A Physiographic Surrey - Home - The University of Arizona Campus

A Physiographic Surrey
of
The Ponderosa Pine Type
on
The Salt-Verde River Basin
Technical Bulletin 200
Agricultural Experiment Station
The University of Arizona
Tucson
A Physiographic Survey
Of the Ponderosa Pine Type
On the Salt -Verde River Basin
Peter F. Ffolliott, David L. Fisher, and David B. Thorud*
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Introduction
1
Survey Techniques
2
Presentation of Survey Information
2
Applications of Survey Information
3
Literature Cited
3
Tables 1 through 76
Technical Bulletin 200
21/2M November 1972
*Associate Professor, Graduate Assistant, and
Head, respectively, Department of Watershed
Management, University of Arizona.
4 -60
Agricultural
Experiment Station
t\
J\
\..1N\
N
Flagstaff
1
s
,
VERDE RIVER
BASIN
.4
West
Clear Creek WS
`i
-r`.
.. ....
C
o
yt
}_
i
0
s
i\
r\
rescott
\ (
Beaver Creek WS
/
v%
. iir-/?
,,1
á
White
1
_
River WS
Black
River WS
-
Springerville
\
_
/1
Phoenix
Globe
Pine Zone
Watershed Basin Boundary
Ponderosa
Subwatershed
Boundary
Figure 1. Ponderosa pine type on the Salt -Verde River Basin in north -central Arizona.
INTRODUCTION
The physiographic characteristics of
and surface determine, in part,
potential productivities of associated
natural resource products and uses.
Knowledge of these characteristics,
a
therefore, may be of
assistance
in
planning land management systems
designed to efficiently utilize natural
resources.
An important geographic area which
supplies many natural resource products and uses to Arizona is the ponderosa pine type on the Salt -Verde River
physiographic characteristics of
the ponderosa pine type on the Salt Verde River Basin.' Specific physio-
Basin (Figure 1). This basin furnishes
a diversity of primary wood products,
contributes forage for livestock and
eral
wildlife, yields water for municipal,
graphic information presented includes
slope and aspect relationships, elevation characteristics, rock types (e.g.,
agricultural, and
industrial develop-
ments, and provides many forms of
aesthetic and recreational uses.
The objective of this report' is to
provide basic survey information to
land management planners on the gen-
'This study was supported in part by funds
provided by the U.S. Department of Interior as
authorized under the Water Resources Act of
1964, Public Law 88 -379, and by the Salt River
Project,
Phoenix.
Page 1
igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic), and geologic formations. Additionally, information summarizing
ownership patterns within the basin
is given.
'Similar reports will be developed to provide
basic survey information on the (1) climatic and
vegetative characteristics
River Basin.
(2)
of the Srlt -Verde
SURVEY TECHNIQUES
The measurement techniques emin the survey involved the
assessment of characteristics and patterns as identified on base maps, i.e.,
topographic, geologic, and ownership
maps. Initially, it was necessary to
ownership patterns were assessed on
systematically located sample points
within the area delineated for evaluation. On the portion of the basin
subdivided by the U.S. Public Survey,
delineate the
pine type
section corners comprised the basic
within the Salt -Verde River Basin on
sample design. This design provided
ployed
ponderosa
all maps providing input to the survey. A composite map outlining all
of the survey information was not
available.'
In Arizona, ponderosa pine normally
Physiographic
characteristics
and
sample points on a grid of approximately 1 -mile by 1 -mile. A comparable
grid was simulated on areas not subdivided by the U.S. Public Survey.
Geological Survey topographic quadrangles provided the mapping basis.
Elevation of each sample point was
read directly from U.S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangles, and was
recorded to the nearest 100 -foot class.
Rock type and geologic formation
were determined at each sample point
by classifying the point in terms of
descriptions from geologic maps of
counties within the Salt -Verde River
Basin prepared by the Arizona Bureau
Slope and aspect were described at
each sample point by utilizing a topographic sampler (Lee, 1963), developed for ascertaining slope steepness
and orientation of mountainous landscapes from topographic maps. The
original "sampler" was modified to
facilitate estimation of slope to the
of Mines. An initial classification by
rock type indicated a limited extent
of metamorphic rocks on the Basin,
precluding subsequent geologic formation descriptions within this rock
nearest 21/2- percent class. Aspect was
evaluated on the basis of an eight point compass (e.g., N. NE, E., etc.).
Sample points exhibiting a slope of
Service) and State of Arizona maps,
and U.S. Geological Survey quadrangles. Sample points were classified in
terms of Federal (National Forest and
Meadows, bodies of water, and mu-
less than 3 percent were considered as
Other), Indian, State, and Private own-
nicipalities were excluded.
having neither slope nor aspect. U.S.
ership.
elevations between 5,500
and 9,000 feet, depending on the
occurs at
aspect. Here, the ponderosa pine type
was assumed to be that part of the
Salt -Verde River Basin between 5,500
and 8,500 feet with northerly (clockwise northwest to southeast) aspects,
and between 6,000 and 9,000 feet
with southerly (clockwise southeast to
northwest) aspects. This assumption
agrees with accepted guidelines (Kearney and Peebles, 1942; Little, 1950).
type.
Ownership patterns were determined from National Forest (U.S. Forest
Source maps used as input to the survey are
on file, Department of Watershed Management,
University of Arizona.
PRESENTATION OF SURVEY INFORMATION
To facilitate data presentation, the
survey information has been organized
to describe (a) the Salt -Verde River
Basin, (b) the Salt River Basin, and (c)
the Verde River Basin. Additionally,
smaller watersheds representing areas
of particular interest in terms of natural resource products and uses have
been delineated and characterized;
these watersheds are the Black River
and White River in the Salt River Basin,
The sampling intensity of survey
approaches one sample point per sec-
derosa pine type on the Salt -Verde
tion. Sampling errors are not known,
ly 2.6 million acres, which represents
about 30 percent of the entire basin.
and no estimate of measurement error
has been made. The survey information cannot be considered error -free,
however.
A total of 4,038 sample points were
described in terms of physiographic
River Basin extends over approximate-
Basic survey information for each
land unit described in this report (e.g.,
basin or watershed) is presented in
a set of tables which summarize physiographic features (e.g., slope -aspect,
features and ownership patterns. As-
elevation, and rock type or geologic
and Beaver Creek and West Clear
suming the above -mentioned sampling
formation)
Creek on the Verde River Basin.
intensity, it is estimated that the pon-
within the unit.
Page 2
and
ownership
patterns
APPLICATIONS OF SURVEY INFORMATION
The basic survey information provided in this report can be used by
land management planners in many
ways to assist in determining potential productivities of natural resource
products and uses.
Differences in the radiation balance
between areas, important in the hydrologic cycle, photosynthetic processes, and other natural phenomena,
are often considered largely a function
of solar beam irradiation (Frank and
Lee, 1966). The magnitude of this parameter is dependent on the solar
constant, the influence of the atmosphere in depleting direct solar energy,
and the geometry of a site with respect
The intensity of this theoretical param-
transpiration potentials of plant covers,
eter on a surface
extent of water supply impounded as
snow storage, etc.).
proportional to
the angle of incidence, which, in turn,
depends on latitude, time of day and
of year, and slope steepness and oriis
entation.
Characterizations of slope and aspect relations, coupled with knowledge of latitude and arbitrarily specified time of day and of year, can be
used in conjunction with appropriate
tables (Frank and Lee, 1966 to develop estimates of potential solar beam
irradiation. These estimates can be
developed for each land unit described
in this report.
Elevation characteristics associated
a land
unit are important in
to the sun's rays. Ignoring the cyclic
with
and calculable influence of the atmosphere, a theoretical parameter, potential solar beam irradiation, can be developed as a permanent site feature.
relation to defining temperature and
precipitation gradients. These gradients, in turn, have an effect on different natural phenomena (e.g., evapo-
The elevation characteristics provide
basic data necessary to develop hypsometric relationships (Wisler and Brater,
1959), which are useful in evaluating
temperature and precipitation gradients.
The rock type and geologic formation information may yield information
as to the potential for natural resource
products and uses, both present and
future. These data, along with descriptions of pertinent soil properties, can
possibly be used to index biotic and
hydrologic productivity strata for land
management planning purposes.
Finally, knowledge of ownership
patterns within a land unit is often
prerequisite to the development of
policy relative to the implementation
of management systems.
LITERATURE CITED
Frank, Ernest C., and Richard Lee. 1966. Potential solar beam irradiation on slopes. U. S. Forest Serv. Res. Paper RM -18,
116 p.
Kearney, Thomas H., and Robert H. Peebles. 1942. Flowering plants and ferns of Arizona. USDA Misc. Publ. 423,
1069 p.
Lee, Richard. 1963. The "topographic" sampler. J. Forest. 61: 922 -923.
Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1950. Southwestern trees: a guide to the native species of New Mexico and Arizona. USDA Agr.
Handb. 9, 109 p.
Wisler, C. O., and E. F. Brater. 1959. Hydrology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 408 p.
Page 3
Tables 1 through 76
Table 1.-- Slope -Aspect Relationships on Salt -Verde River Basin.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
SE
S
SW
W
NW
All
Percent of Areal/
Percent
0
E
1.2
1.2
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
1.4
1.7
2.0
1.6
1.9
1.7
1.8
1.5
2.2
2.1
2.2
1.4
1.7
2.6
1.7
1.7
1.5
2.5
1.9
1.6
1.7
2.5
2.1
1.7
1.2
2.0
2.1
1.7
1.6
2.0
1.3
1.4
13.2
17.1
15.1
12.6
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
1.1
1.3
1.1
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.4
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.5
0.8
1.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.2
0.6
0.6
1.1
1.2
0.7
0.8
1.3
0.5
0.4
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.7
8.9
8.3
4.6
5.3
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.2
3.0
3.1
1.6
1.4
32.5
35.0+
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.6
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.6
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.4
3.5
12.3
12.6
11.8 11.3
100.0
Total
1/ Basis:
1.2
12.7 12.5
4,038 sample points.
Page 4
12.5 13.1
1.1
Table 2.-- Elevation Characteristics on Salt -Verde River Basin.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
Percent of Areal"
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
1.7
3.5
2.8
4.0
1.7
5.2
8.0
12.0
5900
6000
6100
6200
3.2
6.8
5.5
7.6
15.2
22.0
27.5
35.1
6300
6400
6500
6600
4.2
5.4
4.5
5.7
39.3
44.7
49.2
54.9
6700
6800
6900
7000
3.9
5.3
4.2
4.4
58.8
64.1
68.3
72.7
7100
7200
7300
7400
3.0
3.4
2.4
2.4
75.7
79.1
81.5
83.9
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.4
2.4
1.5
1.8
85.3
87.7
89.2
91.0
7900
8000
8100
8200
1.0
1.4
0.6
1.2
92.0
93.4
94.0
95.2
8300
8400
0.9
0.9
96.1
97.0
8500+
3.0
100.0
1 /Basis:
4,038 sample points.
Page 5
Table 3. --Rock Type Characteristics
on Salt -Verde River Basin.
Rock Type
Area
1/
PercentIgneous
56.8
41.8
1.4
Sedimentary
Metamorphic
1/
Basis:
4,038 sample points.
Table 4.-- Ownership Patterns on Salt -Verde River Basin.
Owner
Area
Percentl1
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1/ Basis:
4,038 sample points.
Page 6
5.0
16.3
8.3
4.1
1.1
11.1
45.9
0.4
43.3
1.1
9.3
Table 5.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships on Salt -Verde River Basin - Igneous.
Slope
Aspect
None
N
NE
SE
S
SW
W
NW
All
Percent of Areal/
Percent
0
E
1.9
1.9
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
1.8
1.9
2.1
1.2
2.0
1.9
1.9
0.9
2.3
2.0
2.1
1.1
2.3
2.5
1.9
1.5
2.0
3.0
2.2
1.5
2.4
3.6
2.6
1.9
1.7
2.6
2.8
1.5
2.0
2.2
1.5
1.2
16.5
19.7
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
1.1
1.0
0.7
0.5
1.1
1.1
0.5
0.3
1.2
0.6
0.4
0.6
1.0
0.9
0.4
0.6
1.4
0.7
0.5
0.2
1.2
0.9
0.7
0.5
1.3
1.0
0.4
0.3
1.2
0.7
0.5
0.5
9.5
6.9
4.1
3.5
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.1
(t)?/
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.2
(t)
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.1
2.9
2.0
1.3
(t)
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.1
32.5
35.0+
(t)
(t)
0.1
0.4
0.6
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
(t)
0.4
0.2
0.5
2.7
11.6
10.8
12.7 10.9
100.0
Total
1.9
12.0 12.4
(t)
12.6 15.1
1/
Basis:
2,286 sample points.
2/
(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 7
17.1
10.8
0.6
Table 6.
Elevation Characteristics
on Salt -Verde River Basin - Igneous.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
Percent of Area/
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
1.1
2.3
2.4
2.6
3.4
5.8
8.4
5900
6000
6100
6200
2.0
5.4
4.8
6.3
10.4
15.8
20.6
26.9
6300
6400
6500
6600
3.5
4.2
3.9
4.2
30.4
34.6
38.5
42.7
6700
6800
6900
7000
3.0
4.6
3.8
5.2
45.7
50.3
54.1
59.3
7100
7200
7300
7400
3.5
4.8
3.1
3.5
62.8
67.6
70.7
74.2
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.5
3.3
2.4
2.9
75.7
79.0
81.4
84.3
7900
8000
8100
8200
1.8
2.4
1.1
2.1
86.1
88.5
89.6
91.7
8300
8400
1.6
1.6
93.3
94.9
8500+
5.1
100.0
1/
Basis:
2,286 sample points.
Page 8
1.1
Table 7. -- Geologic Formation Characteristics
on Salt -Verde River Basin - Igneous.
Area
Geologic Formation
1/
Percent77.0
16.0
2.0
4.0
1.0
Basalt (QTb)
Basalt (Qb)
Diabase
Granite
Basaltic lava flows, etc.
1 /Basis:
2,286 sample points.
Table 8. -- Ownership Patterns on Salt -Verde River Basin - Igneous.
Area
Owner
1/
PercentFederal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1 /Basis:
2,286 sample points.
Page 9
8.9
20.7
13.0
4.2
0.0
3.6
50.4
0.6
37.9
1.8
9.3
Table 9. -- Slope- Aspect Relationships
on Salt -Verde River Basin - Sedimentary.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
SE
S
SW
All
0.4
0.7
1.4
1.0
1.8
0.6
1.7
1.1
1.6
8.6
13.2
11.6
14.8
0.9
1.6
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.8
1.1
0.5
1.0
1.0
8.9
10.3
5.6
7.8
0.6
0.7
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.3
0.3
3.3
4.9
1.3
2.0
0.1
1.0
0.2
0.9
0.1
0.8
0.1
0.6
1.2
6.1
10.6 10.9
100.0
1.0
1.4
1.7
2.1
1.6
1.7
1.7
2.2
1.8
2.0
2.0
1.8
1.1
2.4
1.5
1.9
1.0
1.7
1.4
1.9
0.8
0.9
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
1.0
1.4
0.8
1.1
1.6
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.1
0.5
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.6
1.2
1.6
1.2
0.6
0.8
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.3
0.7
0.9
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.3
32.5
35.0+
0.3
0.3
0.2
1.0
0.1
0.9
0.1
0.6
12.5
15.1
0.4
14.2 12.9
1/
-
Basis:
NW
0.4
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
Total
W
Percent of Areal
Percent
0
E
1,684 sample points.
Page 10
1.2
1.5
12.9 10.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.1
Table 10.-- Elevation Characteristics
on Salt -Verde River Basin - Sedimentary.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
Percent of Areal/
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
2.3
4.9
3.4
5.6
2.3
7.2
10.6
16.2
5900
6000
6100
6200
4.7
8.7
6.5
9.4
20.9
29.6
36.1
45.5
6300
6400
6500
6600
4.9
7.1
5.5
7.8
50.4
57.5
63.0
70.8
6700
6800
6900
7000
5.2
6.4
4.9
3.4
76.0
82.4
87.3
90.7
7100
7200
7300
7400
2.3
1.7
1.2
0.9
93.0
94.7
95.9
96.8
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.3
1.0
0.2
0.4
98.1
99.1
99.3
99.7
7900
8000
8100
8200
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
99.7
99.8
99.9
99.9
8300
8400
0.1
0.0
100.0
100.0
8500+
0.0
100.0
1/
Basis:
1,684 sample points.
Page 11
Table 11. -- Geologic Formation Characteristics
on Salt -Verde River Basin - Sedimentary.
Area
Geologic Formation
Percent1/
Sandstone, shale, conglomerate
Limestone, shale, sandstone (Ks)
Coconino sandstone
Kaibab limestone
Supai formation (siltstone, mudstone, sandstone)
Limestone, shale, sandstone (CDI)
Sandstone and quartzite
Apache group (limestone, quartzite, conglomerate, shale)
Gravel, sand, silt (QTs)
1/ Basis:
15.0
9.0
14.0
16.0
23.0
12.0
5.0
5.0
1.0
1,684 sample points.
Table 12. -- Ownership Patterns on
Salt -Verde River Basin - Sedimentary.
Area
Owner
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1/Basis:
1,684 sample points.
Page 12
Percentl/
0.0
10.2
2.4
3.2
2.6
19.7
38.1
0.1
52.0
0.2
9.3
Table 13.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships on Salt River Basin.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
E
SE
SW
S
W
NW
All
1
Percent of Area
Percent
0
0.8
0.8
1.0
1.4
1.7
1.7
1.2
1.8
2.2
1.5
1.3
2.4
1.7
2.0
1.2
2.3
1.7
1.9
1.1
1.8
1.8
1.7
0.8
0.8
1.9
1.9
2.2
1.5
1.0
1.6
8.2
14.2
13.4
14.4
1.4
1.5
0.7
1.0
1.3
1.2
0.5
1.2
1.0
1.1
0.7
1.2
1.4
1.2
0.6
0.6
1.0
1.1
0.8
0.7
1.1
1.7
0.6
0.5
1.2
1.0
1.1
0.8
9.7
10.2
5.9
7.1
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.1
0.2
3.8
4.1
1.7
1.7
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.7
0.1
0.3
(t)2/0.1
0.6 0.6
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.5
1.0
3.8
11.9
12.6
13.4 13.3
12.7 11.8
12.5 11.0
100.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.8
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
1.3
1.4
0.9
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
32.5
35.0+
Total
1.1
1.4
1.8
1.1
0.8
1/
Basis:
2,350 sample points.
2/
(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 13
Table 14. -- Elevation Characteristics on Salt River Basin.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
Percent of Areal
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
1.5
3.3
3.0
3.9
1.5
4.8
7.8
11.7
5900
6000
6100
6200
3.4
6.5
6.2
7.9
15.1
21.6
27.8
35.7
6300
6400
6500
6600
4.7
5.4
4.3
6.0
40.4
45.8
6700
6800
6900
7000
3.2
4.0
2.8
2.6
59.3
63.3
66.1
68.7
7100
7200
7300
7400
2.1
1.9
1.6
2.2
70.8
72.7
74.3
76.5
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.5
2.8
2.8
78.0
80.8
82.9
85.7
7900
8000
8100
8200
1.5
2.0
1.0
1.9
87.2
89.2
90.2
92.1
8300
8400
1.5
1.5
93.6
95.1
8500+
4.9
100.0
2.1
1/
Basis:
2,350 sample points.
Page 14
50.1
56.1
Table 15. --Rock Type Characteristics on Salt River Basin.
Area
Parent Material
Percentl/
Igneous
Sedimentary
Metamorphic
1/Basis:
49.0
50.0
1.0
2,350 sample points.
Table 16. -- Ownership Patterns on Salt River Basin.
Area
Owner
1/
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1/
Basis:
2,350 sample points.
Page 15
Percent8.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.8
14.9
25.4
0.0
74.3
0.0
0.3
Table 17.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships on Salt River Basin - Igneous.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
SE
S
SW
W
NW
All
Percent of Area-
Percent
0
E
1.5
1.5
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
1.1
1.6
1.7
1.4
1.5
1.5
2.1
1.0
1.5
1.8
2.1
0.9
1.9
2.2
1.6
1.8
1.5
2.6
1.9
1.3
1.7
2.6
2.6
1.9
1.1
2.3
2.7
1.9
1.3
1.7
1.2
1.6
11.6
16.3
15.9
11.8
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
1.3
1.3
0.9
0.8
1.1
1.6
1.0
0.9
0.5
0.9
1.1
0.8
1.1
0.5
0.3
1.6
0.8
0.3
1.0
0.7
1.0
0.6
1.5
1.3
0.6
0.5
1.5
0.6
0.8
0.5
10.2
8.0
5.3
4.8
12.5
25.0
22.5
30.0
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.6 0.4
0.2 0.3
0.32/0.9
(t)- 0.1
0.6
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.1
0.1
4.3
32.5
35.0+
0.1
(t)
(t)
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.1
0.7
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.8
3.6
11.8
11.4
13.4 10.8
100.0
Total
1.5
12.3 12.9
0.7
0.2
(t)
11.6 14.3
1/
Basis:
1,152 sample points.
2/
(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 16
2.2
2.6
1.1
Table 18.-- Elevation Characteristics
on Salt River Basin - Igneous.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
1/
Percent of Area.-
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
1.0
2.5
3.0
2.7
1.0
3.5
6.5
9.2
5900
6000
6100
6200
2.4
5.0
5.9
6.6
11.6
16.6
22.6
29.1
6300
6400
6500
6600
3.2
3.1
2.5
2.4
32.3
35.4
37.9
40.3
6700
6800
6900
7000
1.2
2.5
1.2
2.4
41.5
44.0
45.2
47.6
7100
7200
7300
7400
1.7
2.0
1.9
3.2
49.3
51.3
53.2
56.4
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.4
4.2
3.9
5.2
57.8
62.0
65.9
71.1
7900
8000
8100
8200
3.0
3.9
1.9
3.9
74.1
78.0
79.9
83.8
8300
8400
3.0
3.1
86.8
89.9
10.1
100.0
8500+
1/
Basis:
1,152 sample points.
Page 17
Table 19.-- Geologic Formation Characteristics
on Salt River Basin - Igneous.
Area
Geologic Formation
Percentl/
Basalt (QTb)
Basalt (Qb)
Diabase
Granite
Rhyolite
Pyroxenite
Basaltic lava flows, etc.
Andesite
82.0
11.0
3.0
3.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1/
- Basis:
1,152 sample points.
Table 20.-- Ownership Patterns on Salt River Basin - Igneous.
Area
Owner
1/
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1 /Basis:
1,152 sample points.
Page 18
Percent17.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.5
24.2
0.0
75.3
0.0
0.5
Table 21.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships
on Salt River Basin - Sedimentary.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
SE
S
SW
All
0.3
1.1
1.6
0.5
1.5
0.9
2.4
0.4
1.4
0.8
1.7
5.3
12.0
10.4
17.4
1.8
1.5
0.4
0.9
1.0
1.5
0.7
0.9
0.6
2.1
0.6
0.4
1.0
1.3
1.4
1.0
9.2
12.1
6.7
9.4
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.3
0.6
0.5
3.6
5.7
0.1
0.3
1.1
2.1
0.1
0.0
(t)?/ 0.8
0.1
0.9
0.1
0.1
0.4
1.0
3.7
11.2 11.0
100.0
1.0
1.8
2.0
2.1
0.8
2.4
1.8
2.3
0.9
2.0
1.2
2.6
0.5
1.0
1.2
2.3
0.6
1.3
1.4
2.4
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
1.2
1.5
1.0
1.4
1.6
1.4
1.0
1.7
1.1
1.6
0.7
1.5
0.9
1.2
0.9
1.6
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.6
0.7
0.1
0.4
0.7
1.0
0.1
0.1
0.4
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.0
0.3
32.5
35.0+
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.6
12.0
13.8
0.6
0.6
0.3
14.7 13.4
13.0 10.6
1/
Basis:
NW
0.3
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
Total
W
Percent of Areal/
Percent
0
E
1,174 sample points.
2/
(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 19
0.6
Table 22.-- Elevation Characteristics
on Salt River Basin - Sedimentary.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
Percent of AreaI/
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
1.9
3.9
3.1
5.0
1.9
5.8
8.9
13.9
5900
6000
6100
6200
4.1
8.2
6.9
9.5
18.0
26.2
33.1
42.6
6300
6400
6500
6600
5.8
7.7
6.1
9.4
48.4
56.1
62.2
71.6
6700
6800
6900
7000
5.2
5.4
4.2
2.8
76.8
82.2
86.4
89.2
7100
7200
7300
7400
2.4
1.8
1.3
1.2
91.6
93.4
94.7
95.9
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.6
1.4
0.3
97.5
98.9
99.2
99.6
7900
8000
8100
8200
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.0
99.6
99.8
99.9
99.9
8300
8400
0.0
100.0
100.0
8500+
0.0
100.0
0.1
1/
- Basis:
1,174 sample points.
Page 20
Table 23.-- Geologic Formation Characteristics on
Salt River Basin - Sedimentary.
Geologic Formation
Area
Percentl/
Sandstone, shale, conglomerate
Limestone, shale, sandstone (Ks)
Coconino sandstone
Kaibab limestone
Supai formation
Limestone, shale, sandstone (CDI)
Sandstone, quartzite
Apache group
Gravel, sand, silt (QTs)
20.0
13.0
13.0
5.0
26.0
8.0
7.0
7.0
1.0
1/
Basis:
1,174 sample points.
Table 24.-- Ownership Patterns on Salt River Basin - Sedimentary.
Owner
Area
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1/
- Basis:
1,174 sample points.
Page 21
Percent?/
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.6
21.6
25.2
0.0
74.8
0.0
0.0
Table 25.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships on Black River Watershed.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
SE
E
SW
S
W
NW
All
1
Percent of Area/
Percent
0
1.4
1.4
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.8
1.9
1.7
1.3
1.8
1.8
2.3
0.9
1.7
2.0
2.3
1.0
2.4
2.5
1.8
1.8
1.8
2.6
2.1
1.4
1.8
2.7
2.7
2.0
1.2
1.8
2.8
2.1
1.1
1.9
1.1
1.8
12.6
17.2
16.8
12.3
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
1.2
1.5
0.4
0.3
1.4
1.0
0.2
0.5
1.1
1.0
0.5
0.9
1.3
0.7
0.8
0.1
1.2
0.7
0.8
0.5
1.4
1.4
0.8
0.5
1.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
10.6
8.2
5.0
3.9
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.1
3.9
1.6
1.6
1.2
32.5
35.0+
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.6
0.1
0.5
0.0
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.0
0.4
0.8
2.9
11.1
11.8
13.6 11.1
100.0
Total
1.4
11.4 13.9
1/
Basis:
840 sample points.
Page 22
12.0 13.7
Table 26. -- Elevation Characteristics
on Black River Watershed.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
1/
Percent of Area
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
0.4
1.7
2.1
1.9
0.4
2.1
4.2
6.1
5900
6000
6100
6200
2.0
4.0
6.9
7.5
12.1
19.0
26.5
6300
6400
6500
6600
2.5
4.3
2.6
3.2
29.0
33.3
35.9
39.1
6700
6800
6900
7000
1.6
2.7
1.7
2.4
40.7
43.4
45.1
47.5
7100
7200
7300
7400
2.3
1.8
2.0
3.2
49.8
51.6
53.6
56.8
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.6
4.0
4.5
5.7
58.4
62.4
66.9
72.6
7900
8000
8100
8200
3.6
3.2
2.1
3.7
76.2
79.4
81.5
85.2
8300
8400
2.1
2.6
87.3
89.9
8500+
10.1
100.0
1/
Basis:
840 sample points.
Page 23
8.1
Table 27. - -Rock Type Characteristics
on Black River Watershed.
Area
Rock Type
Percent
99.2
0.7
0.1
Igneous
Sedimentary
Metamorphic
1 /Basis:
840 sample points.
Table 28.-- Ownership Patterns on Black River Watershed.
Area
Owner
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1/
- Basis:
840 sample points.
Page 24
Percentl/
24.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
24.3
0.0
75.0
0.0
0.7
Table 29.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships
on Black River Watershed - Igneous.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
SE
E
SW
S
W
NW
All
1/
Percent of Area
Percent
0
1.4
1.4
2.4
1.0
2.6
2.6
1.8
1.8
1.8
2.4
2.2
1.4
2.0
2.6
2.7
2.1
1.2
1.9
1.1
2.3
1.1
2.0
1.1
2.0
13.4
17.3
15.4
12.8
0.4
0.3
1.4
1.0
0.2
0.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.9
1.3
0.7
0.8
0.1
1.3
0.7
0.8
0.5
1.4
1.4
0.8
0.5
1.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
10.6
8.2
5.0
3.9
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.1
3.9
1.6
1.6
1.2
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.6
0.1
0.5
0.0
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.0
0.4
0.8
2.9
11.6
11.8
12.2 11.4
100.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
1.2
2.0
1.7
1.3
1.8
1.7
2.4
0.9
1.7
2.1
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
1.2
1.5
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
32.5
35.0+
Total
1.4
11.6 14.1
1/
Basis:
834 sample points.
Page 25
11.9 14.0
Table 30.-- Elevation Characteristics
on Black River Watershed - Igneous.
Elevation
Class
Area
Percent of
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
Area
0.4
0.4
1.7
2.2
1.9
4.3
6.2
2.0
5900
6000
6100
6200
Cumulative
Area
2.1
6.7
7.0
8.2
12.9
19.6
26.6
6300
6400
6500
6600
2.5
4.2
2.6
3.2
29.1
33.3
35.9
39.1
6700
6800
6900
7000
1.6
2.8
1.7
2.4
40.7
43.5
45.2
47.6
7100
7200
7300
7400
2.2
1.8
2.0
3.2
49.8
51.6
53.6
56.8
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.6
4.1
4.4
5.6
58.4
62.5
66.9
72.5
7900
8000
8100
8200
3.6
3.2
2.2
3.7
76.1
79.3
81.5
85.2
8300
8400
2.2
2.6
87.4
90.0
10.0
100.0
4.7
8500+
1/
- Basis:
834 sample points.
Page 26
Table 31. -- Geologic Formation Characteristics
on Black River Watershed - Igneous.
Area
Geologic Formation
1/
Percent99.0
1.0
Basalt (QTb)
Basalt (Qb)
1/
Basis:
834 sample points.
Table 32.-- Ownership Patterns on
Black River Watershed - Igneous.
Area
Owner
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1 /Basis:
834 sample points.
Page 27
Percent24.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
24.5
0.0
74.8
0.0
0.7
Table 33.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships on White River Watershed.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
SE
SW
S
W
NW
All
Percent of Areal/
Percent
0
E
1.1
1.1
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
1.3
0.7
0.8
1.3
0.5
0.8
0.8
1.5
1.1
1.5
1.6
0.9
0.7
2.8
2.5
2.6
0.7
3.2
1.7
1.6
1.1
2.8
3.1
2.1
0.8
3.9
2.9
2.3
1.1
1.5
1.8
1.6
7.3
17.2
15.2
13.9
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
1.2
2.1
0.4
1.1
1.2
1.2
0.8
0.8
0.4
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.5
1.3
1.3
0.9
0.9
2.0
1.5
0.3
0.4
1.1
1.1
1.5
1.2
2.2
2.3
0.5
0.3
9.9
11.0
5.8
6.2
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.8
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.8
0.0
0.4
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.8
0.3
0.0
0.1
4.6
2.8
0.8
0.3
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.9
2.1
14.9 12.1
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
1.2
2/
32.5
35.0+
Total
0.5
0.1
0.7
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
(t)- 0.0
0.4 0.4
11.7
9.4
8.8 13.1
14.6 14.3
0.1
1.1
1/
Basis:
373 sample points.
2/
(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 28
Table 34.-- Elevation Characteristics
on White River Watershed.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
1
Percent of
Feet
Area
5500
5600
5700
5800
0.3
2.7
0.8
2.4
0.3
3.0
3.8
6.2
5900
6000
6100
3.0
3.0
4.6
6.6
9.2
12.2
16.8
23.4
6300
6400
6500
6600
2.1
3.5
3.8
4.8
25.5
29.0
32.8
37.6
6700
6800
6900
7000
4.0
3.5
2.1
2.4
41.6
45.1
47.2
49.6
7100
7200
7300
7400
1.1
3.0
50.7
53.7
55.3
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.3
5.1
2.4
3.5
60.4
65.5
67.9
71.4
7900
8000
8100
8200
1.3
5.4
1.3
3.8
72.7
78.1
79.4
83.2
8300
8400
4.8
3.8
88.0
91.8
8500+
8.2
100.0
6200
1.6
3.8
1/
Basis:
373 sample points.
Page 29
59.1
Table 35. - -Rock Type Characteristics
on White River Watershed.
Area
Percent50.8
49.2
0.0
Igneous
Sedimentary
Metamorphic
lf
Basis:
373 sample points.
Table 36.-- Ownership Patterns on
White River Watershed.
Area
Owner
1/
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaihab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1/ Basis:
373 sample points.
Page 30
Percent0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
Table 37. -- Slope- Aspect Relationships
on White River Watershed - Igneous.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
E
SE
SW
S
W
NW
All
1/
Percent
0
Percent of Area. 2.1
2.1
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
2.2
0.8
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
0.8
11.8
20.2
17.9
11.4
1.1
1.6
0.8
1.9
0.3
0.8
2.1
1.6
2.8
1.3
5.4
1.6
1.6
1.6
4.9
4.3
2.1
1.3
4.0
4.1
1.9
0.4
0.8
0.5
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.5
1.6
1.3
1.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
1.1
0.8
2.4
1.9
0.3
0.8
0.8
1.3
0.3
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.5
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.8
1.1
0.0
0.5
0.3
0.02/
(t)-
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.3
0.0
0.0
4.2
2.7
1.6
32.5
35.0+
0.0
0.8
0.0
1.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
3.2
10.8
6.2
6.5 11.0
17.2 11.2
100.0
Total
1.1
1.1
2.1
0.0
2.1
1.1
0.3
1.6
17.2 17.8
1/
Basis:
188 sample points.
2/
(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 31
1.9
1.9
1.6
1.3
7.4
7.5
4.7
4.8
(t)
Table 38.--Elevation Characteristics
on White River Watershed - Igneous.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
Percent of Areal/
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.5
0.0
1.6
1.6
2.1
5900
6000
6100
6200
1.1
0.5
0.5
3.2
3.7
4.2
6.9
6300
6400
6500
6600
1.1
0.0
1.1
2.7
0.5
8.0
8.0
9.1
9.6
6700
6800
6900
7000
0.5
2.1
0.0
3.2
10.1
12.2
12.2
15.4
7100
7200
7300
7400
0.0
2.1
1.6
5.3
15.4
17.5
19.1
24.4
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.6
8.0
4.3
6.9
26.0
34.0
38.3
45.2
7900
8000
8100
8200
2.7
9.7
2.1
7.4
47.9
57.6
59.7
67.1
8300
8400
9.1
7.4
76.2
83.6
8500+
16.4
100.0
1/
- Basis:
188 sample points.
Page 32
Table 39.-- Geologic Formation Characteristics
on White River Watershed - Igneous.
Geologic Formation
Area
1/
PercentBasalt (QTb)
Basalt (Qb)
43.0
57.0
1/
- Basis:
188 sample points.
Table 40.-- Ownership Patterns on
White River Watershed - Igneous.
Owner
Area
1/
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1 /Basis:
188 sample points.
Page 33
Percent0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
Table 41.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships
on White River Watershed - Sedimentary.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
SE
E
SW
W
NW
All
0.0
0.8
1.9
1.6
0.5
0.8
1.6
2.2
0.3
2.7
1.6
2.7
0.3
0.0
2.6
2.7
3.3
0.5
0.0
2.2
1.6
0.8
1.1
1.6
1.1
0.3
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.02/
(t)-
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.8
0.3
4.9
3.9
0.0
2.8
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.3
0.0
1.2
1.2
11.2 13.7
100.0
S
1/
Percent of Area
Percent
0
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.6
0.0
1.4
0.0
1.9
0.5
2.2
1.4
1.6
0.5
3.6
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
1.6
2.2
0.8
1.4
1.9
2.4
1.1
1.6
0.5
1.6
1.4
1.4
0.5
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
1.1
1.4
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0e8
1.6
0.3
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
32.5
35.0+
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
13.0
13.1
Total
0.0
3.5
2.4
1.1
0.5
0.8
1.1
11.4 15.1
11.4 11.1
1/
Basis:
184 sample points.
2/
-(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 34
1.1
1.9
2.7
1.4
1.6
1.4
1.1
0.0
13.1
12.4
16.7
11.8
14.7
7.0
7.7
Table 42.-- Elevation Characteristics
on White River Watershed - Sedimentary.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
1/
Percent of Area-
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
0.5
3.8
1.6
4.4
0.5
4.3
5.9
10.3
5900
6000
6100
6200
4.9
5.4
8.7
11.0
15.2
20.6
29.3
40.3
6300
6400
6500
6600
3.3
7.1
6.5
9.2
43.6
50.5
57.2
66.4
6700
6800
6900
7000
7.6
4.9
4.4
1.6
74.0
78.9
83.3
84.9
7100
7200
7300
7400
2.2
3.8
1.6
2.2
87.1
90.9
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.1
1.6
95.8
97.4
97.9
97.9
0.5
0.0
92.5
94.7
7900
8000
8100
8200
1.1
0.5
0.0
0.5
99.0
99.5
99.5
100.0
8300
8400
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
8500+
0.0
100.0
1/
Basis:
184 sample points.
Page 35
Table 43.-- Geologic Formation Characteristics
on White River Watershed - Sedimentary.
Geologic Formation
Area
1/
PercentSandstone, shale, conglomerate
Limestone, shale, conglomerate
Supai formation
1 /Basis:
52.9
15.1
32.0
184 sample points.
Table 44.-- Ownership Patterns on
White River Watershed - Sedimentary.
Owner
Area
1/
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
!/Basis:
184 sample points.
Page 36
Percent
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
Table 45.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships on Verde River Basin.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
SE
E
SW
S
W
NW
All
1/
Percent
0
Percent of Area. -
1.8
1.8
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
2.1
2.4
2.4
1.4
2.7
2.3
2.1
1.2
3.2
2.3
2.2
1.2
2.3
2.7
1.8
1.3
2.1
2.4
2.1
1.4
2.4
3.0
2.2
1.7
1.8
2.3
2.1
1.2
2.1
2.5
1.7
1.0
18.7
19.9
16.6
10.4
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
0.9
0.8
0.4
0.3
1.3
0.7
0.6
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.3
1.2
0.7
0.2
0.3
1.6
0.6
0.5
0.4
1.1
1.3
0.4
0.4
1.1
0.7
0.2
0.3
1.0
0.7
0.2
0.7
9.0
5.8
2.9
3.0
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.22/ 0.2
(t)- 0.2
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.9
1.5
1.8
(t)
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.1
32.5
35.0+
0.2
0.6
0.0
0.9
0.1
0.7
0.1
0.7
0.1
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.9
5.0
12.3
12.9
11.0 11.3
100.0
Total
1/
- Basis:
1.8
12.2 11.9
12.5 14.1
1,677 sample points.
2/
`(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 37
0.8
Table 46.-- Elevation Characteristics on Verde River Basin.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
Percent of Areal/
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
2.0
3.7
2.6
4.0
2.0
5.7
8.3
12.3
5900
6000
6100
6200
3.0
7.1
4.3
6.9
15.3
22.4
26.7
33.6
6300
6400
6500
6600
3.5
5.4
4.8
5.4
37.1
42.5
47.3
52.7
6700
6800
6900
7000
5.0
7.1
6.3
6.9
57.7
64.8
71.1
78.0
7100
7200
7300
7400
4.3
5.7
3.5
2.6
82.3
88.0
91.5
94.1
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.4
1.9
0.6
0.4
95.5
97.4
98.0
98.4
7900
8000
8100
8200
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.2
98.8
99.3
99.5
99.7
8300
8400
0.1
0.1
99.8
99.9
8500+
0.1
100.0
1/
Basis:
1,677 sample points.
Page 38
Table 47.- -Rock Type Characteristics on Verde River Basin.
Area
Rock Type
1/
PercentIgneous
Sedimentary
67.7
30.4
1.9
Metamorphic
1 /Basis:
1,677 sample points.
Table 48.-- Ownership Patterns on Verde River Basin.
Area
Owner
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1/
- Basis:
1,677 sample points.
Page 39
Percent
0.0
39.3
20.1
9.4
0.1
5.6
74.3
0.9
0.0
2.7
22.1
Table 49.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships on Verde River Basin - Igneous.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
E
SE
SW
S
W
NW
All
1/
Percent of Area
Percent
0
2.3
2.3
2.1
1.3
2.7
2.9
2.2
1.2
2.5
3.1
2.6
1.7
3.0 2.2
2.8
4.2
2.5
2.7
1.2
1.9
2.6
2.8
1.7
0.9
20.9
22.7
17.9
10.1
0.8
0.4
0.4
0.2
1.0
0.8
0.4
0.3
1.8
0.7
0.3
0.2
1.2
1.1
0.4
0.4
1.2
0.7
0.2
0.1
1.0
0.7
0.1
0.5
9.0
5.7
2.7
2.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.22/ 0.2
(t)! 0.1
0.2
0.2
(t)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.9
1.1
0.7
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.2
(t)
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.2
2.1
11.5
10.3
11.7 11.3
100.0
2.4
2.3
1.7
0.8
3.1
0.9
0.6
0.4
0.3
1.1
0.7
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
32.5
35.0+
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
2.4
2.3
2.4
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
Total
1.1
2.3
0.5
0.4
2.3
11.3 12.1
(t)
(t)
13.7 15.8
1/
Basis:
1,134 sample points.
2/
(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 40
0.3
Table 50.
Elevation Characteristics
on Verde River Basin
Elevation
Class
Igneous.
Area
Cumulative
Area
Percent of Areal/
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
1.3
2.6
1.3
3.4
5.2
7.8
5900
6000
6100
6200
1.6
5.9
'3.7
6.4
9.4
15.3
19.0
25.4
6300
6400
6500
6600
3.8
5.3
5.3
5.9
29.2
34.5
39.8
45.7
6700
6800
6900
7000
4.8
6.7
6.4
7.8
50.5
57.2
63.6
71.4
7100
7200
7300
7400
5.3
7.6
4.2
3.7
76.7
84.3
88.5
92.2
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.6
2.4
0.9
0.5
93.8
96.2
97.1
97.6
7900
8000
8100
8200
0.6
0.8
0.3
0.4
98.2
99.0
99.3
99.7
8300
8400
0.1
0.1
99.8
99.9
8500+
0.1
100.0
2.1
1.8
1/
Basis:
1,134 sample points
Page 41
Table 51.-- Geologic Formation Characteristics
on Verde River Basin - Igneous.
Geologic Formation
Area
1
PercentBasalt (QTb)
Basalt (Qb)
Granite
Basaltic lava flows, etc.
Andesite
?Basis:
70.1
20.3
5.9
2.6
1.1
1,134 sample points.
Table 52.-- Ownership Patterns on
Verde River Basin - Igneous.
Owner
Area
1
1/
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1/
Basis:
1,134 sample points.
Page 42
Percent0.0
41.8
26.1
8.4
0.0
0.6
76.9
1.2
0.0
3.7
18.2
Table 53.--Slope-Aspect Relationships
on Verde River Basin - Sedimentary.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
E
SE
SW
S
W
NW
All
1/
Percent of Area
Percent
0
0.8
0.8
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
1.8
3.0
2.8
1.8
3.7
2.5
2.8
2.1
3.9
2.7
2.4
1.1
1.8
2.6
0.9
1.5
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
0.6
1.1
0.3
0.4
1.6
0.5
0.9
0.1
0.9
0.0
0.2
0.4
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.8
0.6
32.5
35.0+
Total
0.8
0.8
1.6
0.5
1.5
1.2
1.1
1.3
0.9
1.2
1.1
2.3
1.9
1.3
16.1
15.9
14.5
11.0
1.7
0.4
0.0
0.4
1.2
0.5
1.1
0.6
0.6
1.7
0.4
0.6
1.0
0.9
0.3
0.8
1.0
0.7
0.2
1.1
8.6
5.8
3.4
4.4
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.3
2.0
2.0
2.2
1.6
0.4
0.9
0.0
2.0
0.0
1.6
0.2
1.8
0.3
1.2
0.4
0.9
0.1
1.1
0.0
0.8
1.4
10.3
13.7
17.8
9.1 11.2
100.0
14.2 12.6
1/
Basis:
510 sample points.
Page 43
1.1
1.0
1.3
10.1 10.5
Table 54.-- Elevation Characteristics
on Verde River Basin - Sedimentary.
Elevation
Class
Area
Percent of Areal/
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
3.3
7.1
4.3
7.1
3.3
10.4
14.7
21.8
5900
6000
6100
6200
6.1
9.9
5.7
8.8
27.9
37.8
43.5
52.3
6300
6400
6500
6600
2.9
5.9
3.9
4.1
55.2
61.1
65.0
69.1
6700
6800
6900
7000
5.3
8.4
6.5
4.9
74.4
82.8
89.3
94.2
7100
7200
7300
7400
2.2
1.4
1.0
0.2
96.4
97.8
98.8
99.0
7500
7600
7700
7800
0.6
0.2
0.0
0.2
99.6
99.8
99.8
100.0
7900
8000
8100
8200
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
8300
8400
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
8500+
0.0
100.0
1/
Basis:
Cumulative
Area
510 sample points.
Page 44
Table 55. -- Geologic Formation Characteristics on
Verde River Basin - Sedimentary.
Area
Geologic Formation
Percentl/
Sandstone, shale, conglomerate
Coconino sandstone
Kaibab limestone
Supai formation
Limestone, shale, sandstone (CDI)
2.7
16.1
43.0
11.2
22.6
1.0
0.7
1.0
1.4
0.3
Gravel, sand, silt ((Its)
Moenkopi formation
Toroweap formation
Gravel, sand, silt (Qs)
Tonto Group
1 /Basis:
510 sample points.
Table 56.-- Ownership Patterns on
Verde River Basin - Sedimentary.
Area
Owner
1/
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1 /Basis:
510 sample points.
Page 45
Percent0.0
33.7
7.8
10.6
0.2
15.1
67.4
0.2
0.0
0.8
31.6
Table 57.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships on Beaver Creek Watershed.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
SE
S
SW
W
NW
All
Percent of Area
Percent
0
E
0.0
0.0
.3
1.4
1.9
1.1
1.4
1.1
1.4
3.3
1.1
1.6
3.3
3.5
1.6
2.5
2.5
5.1
2.2
1.4
2.2
5.7
2.2
2.5
1.6
3.3
1.1
13.7
18.1
26.6
11.0
1.4
0.3
1.1
0.0
1.6
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.1
2.8
2.2
0.6
0.6
2.8
1.6
0.0
0.3
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.6
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.6
12.7
6.1
2.3
1.8
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.8
0.6
0.3
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
1.2
0.6
0.6
32.5
35.0+
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.9
0.0
1.2
(t)1'0.3
0.3 0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
3.0
10.9
9.3
6.7 10.1
17.7 18.2
15.4 11.7
100.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
1.6
1.9
3.5
1.1
1.6
3.3
1.1
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
Total
0.0
1/
Basis:
181 sample points.
2/
(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 46
Table 58.-- Elevation Characteristics
on Beaver Creek Watershed.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
1/
Percent of Area-
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.6
1.1
1.1
1.7
2.8
5900
6000
6100
6200
0.6
5.0
2.8
5.5
3.4
8.4
11.2
16.7
6300
6400
6500
6600
3.3
7.7
6.6
4.4
20.0
27.7
34.3
38.7
6700
6800
6900
7000
6.1
6.1
5.0
7.7
44.8
50.9
55.9
63.6
7100
7200
7300
7400
6.6
4.4
6.1
10.4
70.2
74.6
80.7
91.1
7500
7600
7700
7800
3.3
3.9
94.4.
1.1
9.4
0.0
99.4
7900
8000
8100
8200
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
99.4
99.4
99.4
100.0
8300
8400
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
8500+
0.0
100.0
1/
Basis:
181 sample points.
Page 47
98.3
Table 59. - -Rock Type Characteristics
on Beaver Creek Watershed.
Area
Rock Type
1/
Percent95.5
Igneous
Sedimentary
Metamorphic
1 /Basis:
1.7
2.8
181 sample points.
Table 60.-- Ownership Patterns
on Beaver Creek Watershed.
Area
Owner
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1/
- Basis:
181 sample points.
Page 48
Percent-/
0.0
93.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
93.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.6
Table 61.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships
on Beaver Creek Watershed - Igneous.
Aspect
Slope
None
N
NE
SE
E
SW
S
W
NW
All
1/
Percent of Area-
Percent
0.0
0.0
1.7
3.4
3.7
1.7
2.5
2.5
4.8
2.3
1.4
2.2
5.4
2.2
2.5
2.3
1.7
0.0
0.3
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.3
2.3
2.3
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
13.6
6.4
1.8
1.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.8
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
2.4
7.2 10.2 16.9 17.0
15.0
12.1
100.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
1.4
2.0
3.7
1.2
1.4
3.4
1.2
0.3
1.4
2.0
1.2
1.4
1.2
3.4
1.4
1.2
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
1.4
0.3
0.6
0.0
3.2
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.6
0.0
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
32.5
35.0+
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
10.6
11.0
Total
0.0
(t)-
1/
Basis:
173 sample points
2/
(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 49
1.7
3.4
1.2
13.5
18.6
26.8
11.5
Table 62. -- Elevation Characteristics
on Beaver Creek Watershed - Igneous.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
1
Percent of Area-/
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.6
0.0
0.0
1.2
1.8
5900
6000
6100
6200
0.6
5.2
2.9
5.2
2.4
7.6
10.5
15.7
6300
6400
6500
6600
3.5
8.1
6.9
4.6
19.2
27.3
34.2
38.8
6700
6800
6900
7000
6.4
6.4
5.2
8.1
45.2
51.6
56.8
64.9
7100
7200
7300
7400
6.9
4.6
4.6
10.3
71.8
76.4
81.0
91.3
7500
7600
7700
7800
2.9
4.0
1.2
0.0
94.2
98.2
99.4
99.4
7900
8000
8100
8200
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
99.4
99.4
99.4
100.0
8300
8400
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
8500+
0.0
100.0
1/
Basis:
173 sample points.
Page 50
Table 63.-- Geologic Formation Characteristics
on Beaver Creek Watershed - Igneous.
Geologic Formation
Area
1/
PercentBasalt (QTb)
Basaltic lava flows, etc.
94.1
5.9
1/
- Basis:
173 sample points.
Table 64.-- Ownership Patterns on
Beaver Creek Watershed - Igneous.
Area
Owner
1/
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1/
Basis:
173 sample points.
Page 51
Percent0.0
93.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
93.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.4
Table 65.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships on West Clear Creek Watershed.
Slope
Aspect
None
N
NE
SE
SW
S
W
NW
All
Percent of Area/
Percent
0
E
2.8
2.8
1.2
3.3
2.6
1.7
0.7
2.0
2.8
2.2
0.7
1.2
2.4
3.8
1.0
1.7
1.7
2.0
1.2
2.4
1.9
2.6
1.2
2.2
2.0
1.7
1.5
17.8
19.2
16.9
10.6
1.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.7
0.0
0.7
0.5
1.0
0.2
0.5
0.2
2.9
1.5
0.0
0.5
0.2
0.7
0.0
0.2
0.7
2.2
0.5
0.5
0.2
2.2
0.0
0.7
1.0
1.7
0.0
1.0
9.2
8.7
1.9
3.8
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
(t)? /0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.5
0.0
1.0
32.5
35.0+
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.5
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.7
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.2
0.0
12.9
12.2
11.6 13.6 11.0 11.7
12.4
11.8
100.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
2.4
2.2
1.9
2.6
3.6
1.0
3.1
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
Total
2.8
1/
Basis:
205 sample points.
2/
(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 52
6.1
Table 66.-- Elevation Characteristics
on West Clear Creek Watershed.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
1/
Percent of Area
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
0.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.5
2.5
4.5
6.5
5900
6000
6100
6200
1.0
4.4
2.9
2.9
7.5
11.9
14.8
17.7
6300
6400
6500
6600
3.4
2.0
1.0
2.4
21.1
23.1
24.1
26.5
6700
6800
6900
7000
7.3
16.2
15.7
13.2
33.8
50.0
65.7
78.9
7100
7200
7300
7400
5.4
4.9
2.9
1.5
84.3
89.2
92.1
93.6
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.0
3.4
0.5
0.5
94.6
98.0
98.5
99.0
7900
8000
8100
8200
0.5
0.5
0.0
0.0
99.5
100.0
100.0
100.0
8300
8400
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
8500+
0.0
100.0
1/
Basis:
205 sample points.
Page 53
Table 67. --Rock Type Characteristics on West Clear Creek.
Area
Rock Type
Percentl/
60.5
39.5
0.0
Igneous
Sedimentary
Metamorphic
1/
Basis:
205 sample points.
Table 68. -- Ownership Patterns on
West Clear Creek Watershed.
Area
Owner
1/
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1/
Basis:
205 sample points.
Page 54
Percent0.0
83.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.9
88.8
0.9
0.0
0.0
11.2
Table 69.-- Slope- Aspect Relationships
on West Clear Creek Watershed - Igneous.
Slope
Aspect
None
N
NE
E
SE
SW
S
W
NW
All
/
Percent
0
Percent of Areal
4.1
4.1
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
1.6
1.6
1.6
2.4
2.0
4.1
0.8
0.8
4.5
3.7
2.0
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
2.4
0.4
0.0
1.2
2.8
3.3
3.3
1.2
1.2
2.0
4.9
1.6
0.0
2.0
2.0
0.8
2.8
2.4
3.7
0.0
2.8
1.2
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
2.8
0.8
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.4
1.2
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
0.0
0.4
0.8
2.4
0.8
0.4
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.8
0.4
2.4
0.02/
(t)-
8.0
9.6
1.6
4.0
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.8
0.0
0.0
32.5
35.0+
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.4
0.0
4.8
12.4
10.5
13.4 15.0 12.9
9.2
12.5
10.0
100.0
Total
4.1
1/
Basis:
124 sample points.
2/
(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 55
17.7
20.3
19.5
8.8
Table 70.-- Elevation Characteristics
on West Clear Creek Watershed - Igneous.
Elevation
Class
Area
Cumulative
Area
Percent of Areal/
Feet
5500
5600
5700
5800
0.0
3.2
0.8
3.2
0.0
3.2
4.0
7.2
5900
6000
6100
6200
0.8
5.7
3.2
4.0
8.0
13.7
16.9
20.9
6300
6400
6500
6600
4.8
1.6
0.8
2.4
25.7
27.3
28.1
30.5
6700
6800
6900
7000
1.6
10.6
14.6
14.6
32.1
42.7
57.3
71.9
7100
7200
7300
7400
4.8
5.7
4.0
2.4
76.7
82.4
86.4
88.8
7500
7600
7700
7800
1.6
5.6
0.8
0.8
90.4
96.0
96.8
97.6
7900
8000
8100
8200
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.0
98.4
99.2
100.0
100.0
8300
8400
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
8500+
0.0
100.0
1/
Basis:
124 sample points.
Page 56
Table 71.-- Geologic Formation Characteristics on
West Clear Creek Watershed - Igneous.
Area
Geologic Formation
1/
PercentBasalt (QTb)
100.0
1/
Basis:
124 sample points.
Table 72. -- Ownership Patterns on
West Clear Creek Watershed - Igneous.
Area
Owner
1/
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1 /Basis:
124 sample points.
Page 57
Percent0.0
91.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
91.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.1
Table 73.--Slope-Aspect Relationships
on West Clear Creek Watershed - Sedimentary.
Aspect
Slope
None
NE
N
NW
All
1.2
1.2
3.2
2.6
4.4
2.6
3.2
1.2
1.8
1.8
1.2
1.2
0.0
0.6
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
2.5
0.0
1.2
0.0
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
32.5
35.0+
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
12.0
14.3
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
1.2
3.2
2.6
0.0
4.4
1.2
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.2
1.2
3.1
1.2
3.2
2.5
2.5
14.8
18.9
13.7
13.6
1.8
0.0
0.6
0.0
3.2
2.5
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
1.8
0.0
0.6
0.6
2.52/
(t) 0.6
1.8
0.6
0.0
2.5
11.1
7.4
2.4
3.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
1.8
0.0
1.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.4
8.8 15.2
12.8
14.3
100.0
1.2
0.0
1.8
2.5
1.2
9.6 11.8
1/
- Basis:
W
1.2
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
Total
SW
S
Percent of Areal/
Percent
0
SE
E
81 sample points.
2/
(t) indicates less than 0.1 percent of area.
Page 58
Table 74. -- Elevation Characteristics
on West Clear Creek Watershed - Sedimentary.
Elevation
Class
Area
Feet
Cumulative
Area
Percent of Areal/
5500
5600
5700
5800
1.2
0.0
3.7
0.0
1.2
1.2
4.9
4.9
5900
6000
6100
6200
1.2
2.5
2.5
1.2
6.1
8.6
11.1
12.3
6300
6400
6500
6600
1.2
2.5
1.2
2.5
13.5
16.0
17.2
19.7
6700
6800
6900
7000
16.0
24.8
17.3
11.1
35.7
60.5
77.8
88.9
7100
7200
7300
7400
6.2
3.7
1.2
0.0
95.1
98.8
100.0
100.0
7500
7600
7700
7800
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
7900
8000
8100
8200
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
8300
8400
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
8500+
0.0
100.0
1/
Basis:
81 sample points.
Page 59
Table 75.-- Geologic Formation Characteristics on
West Clear Creek Watershed - Sedimentary.
Area
Geologic Formation
1/
PercentCoconino sandstone
Kaibab limestone
Supai formation
Limestone, shale, sandstone (CDI)
-/Basis:
13.8
76.2
5.3
4.7
81 sample points.
Table 76. -- Ownership Patterns on
West Clear Creek Watershed - Sedimentary.
Area
Owner
Federal Lands
U.S. Forest Service
Apache NF
Coconino NF
Kaibab NF
Prescott NF
Sitgreaves NF
Tonto NF
Subtotal
Other Federal Lands
Indian Lands
State Lands
Private Lands
1 /Basis:
81 sample points.
Page 60
Percent -/
0.0
71.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.4
84.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.0

Download Report