TTP By Disease
1200 Progression Free Survival Disease Free Survival 1000 Time to Progression Overall Survival 800 Response/Efficacy 400 Progression Free Survival Disease Free Survival 350 Time to Progression 300 Overall Survival Treatment Comple[on Feasibility 250 Safety/Toxicity 600 200 Treatment Comple[on Feasibility 400 Other 150 Other 100 200 50 0 0 Lung Gastric Breast Colorectal Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
20 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Liver Lung Gastric Breast Colorectal Liver What are the primary endpoints? Joint sponsorship is most likely to occur in trials with DFS and OS as primary endpoints. By Sponsor Type
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Progression Free Survival 50 Industry 45 Joint 40 Non-­‐Industry 35 Disease Free Survival 30 Time to Progression 25 Overall Survival 20 Response/Efficacy 15 10 Safety/Toxicity 5 Treatment Comple[on Industry Joint Non-­‐Industry Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
21 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
Other Feasibility Treatment Comple[on Safety/Toxicity Other Response/
Efficacy Feasibility Overall Survival Progression Free Survival Disease Free Survival Time to Progression 0 What are the trial outcomes? Industry conducts the most trials with either clear posiPve or clear By Sponsor Type
negaPve outcomes. By Disease
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Completed, Nega[ve outcome Lung Completed, Outcome indeterminate Completed, Outcome unknown Gastric Completed, Posi[ve outcome Breast Terminated, Business decision Colorectal Terminated, Early posi[ve outcome Terminated, Lack of efficacy Liver Terminated, Lack of funding Completed, Nega[ve outcome Completed, Outcome indeterminate Completed, Outcome unknown Completed, Posi[ve outcome Terminated, Business decision Terminated, Early posi[ve outcome Terminated, Lack of efficacy Terminated, Lack of funding Terminated, Other Terminated, Planned but never ini[ated Terminated, Poor enrollment Terminated, Safety/adverse effects Terminated, Unknown Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
22 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Terminated, Other Terminated, Planned but never ini[ated Terminated, Poor enrollment Terminated, Safety/adverse effects Terminated, Unknown Industry Joint Non-­‐Industry Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
What are the trial outcomes? By Primary Endpoint
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Progression Free Survival Disease Free Survival Time to Progression Overall Survival Response/Efficacy Safety/Toxicity Treatment Comple[on Feasibility Other Completed, Nega[ve outcome Completed, Outcome indeterminate Completed, Outcome unknown Completed, Posi[ve outcome Terminated, Business decision Terminated, Early posi[ve outcome Terminated, Lack of efficacy Terminated, Lack of funding Terminated, Other Terminated, Planned but never ini[ated Terminated, Poor enrollment Terminated, Safety/adverse effects Terminated, Unknown Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
23 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Biomarkers 24 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. How are bio-­‐ and pharmacogenomic markers Lung and Breast trials being incorporated? are most likely to By Disease and Patient Segment
0 200 400 600 800 incorporate Bio/PGX markers. Liver trials are least likely. 1000 1200 1400 Lung Gastric Biomarker/Efficacy Breast Biomarker/Toxicity Colorectal Liver PGX -­‐ Biomarker Iden[fica[on/Evalua[on PGX -­‐ Pa[ent Preselec[on/
Stra[fica[on First Line Second Line Neoadjuvant Adjuvant Maintenance Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
25 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. First and Second Line trials are most likely to incorporate Bio/PGX markers. How are bio-­‐ and pharmacogenomic markers being incorporated? By Primary Endpoint
0 Progression Free Survival Disease Free Survival Time to Progression Overall Survival Response/Efficacy 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 2X trials with PFS vs. DFS and OS as primary endpoints incorporated Bio/PGX markers and 3-­‐4X of these trials preselected and straPfied paPents based on PGX markers. Safety/Toxicity Biomarker/Efficacy Treatment Comple[on Feasibility Other Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
26 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Biomarker/Toxicity PGX -­‐ Biomarker Iden[fica[on/
Evalua[on PGX -­‐ Pa[ent Preselec[on/
Stra[fica[on How are bio and pharmacogenomic markers being incorporated? By Trial Outcome
Terminated, Unknown Biomarker/Efficacy Terminated, Safety/adverse effects Biomarker/Toxicity Over 2X m
ore completed PGX -­‐ Biomarker Iden[fica[on/trials Evalua[on with posiPve outcomes PGX -­‐ Pa[ent Preselec[on/
Stra[fica[on incorporated Bio/PGX markers than completed trials with negaPve outcomes. Terminated, Poor enrollment Terminated, Planned but never ini[ated Terminated, Other Terminated, Lack of funding Terminated, Lack of efficacy Terminated, Early posi[ve outcome Terminated, Business decision Completed, Posi[ve outcome Completed, Outcome unknown Completed, Outcome indeterminate Completed, Nega[ve outcome 0 Source: Citeline’s Trialtrove®, data accessed April 2014
27 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. 50 100 150 200 250 CorrelaPons to PosiPve Outcomes •  Use of pharmacogenomic biomarkers for identification or
correlation of efficacy
•  Use of pharmacogenomic biomarkers to select or stratify
patients
•  PFS > OS > DFS > TTP
•  Investigator-initiated trials (data not shown)
28 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Trends Historically, clinical trials in lung, breast, gastric, colorectal and liver cancers have been conducted almost exclusively in just 10 Asian countries (China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand). 29 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved. Since the late 1990s, non-­‐industry sponsors have drama[cally increased their sponsorship of clinical trials, while industry sponsorship has increased at a much slower rate. Since ~2007, industry and joint sponsorship has been rela[vely flat. Trials started in colorectal, gastric and liver cancers since 2010 have been limited to just a few of the top 10 industry sponsors in contrast to breast and lung cancers, while non-­‐industry sponsors are conduc[ng trials across all of the top 5 cancers. OpportuniPes •  Clinical development in gastric, colorectal and liver cancers
•  Oncology clinical trials conducted in less historically popular
Asian countries (Indonesia, Kazakhstan and Vietnam)
•  Increase overall industry sponsorship
•  Increase joint sponsorship between industry and nonindustry for global trials
•  Drugs that are not tyrosine kinase inhibitors (especially
VEGFR and ErbB/HER)
•  Increase the rate of positive outcomes with PFS and OS as
primary endpoints for later stage trials
•  Increase the rate of positive outcomes with targeted patient
populations and the incorporation of pharmacogenomic
biomarkers
30 | Citeline © 2014 All rights reserved.